Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 4251 - 4260 of 14751 for considered
FCA

Woods v. Canada, 2011 FCA 90

In filing her 2004 income tax return, the appellant considered the $65,000 to be non-taxable life insurance proceeds. ...
FCA

Ohayon v. Canada, 2011 FCA 100

Moreover, where the judge considered the absence of documentary evidence to be problematic, he clearly explained the basis for his concerns and the reasons why he believed such documentation reasonably ought to have existed. ...
FCA

Abrametz v. Canada, 2009 FCA 70

In so doing, she considered the evidence of the appellant’s witness, Mr. ...
FCA

Golden v. Canada, 2009 FCA 86

  [5]                The Tax Court Judge found that in the criminal proceedings the Manitoba courts had refused to order further disclosure of material by the Crown, including material seized by the CRA which Mr Golden now has in his possession and says should be considered in the tax appeals. ...
FCA

Pelletier v. Canada, 2010 FCA 300

However, they should have been expressly considered in the judge’s determination and in my view they were not ...
FCA

Canada v. Collins & Aikman Canada Inc., 2010 FCA 251

Having considered the Crown’s written and oral submissions, we are not persuaded that Mr. ...
FCA

Lavoie v. Canada, 2010 FCA 266

  [5]                In finding the payments to be income from a source the Judge considered and rejected the appellant's argument that the payments were a windfall.  ...
FCA

3234339 Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2006 FCA 308

  [10]            Contrary to the appellant’s counsel, I do not believe however that, based on the workers’ failure to intervene regarding their status, the judge inferred that the workers considered themselves to be employees or that their silence was an expression of their intention with regard to the legal status of their employment. ...
FCA

Venneri v. Canada, 2006 FCA 165

  [2]                First of all, in detailed and meticulous reasons in support of the impugned conclusions, the judge ruled that the loss claimed by the appellant could not be considered a business investment loss within the meaning of paragraph 39(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (“Act”). ...
FCA

St-Onge v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FCA 109

)   [6]                To reach this finding of fact, the judge considered that the appellants did not testify, did not have the so-called third director testify, and simply submitted documentary evidence concerning the allocation of the company’s shares among the three shareholders, that is, themselves and Jean-Claude Leblanc ...

Pages