Search - considered
Results 18951 - 18960 of 19014 for considered
Ruling
30 November 1996 Ruling 9604823 - BUTTERFLY
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 40.To the best of your knowledge, and that of the parties to this ruling, none of the issues involved in the requested rulings is being considered by a tax services office or a taxation centre in connection with an income tax return already filed, or is under objection or appeal. 41.There will not be, as part of the series of transactions or events that includes the proposed transactions described herein, any (a) disposition of property in the circumstances described in subparagraph 55(3.1)(b)(i), (b) acquisition of control in the circumstances described in subparagraph 55(3.1)(b)(ii), (c) acquisition of property in the circumstances described in paragraph 55(3.1)(c), (d) acquisition of property in the circumstances described in paragraph 55(3.1)(d), which has not been described herein. 42.Other than as a result of the proposed amalgamation of the Subject Corporations described in paragraph 28 of Proposed Transactions, no property has or will become property of any of the Subject Corporations or Amalco in contemplation of the proposed transactions. 43.None of the shares referred to in this ruling application is or will be subject to a guarantee agreement, within the meaning of subsection 112(2.2) of the Act, that is given by a person or partnership (other than the issuer of the share or an individual other than a trust), that is a specified financial institution or a specified person in relation to such an institution. 44.None of the shares described herein have been or will be issued or acquired as part of a transaction or event or series of transactions or events of the type described in subsection 112(2.5) of the Act. 45.None of the shares described herein has been or will be the subject of a dividend rental arrangement as that term is defined in subsection 248(1) of the Act. ...
Ruling
30 November 1996 Ruling 9725063 - splitting up a mutual fund trust
We understand that none of the issues involved in the ruling request, to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers involved: i) is in an earlier return of the taxpayers or a related person, ii) is being considered by an office of Revenue Canada in connection with a previously filed tax return of the taxpayers or a related person, iii) is under objection by the taxpayers or a related person, iv) is before the courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired, and v) is the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate to the taxpayers or a related person. ...
Ruling
30 November 1996 Ruling 9722663 - BUTTERFLY REORGANIZATION
We understand that, to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues involved in the requested rulings is being considered by a tax services office or a taxation centre in connection with a tax return already filed, or is under objection or appeal. ...
Ruling
30 November 1997 Ruling 9727303 - BUTTERFLY
To the best of your knowledge and the knowledge of the responsible officers of the taxpayers involved none of the issues involved in the requested rulings is being considered by a Tax Services Office or Taxation Centre in connection with an income tax return already filed and none of the issues involved is subject to a notice of objection under section 165 of the Income Tax Act or is otherwise under appeal. ...
Ruling
30 November 1997 Ruling 9727223 - XXXXXXXXXX DPS
Provided that the Loan arose from one or more loans or "lending assets", within the meaning of subsection 248(1) of the Act, made or acquired by the relevant Lender in the course of its insurance or money-lending business, any Loan reacquired by that Lender as described in 27 a) or b) above, will be considered to have been acquired by the Lender in the ordinary course of its business of insurance or lending money, as the case may be, for the purposes of paragraph 20(1)(l) and 20(1)(p) of the Act. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal
4 June 2003 Internal T.I. 2003-0006967 F - Province de résidence d'une fiducie
In other words, the subparagraph 75(2)(a)(i) condition would not be considered satisfied from the potential acquisition of the property from the spouse's estate in accordance with the spouse's will. ...
Ruling
2003 Ruling 2003-0044483 - SDA DEFERRED SHARE UNITS
We understand that, to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayer, none of the issues involved in the ruling request is: (i) in an earlier return of the taxpayer or a related person, (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of the taxpayer or a related person, (iii) under objection by the taxpayer or a related person, (iv) before the courts, or (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate to the taxpayer or a related person. ...
Ruling
2004 Ruling 2004-0074311R3 - Income Trust
We understand that to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers involved none of the issues involved in this ruling is: (i) in an earlier return of a taxpayer identified in this document or of a related person, (ii) being considered by any Tax Services Office or Taxation Center of the CRA in connection with a tax return already filed, (iii) under objection by a taxpayer identified in this document or by a related person, (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired, (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate to the taxpayer or a related person. ...
Ruling
2001 Ruling 2000-0053013 - Loss Consolidation
To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues contained herein: (i) is in an earlier return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (ii) is being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iii) is under objection by one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iv) is before the courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired; or (v) is the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate. ...
Ruling
2002 Ruling 2002-0139163 - PARTNERSHIP; MUTUAL FUND
To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues contained herein is: (i) dealt with in an earlier return of the taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of one or any of the taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by one or any of the taxpayers or a related person; (iv) subject to a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate; or (v) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired. ...