Search - considered
Results 21 - 30 of 33 for considered
ONSC decision
Gruen Watch Company of Canada Limited, Levy Brothers Co. Limited, Rolex Watch Company of Canada Limited, Canadian Elgin Watch Company Limited, Bulova Watch Company Limited, Goldsmiths, Company of Canada Limited, Cyma Watch Ltd., Lorie Limited, Longines-Wittnauer Co. Of Canada, Hatch and Company Ltd. v. Attorney-General of Canada, [1950] CTC 440, [1949-1950] DTC 784
To this item certain exceptions were made which are irrelevant to be considered in this action. ... The provisions of this statute were considered by my learned brother Hogg in a carefully reasoned judgment in an action against the Attorney-General for Canada, in Greenlees v. ... The result, however, is that where a material fact is alleged in pleading and the pleading of the opposite party is silent in respect thereto the fact must be considered in issue. ...
ONSC decision
In Re Goodman & Carr Et Al., [1968] CTC 484, 68 DTC 5288
I have also read and considered the following cases cited to me dealing with this section of the Income Tax Act, namely: In re Income Tax Act and a Solicitor, [1963] C.T.C. 1. ...
ONSC decision
Jack Miller v. Leroy 8. Harron Et Al., [1956] CTC 102, [1956] DTC 1053
In this connection I have considered the following cases cited: (a) by the solicitor for Her Majesty—Commissioners of Taxation for the State of New South Wales v. ...
ONSC decision
In the Matter of the Trust Deed of Arthur Sturgis Hardy, [1955] CTC 138, [1955] DTC 1062
& Cr. 600 at 617, that it is generally considered more important that the rule of law should be settled than that it should be theoretically correct. ...
ONSC decision
Hommel v. The Treasurer of Ontario, [1953] CTC 89
The very problem that arises here has been considered on almost the same facts, apart from the relationship of husband and wife, under the Finance Act of 1894. ...
ONSC decision
George Hatzinicoloau and George Jenkins v. Minister of National Revenue, Anthony Sebastian Alvernia, R.A. Weavers and J. R. Giles, [1987] 1 CTC 365, 87 DTC 5191
.: (1) A reviewing court, on quashing a search warrant, has power to order return of any goods seized under the warrant. (2) If the Crown shows that the things seized are required to be retained for the purposes of a prosecution, either under a charge already laid or one intended to be laid in respect of a specified chargeable offence, the court may refuse to order the return. (3) No particular formality is required in order for the Crown to show the requisite element of necessity to retain the things. (4) The power to order return of goods is incidental to the power to quash but may also arise under subsection 24(1) of the Charter if the search and seizure was unreasonable as well as illegal. (5) The conduct of the prosecuting authorities in relation to the search and seizure is a factor to be considered in deciding whether to exercise the discretion. (6) Other factors to be considered in exercising the discretion may be the seriousness of the alleged offence, the degree of potential cogency of the things in proving the charge, the nature of the defect in the warrant and the potential prejudice to the owner from being kept out of possession. ... Having reached the conclusion that the subsection is void, in face of section 8 of the Charter, he then considered whether or not the seized materials ought to be returned to the taxpayer. ...
ONSC decision
R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd., 87 DTC 5051, [1988] 1 CTC 421 (Ont HC), aff'd 88 DTC 6314, [1988] 1 CTC 426 (Ont CA), further, aff'd 90 DTC 6243, [1990] 1 SCR 627
But if it is not obeyed no penalty can be imposed without the matter being considered by an impartial judicial arbiter. ...
ONSC decision
Thomas A. Corr and Others v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and Others, [1987] 1 CTC 148, 87 DTC 5047
If the order or search warrant may be reviewed, the weight to be given to the information may be considered at that time. ...
ONSC decision
Herbert Victor Tyrell Estate v. Treasurer of Ontario, [1962] CTC 72
I have had the benefit of a very able argument from both counsel and have considered the provisions of the section and the other relevant provisions of the statute and, in my opinion, the kind of interest in expectancy which is described in subsection (5) is different from the kind of expectancy in subsection (7). ...
ONSC decision
The Queen v. Harvey P. Lamothe, [1958] CTC 201, [1958] DTC 1057
In about the same year the matter was considered in Canada in respect of the Customs Act by the Exchequer Court of Canada. ...