Search - considered
Results 1401 - 1410 of 7933 for considered
TCC
Fortune v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 20 (Informal Procedure)
He argues, however, that certain other documents, when considered in light of his having actually made the payments claimed, constitute a "written agreement" within the meaning of the Act ... ] [11] This decision was considered by Bowman, A.C.J. (as he then was) in Foley v. ...
TCC
Lopez v. Human Resources, 2007 TCC 127
[30] Further, in 2001 when he started he may very well have been an independent contractor or may have been considered to be an independent contractor by the College, that year is not before the Court ... He was an employee of Algonquin College and Algonquin College considered him to be an employee ...
TCC
Palin v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 255 (Informal Procedure)
Respondent's Position [4] The position of the Respondent is that: (1) the Minister considered the Appellant's request for interest relief under subsection 220(3.1) of the Act; (2) under subsection 165(1.2) of the Act no objection may be made by a taxpayer to an assessment made under subsection 220(3.1). ... No. 713 where subsection 165(1.2) of the Act, was also considered. Justice Mogan stated in paragraph 10 as follows: Having found that the reassessment under appeal was made under subsection 152(4.2), I conclude that subsection 165(1.2) applies and no valid objection could be made by the Appellant to that reassessment. ...
TCC
Dean v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 356 (Informal Procedure)
[24] I have carefully considered the argument of Counsel for the Appellants and Counsel for the Respondent plus the various Court decisions that they referred to. ... [26] I have also considered the arguments raised by counsel for the Appellants with respect to the application of paragraph 12(1)(x) and subsection 13(7.4). ...
TCC
Bouchard v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 369 (Informal Procedure)
., produced an original log which the Respondent considered inadequate and although the absence or inadequacy of a log is not in all cases determinative, it must be considered. ...
TCC
Schwartz v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 432 (Informal Procedure)
She also considered having the land developer build a house on the lot and then selling the property. ... I do not indicate which way it ought to be, but I commend the Commissioners to consider what took place in the nature of organizing the speculation, maturing the property, and disposing of the property, and when they have considered all that, to say whether they think it was an adventure in the nature of trade or not. ...
TCC
Corsi v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 472
[2] At the hearing of the motion, the Crown asked that the motion also be considered as a Rule 58 motion on the basis that a timely objection or extension application is a condition precedent to instituting a valid appeal, which has not been met. ... [7] The Crown acknowledged today that, given this state of affairs, the assessment could not be considered to have been sent to the taxpayer on June 21, 2004 for purposes of subsection 152(2), nor could that be the day of mailing for purposes of beginning the 90-day period within which to file an objection under section 165 ...
TCC
Meszaros v. M.N.R., 2008 TCC 525
As she was not engaged in a contract of service, she would not normally be considered to be “employed” for purposes of determining whether she had insurable employment. ... Meszaros rented a salon three days a week in a shopping mall, and was the sole business being conducted from those premises on those three days, would the mall owner be considered to be the operator of the premises on those three days? ...
TCC
Hochhausen v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 299 (Informal Procedure)
Sutherland’s group of companies, and his knowledge of past tax problems make up part of the comparable circumstances to be considered. ... Hochhausen said he always considered himself an outside director. The Crown maintains that he was an inside director. ...
TCC
Gervais c. La Reine, 2008 TCC 190 (Informal Procedure)
Law [5] At the time in question, the definition of "eligible individual" in section 122.6 of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") read as follows: “eligible individual” in respect of a qualified dependant at any time means a person who at that time (a) resides with the qualified dependant, (b) is the parent of the qualified dependant who primarily fulfils the responsibility for the care and upbringing of the qualified dependant, (c) is resident in Canada or, where the person is the cohabiting spouse or common-law partner of a person who is deemed under subsection 250(1) to be resident in Canada throughout the taxation year that includes that time, was resident in Canada in any preceding taxation year, (d) is not described in paragraph 149(1)(a) or 149(1)(b), and (e) is, or whose cohabiting spouse or common-law partner is, a Canadian citizen or a person who (i) is a permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, (ii) is a temporary resident within the meaning of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, who was resident in Canada throughout the 18 month period preceding that time, or (iii) is a protected person within the meaning of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, (iv) was determined before that time to be a member of a class defined in the Humanitarian Designated Classes Regulations made under the Immigration Act, and for the purposes of this definition, (f) where the qualified dependant resides with the dependant’s female parent, the parent who primarily fulfils the responsibility for the care and upbringing of the qualified dependant is presumed to be the female parent, (g) the presumption referred to in paragraph 122.6 eligible individual (f) does not apply in prescribed circumstances, and (h) prescribed factors shall be considered in determining what constitutes care and upbringing ... For the purposes of paragraph (h) of the definition “eligible individual” in section 122.6 of the Act, the following factors are to be considered in determining what constitutes care and upbringing of a qualified dependant: (a) the supervision of the daily activities and needs of the qualified dependant; (b) the maintenance of a secure environment in which the qualified dependant resides; (c) the arrangement of, and transportation to, medical care at regular intervals and as required for the qualified dependant; (d) the arrangement of, participation in, and transportation to, educational, recreational, athletic or similar activities in respect of the qualified dependant; (e) the attendance to the needs of the qualified dependant when the qualified dependant is ill or otherwise in need of the attendance of another person; (f) the attendance to the hygienic needs of the qualified dependant on a regular basis; (g) the provision, generally, of guidance and companionship to the qualified dependant; and (h) the existence of a court order in respect of the qualified dependant that is valid in the jurisdiction in which the qualified dependant resides ...