Search - consideration

Results 11 - 20 of 5753 for consideration
TCC

Leigh v. R., [1999] 1 CTC 2239

The only consideration that Kathryn Marino gave for the shares was time spent with the Company. ... He agreed that the wife paid no consideration to the company for the proceeds of the sale of the Company’s property. ... Further, with respect to the matter of consideration, even if there were no asset in the company the husband taxpayer received the total value of the company’s interest and therefore that was his consideration. ...
TCC

The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. The King, 2024 TCC 50

[15] The first step is to determine what goods and/or services were provided for the consideration received. ... Consideration [224] In ordinary usage, the term “gift certificate” would describe a device that was issued for consideration. ... Section 181.2 denies its beneficial tax treatment to a device if the device is not issued for consideration, but it does not require a device to have been issued for consideration for it to be a gift certificate. [227] In addition, section 181.2 only says that there has to be consideration. ...
TCC

Sifto Canada Corp. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 37

We presented the adjustments to the IRS for their consideration to provide relief. ... Subsection 169(2.2) itself is “ for greater certainty ” and does not mean that consideration only passes if there is a written waiver. [118]    The consideration from the CCA is the agreement to implement the competent authority settlement if the Appellant concurs. ... (“Compass”) request for competent authority consideration for the taxable year ended February 28, 2002- February 28, 2007. ...
TCC

Wholistic Child and Family Services Inc. v. M.N.R., 2016 TCC 34

The same lack of clarity and precision exists in the French version. [12]         However, on the facts of this case, the significance of there not being a comma does not affect the consideration of the argument of the Appellant’s representative that a placement or employment agency only describes a business that is paid a fee by the worker. ... This happened very rarely. [47]         The worker was required to have access to a computer or fax to deliver an invoice of her hours to Wholistic on a twice‑monthly basis. [48]         On balance, these sorts of tool‑related considerations are often not very helpful in determining whether or not a worker is an employee. ... Profit and Loss/Financial Considerations [49]         The worker’s hourly rate of pay was set at $16 in the agreement, an amount that was acceptable to Wholistic and her. ...
TCC

Badour v. M.N.R., 2014 TCC 279

Other Considerations [39]         A limited number of clients could charge their cab fare and would provide some sort of voucher for the ride. When this happened the worker would be paid his 40% share as if the voucher was a cash receipt and the appellant was the one who had to wait until the charge was actually paid to the customer. [40]         There was no evidence that the worker hired anyone to replace him. [41]         Both of these considerations point away from self‑employment. ...
TCC

Lehigh Hanson Materials Limited v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 205

All of which remain in issue and form “the factual crux” of the case. [43]          The existence of factual disputes does not preclude the granting of a Rule 58 motion, however, this remains a relevant consideration to a Court’s consideration as to whether a determination of a proposed question may substantially shorten the hearing or save costs. [39] [44]          In McIntyre, HSBC and Suncor, the Court held in each instance that there should never be a dispute as to a material fact underpinning a question of law. [40] In addition to the above disputed material facts, the respondent denies the facts in paragraphs 20 to 28 of Lehigh’s pleading which were pled by Lehigh in support of its position that technological advancement was sought and achieved and technological uncertainty existed. ... Other considerations and the circumstances [47]          The repetitive and permissive language in Rule 58 confirms that the motions judge is not limited to considering only the statutory conditions in subsections 58(1) and (2) of the Rules. [41] The motions judge has the discretion to consider other factors, together with all the circumstances of the case, in order to decide whether the proposed question is appropriate for a Rule 58 determination. [42] [48]          In Banque National, former Chief Justice Bowman considered a motion that was based on a previous iteration of Rule 58. ...
TCC

Gaudet v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2562

A rule which bars an entire class of persons from certain forms of employment, solely on the grounds of a lack of citizenship status and without consideration of educational and professional qualifications or the other attributes or merits of individuals in the group, would, in my view, infringe s. 15 equality rights. ... It cannot consider the transportation division of Petro Canada as a separate entity, and therefore cannot conclude that the appellant's employer was a person whose principal business was passenger, goods, or passenger and goods transport, within the meaning of paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act. 50 The appellant's appeal would therefore be dismissed if the argument with respect to the Charter was not considered. 4.04 Decision with respect to paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act taking into consideration the Charter 51 4.04.1 The respondent argued that paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act does not distinguish on the basis of the appellant's personal characteristics but on the nature of the employer's business (4.02.2 (b)). 52 The overall position of counsel for the appellant can be summarized as follows: The appellant is an employee of a company, one of the activities of which is goods transport, but said activity is not the principal business of the company. 53 The appellant is not the only person in that situation in Canada. ...
TCC

Tétrault v. The Queen, 2004 TCC 332 (Informal Procedure)

Tétrault did not work in consideration of a wage and the sums that Mr. ... But what was that consideration? Can it be said that the paying of household expenses is consideration for the transfers? ... The mere right to be the beneficiary of this obligation does not constitute a particular consideration. ...
TCC

Harvard Properties Inc. v. The King, 2024 TCC 139

It does not address the tax considerations of a sale of the shopping centre, nor the differing results or considerations of a share sale versus a sale of the shopping centre itself. ... Doner, and the tax consequences, considerations and risks to the Abacus proposal. ... The other consideration received by each co-owner was its share of the Deposits. ...
TCC

British Columbia Transit v. The Queen, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437

Consideration [45]     Was there or was there not consideration for the lease? ... "Nominal consideration" and a "nominal sum" in the law appear to me, as terms of art, to refer to a sum or consideration which can be mentioned as consideration but is not necessarily paid. ... The comparison, if indeed a comparison is necessary, should be between the actual consideration and a fair market value (FMV) consideration. ...

Pages