Search - considered

Such an act cannot be considered to be a “voluntary re-availment of protection” and will not deprive a person of refugee status. 121. ... On the other hand, obtaining an entry permit or a national passport for the purposes of returning will, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be considered as terminating refugee status. ... Rather, the RPD considered whether the actions of the Applicant herself met the three-part test of reavailment, which test does not distinguish between state and non-state agents of persecution. ...

Ignorance of the law cannot be considered for a request to cancel the tax on excess RRSP contributions. ... In Connolly v Canada (National Revenue), 2019 FCA 161 [Connolly], the Federal Court of Appeal considered the application of subsection 204.1(4) of the ITA in respect of the first branch of the test, reasonable error. … reasonableness will turn on an objective assessment of all the relevant evidence. ... Given this obligation, it is difficult to see how a taxpayer’s ignorance about the fact that RRSP contributions are subject to a limit could be considered reasonable. ...

They report that the Applicant’s submissions were received and considered. ... The reviewing court must refrain from “reweighing and reassessing the evidence considered by the decision maker”: CHRC, at para. 55; see also Khosa, at para. 64; Dr. ... The Respondent submits these documents should not be considered by the Court. ...

.… [24] In my review of the Order, it is clear that the Associate Judge properly considered the application and correctly applied the applicable legal tests in determining that the application should be struck because it was bereft of any possibility of success. [25] The Applicant has not established that Order contains a palpable and overriding error in finding that the application was not compliant with Rule 301. ... Abuse of process [26] In addition, the Applicant argues that the Order striking the application without leave to amend because it was an abuse of process is an error. [27] The Respondent argues that the Associate Judge carefully considered the application and the Applicant’s written representations. ... “Julie Blackhawk” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2506-24 STYLE OF CAUSE: JEFF EWERT v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA (CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADA) MOTION IN WRITING PURSUANT TO RULE 369 OF THE FEDERAL COURTS RULES, SOR/98-106 CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA, ONTARIO. ...

The “other available information” relevant to the inquiry will depend on the nature of the information being considered for release. ... The RCMP considered that the serial numbers could therefore be used to glean personal information from the CFIS database. ... There is no evidence that the issues considered by Mr. Smith were considered by the access officer. ...

To do so, he considered the applicant’s entire immigration record and the allegations and evidence submitted by the applicant regarding his current medical condition. ... That being said, the substance of those allegations were already considered by the H & C officer and it was previously determined the applicant could access treatment. ... (QL)). [43] The applicant also contends that her third application for H & C contains “new” information which was not previously considered. ...

George, on the basis of it being “self-serving” and on the basis of the credibility findings made before it was considered. ... Nonetheless, the Board failed to indicate, how, if at all, the psychological report was considered when making its credibility finding. The Board was obliged to do more than merely state that it had “considered” the report. ...

The appellant argues that the object and purpose of the Act must be considered. ... The Decision Under Appeal 8 The Tax Court Judge considered the application of subsection 55(1) to the case at bar and found that it did not apply to reduce the losses claimed by Nova. ... </p>] 66 All the circumstances must be looked at to appreciate if the taxpayer “may reasonably be considered to have...” ...

POINTS AT ISSUE [2]                The points at issue are the following: (1)       Should the new evidence the appellant wishes to submit be considered by the Court? ... ANALYSIS Should the new evidence the appellant wishes to submit be considered by the Court? ... Marrazza and the Laurentian Bank, in case No. 500-17-004262-989. [6]                The usual test for determining whether new evidence should be considered was laid down in [1964] S.C.R. 122 "> Dormuth v. ...

DEFENDANT'S ARGUMENTS [15]      The defendant mentioned that the plaintiff's case was considered pursuant to the discretion conferred in s. 152(4.2) of the Act, and that the decision of February 15, 2001, was made in that context. [16]      The defendant asked the plaintiff's employer what its policy was on payment of automobile expenses. [17]      The employer informed the defendant that the plaintiff was unionized and he was paid a standard allowance under the collective agreement between the employer and his union. [18]      The defendant added that it was not up to her to assess all the conditions of the collective agreement, and unless the information received from the employer was completely unreasonable it was not this Court's function to intervene. [19]      Further, during the course of negotiating a collective agreement, it is very probable that the union will emphasize some areas more than others in order to benefit its employees. [20]      As to the decision in Yvon Royer v. ... Moreover, looking carefully at the sections of the collective agreement applicable here, I note that a remedy existed which the plaintiff could have used if he considered that the payment of the standard allowance for his travel was unreasonable. ... An allowance for travel expenses is not considered unreasonable merely because the employee's total expenses for business travel exceed the total travel allowances received in the year. ...