Search - considered

There are four defined income ranges: less than $25,000 between $25,000 and $49,999 between $50,000 and $99,999 $100,000 and above Complexity of T1 return A T1 return is considered complex if at least one of the following conditions applies: there is gross self-employment income (lines 162, 164, 166, 168, or 170 from the T1 return) there is net partnership income: limited or non-active partners only (line 122 from the T1 return) there are taxable amounts of dividends (line 120 from the T1 return) there are employment expenses (line 229 from the T1 return) there are capital gains or losses (Schedule 3) there are taxable amounts of interest income of $1,000 or more (line 121 from the T1 return) there is gross rental income (line 160 from the T1 return) the taxfiler has filed for bankruptcy in the tax year the taxfiler is deceased All other T1 returns are considered simple. ... Note Prior to the methodology changes, a T1 return was considered complex if at least one of the following conditions applied: there was gross self-employment income there was net partnership income there were taxable amounts of dividends there were capital gains the taxfiler had declared bankruptcy the taxfiler was deceased All other T1 returns were considered simple. ...

You are considered to have sold each property (things like supplies, raw material or inventory) that you held and to have collected GST/HST on these sales. ... You are considered to have sold the capital property that you used in your business immediately before you closed your GST/HST account and collected GST/HST on these sales. ... You are considered to have two separate reporting periods once you close your account. ...

With regard to whether the main reason for owning a housing unit is to earn income, a person receiving only incidental rental income from a housing unit is not considered to own the property mainly for the purpose of gaining or producing income. ... The sentences that were removed formerly read as follows: “Or, for example, a seasonal residence can be considered to be ordinarily inhabited in the year by a person who occupies it only during his or her vacation, provided that the main reason for owning the property is not to gain or produce income.” “With regard to the latter stipulation, a person receiving only incidental rental income from a seasonal residence is not considered to own the property mainly for the purpose of gaining or producing income.“ and “As of July 2005, a housing unit owned by a taxpayer that is ordinarily inhabited by the taxpayer or by the taxpayer’s spouse, common-law partner, former spouse, former common-law partner or child could be designated as a principal residence that was ordinarily inhabited in the year.” ...

If the taxpayer has considered, in advance, the functions performed by the related entities and the availability of comparable information, the decision to bundle or not should be easier to justify and documented in writing. ... In order to make reasonable efforts, the onus is on the taxpayer to have accurately described and to have considered, in advance, whether the arm's length principle is being followed for all related party transactions, bundled or not. Bundling is also an issue that should be considered for all payments to non-residents (even if the parties are not related) as it may have reduced or eliminated, otherwise applicable, withholding taxes. ...

For this reason, the monitoring of employee accesses to taxpayer and other similar information by RQ is considered to be out of scope of this PIA. ... While the potential outcomes of these cases will be referred by CRA for investigation purposes, the actual investigations themselves are considered to be out of scope of this PIA. ... H) Potential risk that in the event of a privacy breach, there will be an impact on the individual or employee Details: The sensitivity of information utilized through the Monitoring of Electronic Access to Taxpayer Information Program is considered Protected B. ...

For more information on designated benefits, refer to Qualified beneficiary and designated benefit For the taxable amounts shown in box 16 do not include: the amounts directly transferred on breakdown of a marriage or common-law partnership as reported in box 35 the amounts considered to have been received by the deceased RRIF annuitant just before death the amounts that the deceased RRIF annuitant’s child or grandchild has received or is considered to have received as a designated benefit from a RRIF the income earned on RRIF property after the year that follows the year of the RRIF annuitant’s death For more information about tax situations that can arise when an RRIF annuitant dies, refer to Deceased RRIF annuitant. Box 18 – Amounts deemed received by the annuitant – Deceased The deceased annuitant of a RRIF is considered to have received, just before death, an amount equal to the fair market value (FMV) of the RRIF property at the time of death. ... This includes the following situations: at the time of the payment, the spouses or common-law partners were separated and living apart because of a breakdown of their relationship the contributor spouse or common-law partner died during the year the payer made or is considered to have made the payment at the time of the payment, either the RRIF annuitant or the contributor spouse or common-law partner was a non-resident Box 28 – Income tax deducted Enter the amount of income tax you deducted. ...

Eligibility In order to be considered eligible for funding, organizations must meet all of the following criteria: Must register annually with the CVITP and receive CRA approval to participate in a given year. ... The Revenu Quebec grant is not considered TGA for the purposes of the CVITP grant application, and therefore should not be included as TGA on the application. 5. ... Grant funding received from Revenu Quebec for the purposes of filing Quebec provincial returns would not be considered TGA for the purposes of the CVITP grant application, and therefore should not be included as TGA on the application. 6. ...

This means you are declaring: Only the residential property can be considered as qualifying for the exemption for primary place of residence For only the residential property can your personal occupancy of a dwelling unit (or the personal occupancy of your spouse or common-law partner) be considered as usable for the exemption for qualifying occupancy You must fill out this section to be eligible for one of these 2 exemptions. ...

The employer found that: The average cost for parking across the city is $18 per day on weekdays In the immediate neighbourhood, parking spaces in comparable uncovered lots cost an average of $22 per day There are also covered lots nearby which average $26 per day As the comparable parking spaces to those provided to their employees in the immediate area average $22 per day, $22 would be considered the FMV of the parking space per day, unless there was some other factor in how the parking was provided that either increases or decreases the FMV. ... Travel between work and home is not considered travel for business purposes. ... Although the right to use a parking space is considered a benefit to the employee, the employer is not required to include an amount on their T4. ...

It is considered that this documentation package is consistent with the general principles outlined in Chapter V of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations ("OECD Guidelines"). ... The list of documents below is considered to be exhaustive. That is, it includes all documents that the PATA tax administrations view as necessary in order to provide transfer pricing penalty relief under this package. ... Description of the data and methods considered and the analysis performed to determine the transfer pricing and an explanation of why alternate methods considered were not selected. ...