Search - considered

I also considered solicitor-client costs in detail. In the result, while I felt, as I say, that there was clear abuse, I was reluctant to award solicitor-client costs, referring to Schmidt v. ...

Alternatively, of course, the Act could be amended to exempt completely these kinds of grants from income, as recommended by the Federal Task Force on Disability Issues in its report: Equal Citizenship for Canadians with Disabilities (1996). [31]            In conclusion, there is no doubt that the Tribunal carefully considered the evidence before it, weighed the relevant factors, and arrived at a reasonable conclusion. ...

A case is considered a private matter between the parties involved;-                give expression to the principles of procedural fairness (i.e. the right to be heard, etc);-                comply with the laws governing the Agency and its employees;-                determine the relevancy of the information provided by the parties. ...

  [51]      Having considered the circumstances of this case as a whole, the Court finds that the balance of convenience favours the applicant ...

  [19]      In my opinion, this benefit should be considered the “proceeds” from the certificate of deposit. ...

Whether debt payable or to become payable [40]      Several points must be considered before determining the payability of the debt. ...

He also considered the expansive approach to production of documents taken in The Peruvian Guano case (1882) 11 Q.B.D. 55 (C.A.) but then added the caveat that:... every party has a right to properly prepare his case or his defence "but there must always be reasonable limits"... ...

., [1984] 1 S.C.R. 614, continued to be valid for interpreting section 232.2. [26]      Further, the wording of section 232.2(2) is clear and in my view does not permit an interpretation that disregards the literal meaning in favour of an interpretation which is considered more likely to advance the objectives of the Act, which might be possible in the case of less clear legislation. [27]      In Canada v. ...

The proposition is very simple: in an adjudication, documents pertaining to a grievor that are in the possession of the employer, which the employer wishes to use in a disciplinary action against an employee, must be subject to advance production. [17]            Therefore, in circumstances such as those in the present case, the standard of fairness established by article 17.04 requires an employer to give a grievor a fair chance to know the precise contents of the documentary evidence to be presented against him or her at an adjudication, far enough in advance of the hearing to allow the preparation of any response considered necessary. [18]            Thus, when the three documents in question were tendered for admission into evidence, the Adjudicator was required to answer two questions with respect to each before deciding whether to admit or exclude them: were the documents in the possession of the employer; and, did the Applicant know of their actual contents? ...

Justice Lemieux considered the principles applicable to the assessment of a penalty for contempt in Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. ...