Search - considered

The narrow issue is whether, in deciding whether these weapons which were attempted to be landed are "offensive weapons" and, therefore, prohibited from being landed, the judicial interpretations under the Criminal Code must be considered? ...

In my opinion, the mere presence of these allegations in an affidavit cannot be considered to disclose a "special reason" within the meaning of Rule 319(4) " and the case law construing this Rule " sufficient to obtain the Court"s leave to overrule the general scheme for hearing motions under Rule 319(2).      ...

As well, your repeated late filing, and allowing a balance to remain outstanding for such a long period of time could not be considered as beyond your reasonable care and control. ...

All of the other costs are undisputed and are considered necessary charges to the conduct of this matter. ...

The second day, June 13, 2006, is considered a full day as according to the hearing transcript the trial lasted from 9:28 am to 12:15 pm and from 2 pm to 5:45 pm. ...

  [4] Disbursements are typically considered compensation in payment for a service provided by a third party. ...

[6]                I am bound by that finding and do not propose to review the jurisprudence that the Federal Court of Appeal already considered in arriving at that conclusion ...

[10]            Having considered all the evidence, the Court is satisfied that the Minister has met the test outlined in the Income Tax Act. [11]            In addition, the debtors have not convinced the Court that the Minister did not meet his obligation of reasonable disclosure. [12]            Consequently, the debtors’ application is dismissed with costs and the jeopardy collection order is upheld.  ...

. […] 2) Le délinquant qui croit que les renseignements auxquels il a eu accès en vertu du paragraphe 23(2) sont erronés ou incomplets peut demander que le Service en effectue la correction; lorsque la demande est refusée, le Service doit faire mention des corrections qui ont été demandées mais non effectuées. [4]                In this case, the applicant claims to have not followed the procedure set out in subsection 24(2) of the Act. [5]                However, the applicant should not have more rights than another inmate who is pursuing remedies under the Act, so the applicant cannot proceed directly through an action. [6]                Furthermore, if the applicant requested that information in his record be corrected, and he is not satisfied with the reply he received, he had to have this Court conduct a judicial review of that reply, which he did not do. [7]                Indeed, as extensively explained by the respondent, only an application for judicial review can determine the lawfulness of this reply or decision. [8]                Here, the applicant cannot collaterally attack a decision by a tribunal by means of an action for damages to avoid parceling out the review of the lawfulness of decisions by federal bodies. [9]                Furthermore, even if we considered, as claimed by the applicant in his motion record against the motion under review, that the central premise of his action for damages is not founded on the decision to deny the withdrawal of a statement obtained from the applicant, but rather that the applicant is seeking to properly bring an action against respondent Séguin for false and malicious allegations, this action, despite the wording of paragraph 17(5)(b) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. ...

”   [3]                I have considered the submissions of the parties and have noted that the applicable sections of the legislation do, in certain situations, provide for the release of taxpayer information and personal information. ...