Search - consideration

I shall deal with it after consideration of the second preliminary objection. [59]     In Smith Kline Beecham Animal Health Inc. v. ...

The various representations received and all relevant elements will be taken into full consideration. ...

After a consideration of a number of cases the Court found that the directors tried to resolve the GST difficulty after the bank refused to allow the Company to issue cheques. ...

This consideration was crucial due the amounts owed to her company and herself.” ...

[combined] $939,596.92 TOTAL $994,730.97 (i)         this ITC amount of $994,730.97 corresponds to a consideration of some $19,894,619.42 for such supplies, which the appellant claims to have acquired during the relevant period from those four alleged suppliers, namely: 6650261 Canada inc. ...

MUSIC (“Company”) And Michael Watson (“Independent Consultant”) in consideration of the mutual agreement and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follow [sic]:   1.       ...

Palmquist to Ichi on February 1, 1984, to that effect thus having the potential to eliminate Ichi's anticipated refund to be generated out of its requested amendment to its 1980 and 1981 taxation years thus impacting on Ichi's authorization to use its refund to reduce its shareholder loan for the purpose of providing consideration to the offset which would pay off Mr. ...

Furthermore, the relevant provisions of the Act are unconstitutional in that they are contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [4]                Consequently, and in order to better appreciate the scope and nature of this action, consideration must be given to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act MONEY LAUNDERING ACT [5]                An Act to facilitate combating the laundering of proceeds of crime and combating the financing of terrorist activities, to establish the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada and to amend and repeal certain Acts in consequence, was assented to 29th, June, 2000. ...

  [81]            Finally, in the alternative, he argues if the correct standard of review is unreasonableness, that standard has been met particularly flowing from the fact (1) the 2002 Ruling was erroneously not taken into account because Montreal TSO did not have the complete text of the Ruling (2) it is unreasonable in the circumstance to assimilate a blank space in the original tax return as in effect being a claim for RITC which the taxpayer made barring him from even making a claim in the future because he did not timely object to that blank space (3) the decision-maker took into account irrelevant considerations such as; a) the Directive; b) to issue a Notice of Determination would grant Signalgene a right of appeal; and c) tax planning by Signalgene.               ...

Only where this search proves fruitless must the reviewing court undertake a consideration of the four factors comprising the standard of review analysis ...