Search - consideration
Results 91 - 100 of 5733 for consideration
TCC
ONR Limited Partnership v. The King, 2024 TCC 156
COUNSEL FOR THE LP: That is still under consideration and [I] wanted to assess how the remainder of the evidence proceeds. ... There was no evidence indicating that the Agency Agreements lacked consideration, or were null and void, or otherwise did not exist. ... In turn, this requires me to determine whether the LP was liable to pay the consideration for the supply of the Services. ...
TCC
Desmarais v. The Queen, 2006 DTC 2376, 2006 TCC 44
It would seem to follow that consideration of legislative purpose may not only resolve patent ambiguity, but may, on occasion, reveal ambiguity in apparently plain language. ... The basic rule under new subsection 84.1(1) is that the maximum amount that can be received by the transferor from the transferee corporation as proceeds in the form of any non-share consideration and the paid-up capital of the share consideration is restricted to the greater of the paid-up capital of the transferred shares and what could be called the actual non-arm's length adjusted cost base to the transferor of the shares. ... This was the mechanism by which 6311 used the surpluses from Gestion to redeem the 123,000 class D shares that had been issued in consideration of the shares of Comsercom. ...
TCC
Harvey v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 67 (Informal Procedure)
E-15 [2] The legislative provision in question is a recovery measure that allows the Minister to assess an individual when he or she receives property from a tax debtor with whom he or she is not dealing with at arm’s length for an insufficient consideration, i.e. for less than the fair market value (the “FMV”) of the property at the time of the transfer. [3] The appellant acquired a property located at 45 Whistler Street, in Saint-David-de-Falardeau, in Quebec (“the building”) on April 19, 2012 (the “reference date”), from Frédéric Girard, who was at that time his daughter’s partner. ... Girard was indebted to the Minister in the amount of $163,806.23. [4] The appellant does not question the presence of a transfer, a consideration, a non-arm’s length relationship or an underlying tax liability and therefore the issue solely addresses the FMV of the consideration. [5] Although the value of the consideration at the time of the transfer was $220,000, the appellant claims, for the purposes of this case, that the building’s FMV was in fact $207,000. ... T-358782, March 17, 1983, at page 19 (83 D.T.C. 5148, at page 5157), which reads: While it has frequently been held that a Court should not, after considering all the expert and other evidence merely adopt a figure somewhere between the figure sought by the contending parties, it has also been held that the Court may, when it does not find the evidence of any expert completely satisfying or conclusive, nor any comparable especially apt, form its own opinion of valuation, provided this is always based on the careful consideration of all the conflicting evidence. ...
TCC
Richter & Associates Inc v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 92
Principal considerations in determining such an issue of fact are (1) the nature and the frequency of the act, and (2) the intention of the person concerned. ... Indeed, the non-reimbursed loans would then constitute a consideration for the service that the Participating Creditors received from the Estate. ... Therefore the loans cannot be applied "as consideration for the supply" until it is determined what portion, if any, of the loans will be reimbursed. ...
TCC
Spruce Credit Union v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 42
However, the Court must exercise its discretion on proper principles, such as the considerations enumerated in Rule 147(3), and not capriciously. ... The examples he gave included some of the Rule 147(3) considerations. ... Rule 147(3) Considerations a) The Result of the Proceeding [33] The Appellant was entirely successful in its appeal to this Court. ...
TCC
882885 Ontario Limited v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 131
There was no carry-forward of the charitable donation to either 1994 or 1995. [4] The Minister submitted an alternative argument in that the stated consideration of $1,175,000 was a sham and did not reflect the true consideration given for the subject property. ... As you are aware, the consideration exchanged included both cash and a charitable donation receipt. ... A consideration of the four lots would be greater than $37.50 per square foot. [53] Frank Mancini has been the auditor for Mr. ...
TCC
Québecor Inc. v. The King, 2023 TCC 142
As consideration, 3662527 issued 1,000 class “D” preferred shares to Quebecor. ... However, where the consideration exceeds the PUC, the excess is deemed to be a dividend subject to tax. ... These considerations are not independent of one another and may overlap. ...
TCC
Herring v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 41
Position of the Respondent [206] The Respondent submits that the Appellants lacked donative intent for the entire gift amount arguing that the payments made “were not gifts but consideration under profit-motivated contracts.” ... At common law, where the transferor of the property has received any form of consideration or benefit, it is generally presumed that such an intention is not present. ... It is apparent that the loan was “consideration for the gift” or “in any way related to the gift” in accordance with subparagraphs 248(32)(a)(i) or (iii). ...
TCC
Crane v. The King, 2022 TCC 115
a gift is a voluntary transfer of property owned by a donor to a donee, in return for which no benefit or consideration flows to the donor (...) ... Canada [2001] 4 CTC 54 (FCA) it was held that “obtaining a receipt from a charitable organization could not be viewed as consideration that would eliminate the gratuitous and liberal nature of the transaction” (para. 8) and in Mariano v. ... In consideration for that payment, the Appellant expected an addition of $47,000 to his investment portfolio along with a same-day, limited recourse, partially secured, self-funding loan of $89,000. ...
TCC
Greer v. The King, 2023 TCC 100
First, the Crown must prove that the Appellant made a misrepresentation in filing his 2005 return by failing to report a shareholder benefit on acquiring, for no consideration, four properties from HGSL worth more than $2.4 million. ... He knew that HGSL owned the properties and that they were transferred to him for no consideration. ... He found that the corporation conferred a benefit on its shareholder by transferring the shares of its subsidiary to him for inadequate consideration. ...