Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 331 - 340 of 655 for considered
News of Note post
6 November 2019- 11:58pm CRA assimilates a loan to a royalty agreement and finds that the principal advanced in fact was subject to GST/HST Email this Content CRA considered a situation in which a financing of a company with product sales was bifurcated into a non-interest-bearing loan and a royalty agreement. ...
News of Note post
However, in “this situation…GAAR must be considered” (see e.g., Iberville re using s. 85 to avoid rather than defer tax). ...
News of Note post
CRA stated that “we would likely conclude that the LP is not an ILP and further information would be required to determine if the LP … is considered an ILP at a later time. ...
News of Note post
In CRA’s view, this then engaged ETA s. 128(4), which provides that for qualifying voting control purposes, a person is not considered to own shares if another person (other than a closely-related person) has voting rights over those shares described in similar terms to ITA s. 251(5)((b)(i), e.g., a “right under a contract … to control the voting rights attached to the share.” ...
News of Note post
Such transfer was considered as an abuse of ss. 107(2), (2.1) and (5). ...
News of Note post
S. 120.4(1.1)(b)(ii) was so engaged on the basis of a CRA position that that property received from an inter vivos trust, the terms of which unconditionally require that it distribute the property to the individual on the death of another person, can be considered as property acquired by the individual as a consequence of that person’s death. ...
News of Note post
A, CRA indicated that any taxable dividends received by him are considered to be derived directly or indirectly from such investment business – so that, since he is not actively engaged in that business, such amounts will not be “derived directly or indirectly from an excluded business” of Mr. ...
News of Note post
Boivin JA stated (at para. 7): [These] remarks … were ill-considered. ...
News of Note post
Favel J considered it to be unreasonable for the CRA delegate not to take the three-year delay of CRA in responding to the Objection into account in considering the interest-relief request, so that the matter was “remitted to another Delegate for redetermination of the Applicant’s entitlement to relief from interest accrued due only to delays caused by the CRA.” ...
News of Note post
Before remitting the matter to another delegate for redetermination, LeBlanc J stated: [The estate] has the right to see the Agreement considered and to know why it was not applied in this case, if that was the CRA viewpoint. ...

Pages