Search - consideration
Results 11 - 20 of 5733 for consideration
TCC
Sifto Canada Corp. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 37
We presented the adjustments to the IRS for their consideration to provide relief. ... Subsection 169(2.2) itself is “ for greater certainty ” and does not mean that consideration only passes if there is a written waiver. [118] The consideration from the CCA is the agreement to implement the competent authority settlement if the Appellant concurs. ... (“Compass”) request for competent authority consideration for the taxable year ended February 28, 2002- February 28, 2007. ...
TCC
Wholistic Child and Family Services Inc. v. M.N.R., 2016 TCC 34
The same lack of clarity and precision exists in the French version. [12] However, on the facts of this case, the significance of there not being a comma does not affect the consideration of the argument of the Appellant’s representative that a placement or employment agency only describes a business that is paid a fee by the worker. ... This happened very rarely. [47] The worker was required to have access to a computer or fax to deliver an invoice of her hours to Wholistic on a twice‑monthly basis. [48] On balance, these sorts of tool‑related considerations are often not very helpful in determining whether or not a worker is an employee. ... Profit and Loss/Financial Considerations [49] The worker’s hourly rate of pay was set at $16 in the agreement, an amount that was acceptable to Wholistic and her. ...
TCC
Badour v. M.N.R., 2014 TCC 279
Other Considerations [39] A limited number of clients could charge their cab fare and would provide some sort of voucher for the ride. When this happened the worker would be paid his 40% share as if the voucher was a cash receipt and the appellant was the one who had to wait until the charge was actually paid to the customer. [40] There was no evidence that the worker hired anyone to replace him. [41] Both of these considerations point away from self‑employment. ...
TCC
Lehigh Hanson Materials Limited v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 205
All of which remain in issue and form “the factual crux” of the case. [43] The existence of factual disputes does not preclude the granting of a Rule 58 motion, however, this remains a relevant consideration to a Court’s consideration as to whether a determination of a proposed question may substantially shorten the hearing or save costs. [39] [44] In McIntyre, HSBC and Suncor, the Court held in each instance that there should never be a dispute as to a material fact underpinning a question of law. [40] In addition to the above disputed material facts, the respondent denies the facts in paragraphs 20 to 28 of Lehigh’s pleading which were pled by Lehigh in support of its position that technological advancement was sought and achieved and technological uncertainty existed. ... Other considerations and the circumstances [47] The repetitive and permissive language in Rule 58 confirms that the motions judge is not limited to considering only the statutory conditions in subsections 58(1) and (2) of the Rules. [41] The motions judge has the discretion to consider other factors, together with all the circumstances of the case, in order to decide whether the proposed question is appropriate for a Rule 58 determination. [42] [48] In Banque National, former Chief Justice Bowman considered a motion that was based on a previous iteration of Rule 58. ...
TCC
Gaudet v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2562
A rule which bars an entire class of persons from certain forms of employment, solely on the grounds of a lack of citizenship status and without consideration of educational and professional qualifications or the other attributes or merits of individuals in the group, would, in my view, infringe s. 15 equality rights. ... It cannot consider the transportation division of Petro Canada as a separate entity, and therefore cannot conclude that the appellant's employer was a person whose principal business was passenger, goods, or passenger and goods transport, within the meaning of paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act. 50 The appellant's appeal would therefore be dismissed if the argument with respect to the Charter was not considered. 4.04 Decision with respect to paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act taking into consideration the Charter 51 4.04.1 The respondent argued that paragraph 8(1)(g) of the Act does not distinguish on the basis of the appellant's personal characteristics but on the nature of the employer's business (4.02.2 (b)). 52 The overall position of counsel for the appellant can be summarized as follows: The appellant is an employee of a company, one of the activities of which is goods transport, but said activity is not the principal business of the company. 53 The appellant is not the only person in that situation in Canada. ...
TCC
Tétrault v. The Queen, 2004 TCC 332 (Informal Procedure)
Tétrault did not work in consideration of a wage and the sums that Mr. ... But what was that consideration? Can it be said that the paying of household expenses is consideration for the transfers? ... The mere right to be the beneficiary of this obligation does not constitute a particular consideration. ...
TCC
Harvard Properties Inc. v. The King, 2024 TCC 139
It does not address the tax considerations of a sale of the shopping centre, nor the differing results or considerations of a share sale versus a sale of the shopping centre itself. ... Doner, and the tax consequences, considerations and risks to the Abacus proposal. ... The other consideration received by each co-owner was its share of the Deposits. ...
TCC
British Columbia Transit v. The Queen, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437
Consideration [45] Was there or was there not consideration for the lease? ... "Nominal consideration" and a "nominal sum" in the law appear to me, as terms of art, to refer to a sum or consideration which can be mentioned as consideration but is not necessarily paid. ... The comparison, if indeed a comparison is necessary, should be between the actual consideration and a fair market value (FMV) consideration. ...
TCC
Republic National Bank of New York v. The Queen, docket 96-2492-GST-G
The remainder of the $14,011,901.42 is apparently interest owed to Yarkon. [90] For the purposes of section 183, the value of consideration is defined by subsection 153(1), which states: 153. (1) Value of consideration-- Subject to this Division, the value of the consideration, or any part thereof, for a supply shall, for the purposes of this Part, be deemed to be equal to (a) where the consideration or that part is expressed in money, the amount of the money; and (b) where the consideration or that part is other than money, the fair market value of the consideration or that part at the time the supply was made. [91] A common definition used for consideration is that given by Lush J. in Currie v. ... Where the consideration for a supply, or a portion thereof, is other than money, the value of that consideration is equal to the fair market value of the consideration at the time the supply was made. ... The respondent simply argued that such amounts did not constitute consideration. ...
TCC
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 79, aff'd 2021 FCA 96
The purchaser of the voucher in turn generally makes a gift to a third party by handing over the voucher for no consideration. ... As well, in Canasia, then Chief Justice Garon notes that the consideration paid to purchase the gift certificate need not be equal to the stated value “ if one appears on the certificate since the requirement in the latter section is simply that there must be a consideration.” ... The consideration paid for the certificate may not necessarily be the same as the monetary exchange value. 3. ...