Search - considered

Format of the notices of violation [27]            Even though I am dismissing the motion for lack of jurisdiction, I nonetheless considered the applicant’s arguments. ...

Justice Stratas stated in Sawridge Band, inadvertence comes in all shapes and sizes, sometimes forgivable, sometimes not, and it must be considered “in light of the appropriate legal test and all the surrounding factual circumstances” (Sawridge Band, above, at para 13). [40]            Here, as I have already indicated, the computational error of Mr. ...

“Mandy Aylen” Prothonotary FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2161-15 STYLE OF CAUSE: BRADWICK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. v MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369 OF THE FEDERAL COURTS RULES ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 ORDER AND REASONS: AYLEN P. ...

For the reasons given in Nguyen, supra, those arguments cannot be considered and are not relevant to the issue at hand. [68]   The Applicant could only challenge the finding of a contravention by commencing an action pursuant to section 135 of the Act, that is by issuance of a Statement of Claim, leading to a trial; see the decision in Trites v. ...

Had the defendant considered it a genuine issue, she would have raised it then or, at least, far earlier than she did.   ...

Confidentiality [28]   The confidentiality of certain information should be considered in two stages. ...

Her examples included that board member resources, the number of members required to hear a matter, whether it is a panel hearing or a paper decision etc. are all considered. ...

Avril failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut those findings and establish the risk she faced. [28]   The Respondent notes that a PRRA is not a reconsideration of the RPD’s rejection of her refugee protection claim and it is not an opportunity to collaterally attack the finding that her marriage is not genuine. [29]   The Respondent submits that the Officer considered all the evidence and provided detailed reasons for his assessment of the evidence and his overall finding to dismiss the application. ...

Protection against self-incrimination is considered a principle of fundamental justice, which brings it under section 7 if someone’s liberty is in jeopardy (R v S (RJ), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 451). ...

In Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (Hryniak), the Supreme Court of Canada considered the values underlying the summary judgment process. ...