Search - considered

The validity of this second jeopardy collection order is considered in a concurrent decision ...

Stillman, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607 where the Supreme Court of Canada considered conscriptive evidence (that which a person was compelled to produce by a breach of his or her Charter rights) and non-conscriptive evidence (that existed independently of the Charter breach) and how such evidence could be used in criminal proceedings.  ...

.:   While in the sense identified by the majority, subsection 160(1) may be considered a harsh collection remedy, it is also narrowly targeted.  ...

The evidence includes findings of fact and law in judicial decisions that have considered Ms. ...

No. 1113 (QL), in which Associate Chief Justice Jerome wrote at paragraph 21: … In [Satellite Earth], MacKay J. reviewed the factors to be considered by a court on a s.225.2(8) review of a jeopardy collection order. ...

In Satellite Earth, MacKay J. reviewed the factors to be considered by a court on a subsection 225.2(8) review of a jeopardy collection order. ...

Apprehension of Bias [31]            In this case the respondent carefully and thoroughly considered the fairness request for a refund after the three year time limit ...

)   [17]            In imposing sentence for contempt, the factors to be considered include the gravity of the contempt, whether the instance of contempt is the first offence, the presence of any mitigating factors such as good faith or an apology and the need for deterrence (Winnicki v Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2007 FCA 52 at paras 17-18 and Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Marshall, 2006 FC 788   at para 16) ...

The job poster indicated that candidates’ current job-related performance would be considered at both the assessment and placement phases, via reference checks, interviews and/or review of samples of candidates’ work ...

I therefore agree that a message indicating that the applicant’s return had already been received when that was not the case can be seen as misleading. [38]            This also means that the error message and the decision letter, which rejected the electronic version because amended returns could not be filed electronically prior to January 1, 2014, can be considered erroneous. ...