Search - considered

  [15]         The Province of British Columbia considered the Appellant to have been resident in British Columbia in 2008 for the purposes of its Medical Services Plan. ...   [29]         The question of the meaning of “principal place of residence” in paragraph 6(6)(a) has previously been considered by this Court. ...

  [4]              Additional materials (although not necessarily relevant nor properly produced at the Hearing by the Appellants) were, with the consent of the Respondent, received and considered by the Court subsequent to the Hearing. ...   [18]         In deciding this procedural matter, the Court considered the arguments of the parties and indicated its strong inclination that the request for the amendment to insert the section 8 Charter violation arose primarily due to the negligence of the Appellants’ agent in preparing his Notice of Appeal. ...

Accordingly, and even though Kenrick Sproule says that he considered this situation based on Exhibit E appended to his affidavit dated October 6, 2006, it is appropriate under subsections or paragraphs 400(1), (3), (3)(o), (4) and (6)(c) of the Rules to reduce the amount claimed under Exhibit E to $8,000.00 and to award under these same rules the amounts claimed under Exhibits F and G of the same affidavit, namely a total of $11,477.09 in costs. [41]            Accordingly, an order will be issued.   ... Plaintiff and THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY Defendant     MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED IN MONTRÉAL WITHOUT APPEARANCE BY PARTIES   REASONS FOR ORDER:      PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU   DATED:                                    November 23, 2006       WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:   J. ...

U-Compute, 2005 FC 1644, the Court identified three factors to be considered in imposing a penalty for contempt, at paragraph 76:   76.      ... No. 341, this Court summarized the relevant factors to be considered in framing a penalty. ...

This issue will be considered next. Is Ms. Sherman's Application for Judicial Review Premature? ... There is also the possibility that the tribunal may end up modifying its original ruling as the hearing unfolds. [41]            As to what may be considered to be "special circumstances", Justice Sharlow gave the following examples in Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. ...

In particular, I have considered the importance of the question and its applicability to numerous future cases, and the relative lack of expertise of the Appeal Panel on questions of statutory interpretation.   12     The Tribunal must make a correct interpretation of the Act on this issue and so, in this sense, the question goes to the jurisdiction of the Civil Aviation Tribunal. ...     [24]            The application of criminal law doctrine to the regulatory regime created under the Act was previously considered by the Federal Court of Appeal in Boyd v. ...

Each of these will be considered in turn.   Was Mr. Mann in Default of his Obligation to File a 2005 Tax Return? ... This issue will be considered next.   Should the Jeopardy Order be Continued? ...

The paragraphs above referred to from his decision clearly indicate that he fully considered the relevant provisions of the Act. ... Randa 8, the Court considered the application of the limitation period commencing either upon the deposit of the post-dated cheques or from their maturity dates. ...

S-3.1 (the " School Act").       4.The School Act provides that the annual two-day professional development seminar known as Teachers' Convention ("Teachers" Convention") are considered "teaching days".       5.The School Act also provides that the Employer shall deduct 0.5% of the Plaintiff's annual teacher's salary for each teaching day that the Plaintiff is absent, unless the absence is approved by the Employer or the Minister of Education or relates to medical illness, disability or treatment.       6.During the Taxation Years, the nearest Teachers' Convention was held in the City of Grande Prairie, which is approximately 200 kilometres away from the Town of Peace River.       7.In attending Teachers' Convention during the Taxation Years, the Plaintiff incurred the following travelling expenses:         Description      1986      1987      1988 Hotel $ 50.00 $ 34.00 $ 38.00 Meals (Alberta Government Rate) 57.00 57.00 57.00 Car (25"/km) 50.00 50.00 50.00 TOTAL $157.00 $141.00 $145.00         (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Expenses").    8.The Employment Agreement and the School Act do not address the question of who pays for the travelling expenses of a teacher incurred by a teacher in the course of attending Teacher"s [sic] Convention. 9.      ... In making the frequency argument, the Minister advances the proposition that there is a line to be drawn respecting the degree of regularity with which an event occurs before it can be considered to "ordinarily" occur. ...

Unless the Applicant can show that the Respondent ignored relevant evidence, considered irrelevant or extraneous matters, acted in bad faith or that the decision is clearly contrary to law, then this Court should not interfere. [18]            The Respondent argues that the record shows that it considered only relevant matters including its earlier delays in dealing with prior requests by the Applicant and its failure to follow its own procedures in dealing with his second request. ...