Search - considered
Results 7871 - 7880 of 7933 for considered
TCC
Sandhu v. M.N.R., 2003 TCC 75
This exercise, as viewed by any reasonable person, would have to be considered redundant at best, was without any reasonable explanation and without evidence from any other person who might have prepared the other records ...
TCC
Merhi v. The Queen, docket 2000-1081-IT-I (Informal Procedure)
The tax advantage which is received from gifts is not normally considered a 'benefit' within this definition, for to do so would render the charitable donations deductions unavailable to many donors. ...
TCC
Sir Wynne Highlands Inc. v. The Queen, docket 97-736-GST-G
This specialized service constitutes a composite whole which for the purposes of this Act was correctly considered by the Minister to be a single supply. ...
TCC
Mayne v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 212
Canada, 2004 FCA 20); Panini v The Queen, 2006 FCA 224 at paragraph 43. [44] In drawing the line between “ ordinary ” negligence or neglect and “ gross ” negligence a number of factors have to be considered: a. ...
TCC
Bauer v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 136
Court considered a motion to strike pleadings involving allegations of ministerial conduct relating to an arbitrary seizure of evidence and section 8 Charter violations and abuses during the investigation, audit and assessment processes. [32] He held that this Court lacks jurisdiction to vacate an assessment based on ministerial conduct in the context of section 8, and subsection 24(1) of the Charter would not provide a remedy. ...
TCC
Lalande v. M.N.R., 2016 TCC 33
Lalande a salary that was considered by the Corporation’s accountant to be a “big salary.” ...
TCC
Gray v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 54
He stated: 43. . . the law will impute knowledge to a taxpayer who, in circumstances that dictate or strongly suggest that an inquiry should be made with respect to his or her tax situation, refuses or fails to commence such an inquiry without proper justification. [34] It has been held that in drawing the line between “ordinary” negligence or neglect and “gross” negligence, a number of factors have to be considered: (a) the magnitude of the omission in relation to the income declared, (b) the opportunity the taxpayer had to detect the error, (c) the taxpayer’s education and apparent intelligence, (d) genuine effort to comply. ...
TCC
Garmeco Canada International Consulting Engineers Ltd. v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 194 (Informal Procedure)
The corporation was considered to be indebted to the Appellant for these payments. ...
TCC
Dryden v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 241
The Minister also varied the reassessments under the ETA to reflect the changes made for income tax purposes. [6] At the beginning of the trial the respondent stated that all withdrawals, transfers from one bank account to another, cheques, drafts and debit memos made by the appellant from his bank accounts were considered personal expenditures. ...
TCC
Baldwin v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 284 (Informal Procedure)
The “connecting factors” [54] In Desnomie v R, [1998] 4 CTC 2207 (TCC), Archambault J. considered the following “connecting factors” to analyze whether employment income was “situated on a reserve”: 1. ...