Search - connection

Results 5931 - 5940 of 7793 for connection
Ruling

2004 Ruling 2004-0080301R3 - sequential spin-off butterflies (no-types-property

To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues involved in this ruling request is (i) in an earlier return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has expired; or (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Ruling

2004 Ruling 2004-0085771R3 - Public Company spin-off - FAPI consequences

To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayer involved, none of the issues contained herein is: (a) dealt with in an earlier return of the taxpayer or a related person; (b) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of the taxpayer or a related person; (c) under objection by the taxpayer or a related person; (d) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate; or (e) before the courts. ...
Ruling

2004 Ruling 2004-0096661R3 - 55(3)(a)

To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues involved in this ruling request is (i) in an earlier return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by one of the taxpayers or a related person; (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has expired; or (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Technical Interpretation - External

27 September 2000 External T.I. 2000-EM20425 - 2000 CTF Paper - Judicial & Adm Developments

I understand that the United States, when faced with the same issue, made legislative amendments to codify restrictions on the deductibility of payments based on public policy grounds, such as punitive damages, bribes, fines and penalties, and expenditures in connection with the illegal sale of controlled substances. ...
Ruling

2001 Ruling 2001-0095623 - Butterfly

You have been advised by your clients that to the best of their knowledge, none of the issues involved in this ruling, as they apply specifically to such parties: (i) is in an earlier return; (ii) is being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return; (iii) is under objection; (iv) is before the courts; or (v) is the subject of a previously issued ruling. ...
Ruling

2002 Ruling 2002-0129763 - XXXXXXXXXX

Except for the transactions that were the subject of an earlier advance income tax ruling dated XXXXXXXXXX, 2001 (#2001-011036- the "Prior Ruling") you have advised us that to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayer involved none of the issues involved in this ruling request: (a) is in an earlier return of the taxpayer or a related person; (b) is being considered by a tax services office ("TSO") or taxation centre ("TC") in connection with a previously filed tax return of the taxpayer or a related person; (c) is under objection by the taxpayer or a related person; (d) is before the courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired; or (e) is the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Ruling

1999 Ruling 9907793 - BUTTERFLY RULING

To the best of your knowledge, and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues contained herein is: (i) dealt with in an earlier return of the taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of the taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by the taxpayers or a related person; (iv) subject to a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings & Interpretations Directorate; or (v) before the courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired. ...
Conference

8 October 1999 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 9M19190 - APFF 1999 ROUND TABLE

We are examining it in connection with preparing the budgetary proposal implementation legislation. ...
Ruling

1999 Ruling 9924993 - XXXXXXXXXX BUTTERFLY - DIVISIVE REORGANIZATION

You have advised that to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers involved none of the issues involved in this ruling request: (a) is involved in an earlier return of the taxpayers or a related person, (b) is being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a tax return already filed by the taxpayers or a related person, (c) is under objection, (d) is before the courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal has not expired, and (e) is the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings and Interpretations Directorate. ...
Ruling

2000 Ruling 2000-0008403 - Public butterfly

To the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers involved, none of the issues contained in this ruling request: i) is in an earlier income tax return of the taxpayers or a related person; ii) is being considered by a Tax Services Office or Taxation Centre in connection with a previously filed income tax return of the taxpayers or a related person; iii) is under objection by the taxpayers or a related person; and iv) is before the Courts or, if a judgement has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher Court has not expired. ...

Pages