Search - considered

Was there a reasonable apprehension of bias that the applicant’s allegations were not considered impartially?             ... The applicant submitted that while the officer considered her submission for part marks, he ignored her submission that for five questions she should have received full marks. ... The applicant submitted that as these documents relate to her allegations and were considered by the officer in making his decision, she should have been given the opportunity to respond to them. ...

However, the decision-makers considered that the Applicants were warned in all of the letters and was advised to pay to avoid the accumulation of interest.   ... The Team Leaders considered the dates for the audit and the objections and determined that the Applicants always received their response before the timelines provided.   ... Cancelling a penalty based on an inability to pay or financial hardship would not generally be considered, unless an extraordinary circumstance prevents compliance. ...

A decision will be unreasonable if the BIOC are not sufficiently considered (Kanthasamy, cited above, at para 39). ... The Officer considered them but said they are “undated and some of the photos appear to have been taken at a hospital with a newborn.” ... The Applicant stated that as “none of these factors were specifically considered by the Officer in the decision. ...

The Officer then included quoted portions of paragraphs of the RPD decision that addressed credibility (RPD decision, paragraphs 4, 21, and 25). [10]   The Officer found that the risk alleged by the Applicant, that he would be at risk of harm in China because he is a Christian who attended an underground Christian house church, was the same risk considered by the RPD. ... The Federal Court of Appeal set out a non-exhaustive list of factors to be considered by a decision-maker when assessing the admissibility of new evidence, including credibility, relevance, newness, and materiality. ... Had the Officer considered the new evidence concerning schizophrenia in the context of the RPD’s credibility findings, the Officer may or may not have found that no change in the RPD’s credibility assessment was warranted. ...

Defendant therefore cannot be considered as having rights of ownership which would imply the right to dispose of or use the information in any legal manner it might choose. ... Royalties, which are akin to rental payments, have invariably been considered as income since they are either based on the degree of use of the right or on the duration of the use, while a lump sum payment for the absolute transfer of a right, without regard to the use to be made of it, is of its nature considered a capital payment, although it may of course be taxable as income in the hands of the recipient if it is part of that taxpayer’s regular business... ... In other words, everything is considered to be covered. This is a fundamental change from the basic scheme and concept of the previous Act which employed general language in its charging provisions. ...

Baron had not demonstrated that he could not work for reasons considered reasonable or related to a COVID‑19 lockdown, and that he had not experienced a 50% reduction in his average weekly income. [18] On August 18, 2022, Mr. ... Nowhere is it mentioned that the second review may involve eligibility criteria other than those considered in the first review. ... On the contrary, the Officer’s notes make only one very general reference to the fact that [translation] “all of the criteria must be considered”, without ever identifying for Mr. ...

In consequence, he was not considered further in the selection process. ... Anderson's substantial experience was not properly considered. No consideration was given to Mr. ... Anderson wanted was a chance to explain his view that he met the definition of recent experience. [77]            I have considered Mr. ...

These criteria are not exclusive of other criteria to be considered, such as the illness and death of Mr. ... Ralla states the factors which she considered in making her decision. ... Ralla should not have considered the applicants" request for waiver of interest until such time as all questions in dispute had been determined. ...

The Minister appropriately considered the grounds for relief raised by Mr. ... Arsenault considered in preparing her report, the particular facts she noted in Mr. ... The Minister considered those grounds and concluded that relief was not warranted. ...

I have reviewed your submissions as well as other information that I considered to be relevant to your request, including the guidelines in IC 92-2. ... These criteria are not exclusive of other criteria to be considered, such as the illness and death of Mr. ... Raila states the factors which she considered in making her decision. ...