Search - connection
Results 2521 - 2530 of 6336 for connection
TCC
Aircotech International Inc. c. M.R.N., 2004 TCC 392
[OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Angers J. [1] This is an appeal from an assessment dated September 20, 2002, by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") against the Appellant in connection with employer and employee employment insurance premiums relating to 21 Workers with respect to 2001. ... Article 1 also provides that the pilot is hired as a self-employed worker who must assume all responsibilities in connection with the performance of his work. [7] Mr. ...
TCC
Family Service London v. M.N.R., docket 2000-4109-EI
Denomy provided room and board on one prior occasion in connection with an individual introduced to her by Mr. ... Williams in connection with his monitoring activities, as Mr. Williams already had experience working with mentally challenged individuals. ...
TCC
Kwawukumey v. The Queen, docket 2001-714-IT-I (Informal Procedure)
Kwawukumey testified he was experiencing similar difficulties with Revenue Canada in connection with the Child Tax Benefit as with Ontario Health in connection with his application for O.H.I.P. ...
TCC
Rao v. The Queen, docket 90-842-IT-O
On this second issue, the parties proceeded principally on the basis of an Agreed Statement as to Facts which statement reads as follows: AGREED STATEMENT AS TO FACTS The Appellant and the Respondent do hereby agree with each other in connection with the truth and accuracy of the following facts and statements: 1. ... He refers further to what are known as the oppression provisions in the said B.C.A.S., namely: 234(1) A complainant may apply to a court for an order under this section. (2) If, upon an application under subsection (1), the court is satisfied that in respect of a corporation or any of its affiliates: (a) any act or omission of the corporation or any of its affiliates affects a result; (b) the business or affairs of the corporation or any of its affiliates are or have been carried on or conducted in a manner; or (c) the powers of the directors of the corporation or any of its affiliates are or have been exercised in a manner; that is oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to or that unfairly disregards the interests of any security holder, creditor, director or officer, the court may make an order to rectify the matters complained of. (3) In connection with an application under this section, the court may make any interim or final order it thinks fit including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (a) an order restraining the conduct complained of; (b) an order appointing a receiver or receiver-manager; (c) an order to regulate a corporation's affairs by amending the articles or bylaws or creating or amending a unanimous shareholder agreement; (d) an order directing an issue or exchange of securities; (e) an order appointing directors in place of or in addition to all or any of the directors in office; (f) an order directing a corporation, subject to subsection (6), or any other person, to purchase securities of a security holder; (g) an order directing a corporation, subject to subsection (6), or any other person, to pay to a security holder any part of the moneys paid by him for securities; (h) an order varying or setting aside a transaction or contract to which a corporation is a party and compensating the corporation or any other party to the transaction or contract; (i) an order requiring a corporation, within a time specified by the court, to produce to the court or an interested person financial statements in the form required by section 149 or an accounting in such other form as the court may determine; (j) an order compensating an aggrieved person; (k) an order directing rectification of the registers or other records of a corporation under section 236; (l) an order liquidating and dissolving the corporation; (m) an order directing an investigation under Division XVII to be made; (n) an order requiring the trial of any issue. (4) If an order made under this section directs amendment of the articles or bylaws of a corporation: (a) the directors shall forthwith comply with subsection (4) of section 185; and (b) no other amendment to the articles or bylaws shall be made without the consent of the court, until a court otherwise orders. (5) A shareholder is not entitled to dissent under section 184 if an amendment to the articles is effected under this section. (6) A corporation shall not make a payment to a shareholder under clause (f) or (g) of subsection (3) of there are reasonable grounds for believing that: (a) the corporation is or would after that payment be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or (b) the realizable value of the corporation's assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of its liabilities. (7) An applicant under this section may apply in the alternative for an order under section 207. ...
TCC
Tobias v. The Queen, docket 97-1958-IT-I (Informal Procedure)
Where a person has severed his connection with the corporation of which he is a director, such action relieves the person of vicarious liability for the corporation's default in remitting deductions at source. ... I am satisfied that reasonable grounds existed for the appellant's belief that he had severed his connection with the Company as director and secretary-treasurer and concomitantly his responsibility for it when he placed his resignation in the hands of the Company's president and it was accepted by him. ...
TCC
Cardella v. The Queen, docket 96-3792-IT-G
He earns income from the practice of that profession and from teaching. [3] At issue is the deductibility in computing the Appellant's income of expenses incurred in connection with two limited partnership units held by him, namely, one unit of Gerrard Associates Limited Partnership ("GA") and one unit of Collegeway Associates Limited Partnership ("CA"). [4] GA was formed in December 1986 with a view to acquiring a rental real estate project at 86 Gerrard Street East, Toronto, Ontario. ... He asserted that there exists no requirement that expenses incurred in connection with such adventures be deferred and added to the cost of the property which is the subject of the adventure. ...
TCC
Evergreen Forestry Services Ltd. v. The Queen, docket 96-3731-GST-I (Informal Procedure)
Glengarry Bingo Association. [4] Both counsel have now acted on my invitation to make submissions in writing as to the impact of that decision on this case. [22] The Glengarry case raised the question whether a relationship of agency existed between Glengarry Bingo Association and the various charitable organizations which were members of it, in the context of an assessment for GST in connection with the furnishing by Glengarry to its members of the services of certain staff, and the provision to them of supplies, both for use in the operation of bingo events. ... Canada, [5] that the Court should take a common-sense approach to questions arising in connection with this legislation. ...
TCC
Chanor Truck Repairs Ltd. v. M.N.R., docket 98-109-CPP
Pittman had had some trouble with Dean Muir in connection with the subject matter of item number 2. [14] As stated above, the issue is whether Dean Muir was an employee of the Appellant or an independent contractor. ... It had nothing to do with a business connection between Dean Muir and the Appellant's customers. ...
TCC
Lemmex v. The Queen, docket 98-361-IT-G
., 77 DTC 5198 at pp. 5200-5201: Finally, I should say on this point that the material submitted in support of this application does not, in my opinion, provide a reasonably arguable case for an exercise of judicial discretion increasing the fees for services of solicitors and counsel in connection with this appeal. ... All that has been established here is that the respondent incurred a very large solicitor and client bill in connection with the appeal, which would have been relevant if costs had been awarded on a solicitor and client basis but is not ordinarily relevant to the determination of costs on a party and party basis. ...
TCC
Trela v. The Queen, docket 1999-3424(IT)I (Informal Procedure)
The Appellants' evidence, specifically the Appellant Krystyna Trela, was that she gave all her receipts and all the records that she had in connection with the business to an accountant by the name of Barbara at a firm by the name of Pagett's Accounting. ... It is for that reason only that the income statement had some relevance to her. [9] There is no appeal before me in relation to the goods and services tax and the income statements, which were admitted into evidence as Exhibit A-2, have no relevance in connection with determining the accuracy or lack of it, of the net worth determinations of income of the two partners. ...