Search - connection

The Court considers that there is a sufficient connection between the primary cause of action and the cause of action of the counterclaim to maintain this counterclaim against Eclipse Canada and Trio Selection Inc. [14]            However, with regard to the directors of these two corporations, Eclipse Canada and Trio Selection Inc., namely the six (6) individuals who also appear in the style of cause as defendants by counterclaim, the situation warrants, as mentioned earlier, that the Court intervene. [15]            I think that to assess the situation, it is necessary to apply, mutatis mutandis, the principles referred to by this Court when a party seeks to implicate the personal liability of corporate officers in an intellectual property matter. [16]            In Dolomite Svenska Aktiebolag v. ...

Furthermore, there is sufficient connection between the Applicants (particularly Nesathurai) and Welton Parent Inc. to make them privies. ...

Beaucage did not make the connection between Mr. Beauchamp’s illness and the instructions given to his accountants. ...

In this respect, the RPD’s decision appears, in this case, to be the result of reasonable inferences and thus satisfies the standard of reasonableness. [13]            The applicant also criticized the RPD for having breached the rules of procedural fairness by failing to provide advance notice of its intention to use its specialized knowledge in connection with the medical certificate that she submitted as evidence. ...

However, even in connection with the one point that was expressly raised, that Kudakwashe is attending school in Canada, the Officer noted that fact but failed to conduct any analysis, based on country condition documents or otherwise, as to the effect upon Kudakwashe’s education if her family were to return to Zimbabwe to apply for permanent residence. [16]            I agree with the Respondent’s submission that the best interests of a child, and the fact that a child may be better off in Canada, is not determinative of an H&C application (see Kisana v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189, at para 37). ...

With regards to the authority of the Tribunal to award costs, Section 19 of the TATC Act provides as follows: Costs 19(1) The Tribunal may award any costs, and may require the reimbursement of any expenses incurred in connection with a hearing, that it considers reasonable if (a) it is seized of the matter for reasons that are frivolous or vexatious; (b) a party that files a request for a review or an appeal and does not appear at the hearing does not establish that there was sufficient reason to justify their absence; or (c) a party that is granted an adjournment of the hearing requested the adjournment without adequate notice to the Tribunal. […] If the TATC Act is interpreted in a manner which results in the Tribunal losing jurisdiction only as a result of the withdrawal, the Applicant will be left with no avenue to recover its costs from the Agency. ...

In an addendum in connection with additional allegations of risks related to his political activities in Canada since his arrival, the Officer added that Mr.  ...

S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act") at a "somewhat sedate pace" to quote from Hugessen, J.A. in an earlier stay application in connection with an application to review and set aside a decision of the Tax Court of Canada made under subsection 231.4(2) on a pure question of statutory construction. ...

Often no payee was identified in connection with an expenditure. While the plaintiff asserted that he was regularly owed substantial amounts of money by his company, in only one year was a loan from a shareholder reflected in the books of the company. ...

I am not called upon to decide whether the judgment would then have expressed in Canadian dollars the total of sums expended in Japanese yen at various times during the proceedings in connection with the bail bond and other matters, nor whether interest to date of judgment could have been claimed in the proceedings on the cross-demand which defendant now claims in its subsidiary argument. ...