Search - considered

This informal procedure decision did not elaborate as to what technologies were considered integrated ...

Phillip’s appeal be extended to the date of the hearing, and that the Notice of Appeal be considered timely filed. ...

According to his testimony, there was a three-hour overlap in the case of the waitresses and a two-hour overlap in the case of the cooks. [55]   Furthermore, he submitted that sales were also overestimated because the auditor treated Friday as a weekend day. [56]   On this last point, I agree with the appellant that Friday should not have been considered as a weekend day, since the restaurant was only open for breakfast and lunch. ...

Tacchi was considered an international leader in the building of CNC (computer numerical control) heavy duty lathes. [14]   The three Tacchi lathes were purchased by A&D in or about 2001 and 2002. ...

Peerenboom there were two considered reasons for excluding these items from Mr. ...

He found that in 2002 and 2003 the price range of children’s educational software that were compatible with the latest operating system and featuring well-known children’s characters was approximately $10 to $20 but he considered these products to be superior to the Blue and Purple Collections because they had superior graphics, more activities and longer running times to the activities. ...

[and further] His [i.e. the employee’s] home office cannot be considered an extension of the employer’s office and therefore the travel expenses cannot be said to be incurred in traveling from one place of work to another. ...

There are no similar documents for Objectives 2 and 3. [72]   As a result, I cannot conclude that any of the documents provided by National can be considered contemporaneous documentation that details any of the tests and the results of those tests. [73]   While it is not mandatory that the evidence be documentary, and testimonial evidence may be presented, I did not find that Mr. ...

Each time that Global paid one of the above dividends, the amount that Global was liable to pay under the ITA in or in respect of the particular taxation year or any preceding taxation year exceeded the amount of the dividend. [5]   In its Notice of Appeal, the Trust admitted that: a) during the taxation years in question, the Trust did not deal at arm’s length with Global; b) the Trust received dividends from Global at times when Global was liable to pay one or more amounts under the ITA; and c) each time that Global paid a dividend to the Trust in 2000, 2001 and 2002, the liability of Global to pay one or more amounts under the ITA exceeded the amount of the particular dividend. [3] As the Trust did not give any consideration to Global for the dividends paid in 2000, 2001 and 2002, the only question to be resolved in this Appeal relates to the fair market value of the dividends at the time that they were paid by Global to the Trust. [6]   At the hearing, Kim Moody, the accountant for the Trust, testified that, when preparing the income tax returns of the Trust and Riaz and Zainool Mamdani for 2000, 2001 and 2002, he considered various scenarios in order to determine whether the Trust should include the entire amount of each dividend in its income or whether it would be advisable to allocate some of that dividend to one or more of its beneficiaries. [4] He testified that, if the only income of the Trust in 2000, 2001 and 2002 were the taxable dividends in question and if no portion of those dividends were allocated to beneficiaries, the aggregate amount of federal and provincial income tax that would have been payable by the Trust would have been as set out in three mock income tax returns (as he called them), which were entered into evidence. [5] During the course of Mr. ...

This final account is being rejected, and not being considered in any way in settlement of the building portion of this loss. ...