Search - considered

Results 5441 - 5450 of 7926 for considered
TCC

Brenneur v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 330

Batalha claims that he was not only a subcontractor, but that, in the case of three other clients, he considered himself a business partner of the appellant's, and that their agreement was to share the gross fees received equally. ...
TCC

Van Le v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 292 (Informal Procedure)

The tax advantage which is received from gifts is not normally considered a “benefit” within this definition, for to do so would render the charitable donations deductions unavailable to many donors ...
TCC

Rezayat v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 286 (Informal Procedure)

Miller J. considered whether shares created and distributed under Mexican law were a dividend. ...
TCC

Tampopo Garden Ltd v. M.N.R., 2011 TCC 110

A letter of June 3, 2010 from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to the Appellant, stated:   After conducting a complete and impartial review of all of the information relation to the appeal, it has been determined that Heva Ng received employer controlled tips in the amount of $11,461.00; therefore, these tips are considered insurable employment.   ...
TCC

Caday JR. v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 61

He made instalments of $2,980.84 [7], a figure which ought to be considered by the Minister in reassessing. ...
TCC

Truong v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 72 (Informal Procedure)

  [11]          Each of these items is considered separately below.     [12]          Before doing so, I would first make a general comment about the appellant’s testimony. ...
TCC

Greenwood v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 214 (Informal Procedure)

So there is no basis in our submission for any accrual analysis to be considered.   ...
TCC

Paquette v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 208 (Informal Procedure)

The actions of the father and his son must be considered separately since the penalty is applied to punish the negligent actions of the taxpayer, specifically the failure to declare income for two years. ...
TCC

Moisan v. M.N.R., 2011 TCC 76

How the cheques were cashed   [11]          The relevant assumptions, as reproduced below, are set out in paragraph 6 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal:   [Translation]   (y) the time the appellant waited before cashing his paycheques varied from 23 to 68 days in 2006 and from 3 to 56 days in 2007, but it was impossible to determine the times for 2008 and 2009;   (z) the appellant considered those times to be reasonable, since the payor did not have the money to pay him and his personal line of credit was less costly than the payor’s;   (aa) the payor’s other employees did not wait before cashing their paycheques;   [12]          The appellant admitted that he varied when he cashed his paycheques, as shown. ...
TCC

Guibord v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 53

I have considered the following:   a)      The result of the proceeding:   All appeals were allowed in part. ...

Pages