Search - considered

The Applicant refers in particular to the explanation provided in the Amended Narrative which she submitted for her de novo hearing. [13]   The Decision demonstrates that that the RPD was aware of the Amended Narrative, as it refers to this document and provides the following analysis: The panel also considered the claimant’s explanation regarding this inconsistency stated in the Amended Narrative, paragraphs 4 to 14, proffered at the hearing De Novo. ...

The Officer considered (1) family ties in Canada and in country of residence; (2) purpose of visit; and (3) the Applicant’s history of having contravened the conditions of admission on a previous stay in Canada. [10]   The Officer’s Global Case Management System notes, dated February 15, 2019, indicate that notwithstanding several positive factors, those factors were outweighed by: (i) Given family ties or economic motives to remain in Canada, the applicant’s incentives to remain in Canada may outweigh his ties to his home country; (ii) the Applicant was previously issued a study permit in 2012 but did not complete his studies. ...

The Applicant argued it displayed a pattern that the RAD should have considered.   ...

A tribunal must be careful when rendering a decision based on a lack of plausibility because refugee claimants come from diverse cultures, and actions which appear implausible when judged from Canadian standards might be plausible when considered from within the claimant's milieu. ...

Barnes" Judge   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: T-455-16 T-456-16   DOCKET: T-455-16   STYLE OF CAUSE: KRISTEN MARIE WHALING (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRISTOPHER JOHN WHALING) v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN DOCKET: T-456-16   STYLE OF CAUSE: WILLIAM WEI LIN LIANG v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369 OF THE FEDERAL COURTS RULES ORDER AND REASONS: BARNES J.   ...

Here the evidence was assessed, but when the concerns about the documentary evidence were considered in the context of the applicant’s overall refugee protection claim, the credibility concerns could not be overcome. ...

Bansal. [13]   The evidence considered by the Discipline Committee included the Affidavit evidence of ICCRC investigator Natalie Wruck sworn on June 4, 2019. ...

In this respect, the RPD considers that the applicant has some maternal family members in the city, which the RPD claims “have not been shown willing to collude with the father to assist him in finding the claimant”. [7]   Onitsha appears to have been the only IFA considered by the RPD. ...

It considered the Applicant’s assessments by professionals both in Colombia and Canada in 2012, and then again in Canada (2018), noting he suffered from depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). ...

It is assumed such documentation as the spouse’s BOC would corroborate the Applicant’s testimony, such that when he does not enter it into the evidence without explanation, the RPD is entitled to conclude that the lack of explanation as to its absence undermines the credibility and probative sufficiency of his case. [11]   Turning to the second issue, the RPD considered the spouse’s BOC and found that its information was inconsistent with, and not helpful to the Applicant’s case. ...