Search - considered

None of the mileage described in the first example is considered incident to the discharge of the duties of employment. 2. ... Similarly, the travel from home to the memorial service and then to the church is considered employment-related but the travel from the church to home is considered personal. 4- 6. None of the mileage described in examples 4, 5, and 6 is considered incident to the discharge of the duties of employment. 7. ...

Generally, the activities of distributing, retailing or maintaining frozen food that was acquired frozen or the thawing of such food by a taxpayer would not be considered to be food processing. However, the Department considers that original blast freezing and maintaining of food at 0F by a taxpayer would be considered as a processing activity. ... Subject to our comments above, it is our view that certain activities in the meat, bakery and produce operations carried on by a corporation could be considered as manufacturing and processing. ...

Furthermore, the U.S. resident shareholder(s) of the S-corporation would not be considered to derive the dividend income received by the S-corporation. ... For U.S. income tax purposes, the shareholders of the S-corporation would not be considered to derive dividend income for U.S. income tax purposes and therefore would not satisfy the requirements of Article IV(6). ... Article IV(7)(b) provides that a dividend shall be considered not to be paid to or derived by a person who is a resident of the United States where the person is considered under Canadian income tax laws to have received the dividend from a Canadian-resident corporation, but by reason of the fiscal transparency of the Canadian-resident corporation under United States income tax laws, the treatment of the dividend under United States income tax laws is not the same as its treatment would be if the Canadian-resident dividend payer were not considered fiscally transparent. ...

You have asked us whether all four of these properties would be considered one property for the purpose of determining whether it is a "former business property" or whether each of the four properties would be considered to be "former business property" or whether a portion of each property would be considered to be a "former business property". ... Another important factor to be considered is the proportion of the amount of space rented in relation to the total area of the building. ... However, even if the operating company was paying rent for the parking space and those factors in IT-491 were considered, it would appear that each property would still be considered to be used principally to produce gross revenue that is rent and therefore be considered to be a "rental property" since paragraph 248(1)(c) of the definition of "former business property" specifically excludes land contiguous to the land that is subjacent to a rental property that is a parking area. ...

Unless specific facts indicate otherwise, the MIC would be considered to be investing its funds in units of a mutual fund trust. The MIC would generally be considered to be holding units in a trust and not the bonds, stocks, real property or other assets that are owned by the trust. 2. Depending on the particular facts, the MIC may be considered to be carrying on the business of the partnership which would be more activity that the mere investing of its funds. ...

In such circumstances the departing spouse would not be considered to have severed his residential ties with Canada. ... " Paragraph 6 "If a married individual leaves Canada, but his spouse or dependants remain in Canada, the individual will generally be considered to remain a resident of Canada during his absence. ... In such a situation the resident spouse could, for the purpose of computing his eligibility for the CTC, be considered to be residing with his non-resident spouse. ...

In such circumstances the departing spouse would not be considered to have severed his residential ties with Canada. ... " Paragraph 8 "If married individual leaves Canada, but his spouse or dependants remain in Canada, the individual will generally be considered to remain a resident of Canada during his absence. ... In such a situation the resident spouse could, for the purpose of computing his eligibility for the CTC, be considered to be residing with his non-resident spouse. ...

Is an employee considered to have established a self- contained domestic establishment (SCDE) if he can only do so by means of the employer-provided housing? If the answer to the first question is that a place cannot be considered remote because the employee could establish a SCDE by means of an employer-provided dwelling, would the place then be considered remote for a single employee who does not qualify for employer- provided housing but is placed in a bunkhouse instead? ... We are unable to provide a checklist of services required that would be considered a minimum level of services. ...

Is an employee considered to have established a self-contained domestic establishment (SCDE) if he can only do so by means of the employer-provided housing? If the answer to the first question is that a place cannot be considered remote because the employee could establish a SCDE by means of an employer-provided dwelling, would the place then be considered remote for a single employee who does not qualify for employer-provided housing but is placed in a bunkhouse instead? ... We are unable to provide a checklist of services required that would be considered a minimum level of services. ...

You are concerned that paragraph 2 of Article 4 ("Article 4(2)") of the Convention may preclude a Society from being considered a resident of Australia. In our opinion the negotiators of the Convention intended that exempt organizations, such as a Society, be considered resident in the country in which they were organized.  Accordingly, we are of the view that Article 4(2) of the Convention would not preclude a Society from being considered resident in Australia for purposes of the Convention. ...