Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

III.   POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES A.   Applicant’s position [24]   Mr. Soucy argues that the Commission erred (1) in recognizing that Mr.  ... The current version of the Act, which came into force in 2005, sets out a version of the merit principle which emphasizes individual merit rather than comparative merit, which gives greater flexibility to managers, who may also make use of any assessment method (sections 30 and 36 of the Act; Tibbs at para 63; Lahlali at para 18; Kane at para 8; Seck at para 26). ... IV.   Decision [37]   The Court agrees with the respondent’s position concerning the standard of review. ...

III.   Arguments and analysis [11]   The applicant makes three arguments. ... A.   Adequacy of reasons [12]   Let’s dispose first of the last argument. ... The applicant relies exclusively on the case of Rolfe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1514 for his proposition that the inadequacy of reasons can be a sufficient ground to be successful on judicial review. ...

The Applicant, her Husband, and her aunt all provided evidence that was unreliable and not credible. [8]   The IAD stated that it had considered several of the factors set out in Chavez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 CarswellNat 7250 (IAD) [Chavez], when assessing the genuineness of the marriage, the development of the relationship, and the evidence filed in support of the appeal. [9]   The IAD found that the evidence of the Applicant and her Husband was inconsistent in regard to numerous critical issues, which were contained in the forms they filed in support of the sponsorship application and, with respect to very basic elements regarding the genesis and development of their relationship. ... It was not necessary for the IAD to explicitly tie its analysis to each Chavez factor considered. [24]   The Applicant also submits that the tests for genuineness of the relationship and the intent behind the marriage pertain to different time periods – the time of the hearing and the time of the marriage – neither of which coincide with the genesis of the relationship in this case. ... The IAD also considered the Husband’s immigration history. [28]   Thus, the IAD did consider post-wedding evidence in the context of its genuineness analysis. [29]   Further, as stated in Bercasio v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 244: [19]   As I understand Yadav, it stands for the proposition that the relevant time frame for assessing the genuineness of a marriage is at the time of the interview. ...

II.   Background [5]   At the time of his complaint to the Commission, Mr. ... Analysis A.   Standard of review [25]   The Applicant provided no submissions on this issue. ... The Report details the investigator’s assessment of the Respondent’s hiring process and her consideration of the Applicant’s application in particular. [30]   The investigation does not need to be perfect; the Commission must balance the Applicant and the Respondent’s procedural fairness interests with the Commission’s interest in “maintaining a workable and administratively effective system”: Slattery, above at 600; Wong v Canada (Public Works and Government Services), 2017 FC 633 at para 40; Tahmourpour v Canada (Solicitor General), 2005 FCA 113 at para 39. ...

In 2005, the PMRA gave approval to a label expansion which allowed it to be used as a pre-harvest desiccant on a variety of crops including chickpeas. [8]   In 2009, the PMRA gave notice of its intention to re-evaluate glyphosate. ... B.   Issue II – Dietary Consumption Data [52]   The Applicants’ concern was that outdated data were used.   ... DATED: February 13, 2020   APPEARANCES: Andrea Gonsalves Emily Quail   For The Applicants   Andrea Bourke Elizabeth Koudys   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Stockwoods Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario   For The Applicants   Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent     ...

In relation to the PC Blue Menu line, introduced in 2005 and now consisting of approximately [REDACTED] different products intended to represent healthier food choices, she testified that it is typical for the PC Word Mark to appear on packaging. ... Grishkewich stated that the PC Word Mark is used frequently to promote classes and sign up customers. [75]   In 2005, Loblaw introduced PC Insurance, offering home and auto insurance, which Ms. ... Loblaw has been advertising PC Home products online since 2005 and has been selling PC kitchenware products online since 2014. ...

The RPD granted her refugee status in 2005. [4]   In 2009, Ms. Peiqrishvili applied for and obtained a Georgian passport. ... IV.   Issues [14]   The Applicant articulates the following issues for the Court’s consideration: What is the applicable standard of review? ... VIII.   Certified Questions [28]   The Applicant proposed several questions for certification for appeal, all of which are opposed by the Respondent. ...

Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1025 Date: 2019 0730 Docket: IMM-6100-18 Citation: 2019 FC 1025 Vancouver, British Colombia, July 30, 2019 PRESENT:   Madam Justice St-Louis   BETWEEN: NQOBILE BRILLIANT NDIMANDE Applicant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent JUDGMENT AND REASONS I.   ... II.   Background [3]   Ms. Ndimande is a South African citizen from Empangeni, Richards Bay. ... Ndimande’s arguments amount to disagreement with the RAD’s weighing of the evidence and should be dismissed (Moute v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 579 at para 17). ...

"Angela Furlanetto" Judge   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2118-22   STYLE OF CAUSE: PFIZER CANADA ULC AND PFIZER INC. v UNIQURE BIOPHARMA B.V.   PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: April 18, 2023   ORDER AND REASONS: FURLANETTO J.   ... Guerreiro   For The Plaintiffs   Christopher Van Barr Will Boyer Natalia Thawe   For The Defendant   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario   For The Plaintiffs   Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP Barristers and Solicitors Ottawa, Ontario   For The Defendant     ...

Subsection 3(1) of the Act sets out the eligibility criteria for receiving the CRB: Eligibility Admissibilité 3(1) A person is eligible for a Canada recovery benefit for any two-week period falling within the period beginning on September 27, 2020 and ending on October 23, 2021 if 3(1) Est admissible à la prestation canadienne de relance économique, à l’égard de toute période de deux semaines comprise dans la période commençant le 27 septembre 2020 et se terminant le 23 octobre 2021, la personne qui remplit les conditions suivantes: (a) they have a valid social insurance number; a) elle détient un numéro d’assurance sociale valide; (b) they were at least 15 years of age on the first day of the two-week period; b) elle était âgée d’au moins quinze ans le premier jour de la période de deux semaines; (c) they were resident and present in Canada during the two-week period; c) elle résidait et était présente au Canada au cours de la période de deux semaines; (d) in the case of an application made under section 4 in respect of a two-week period beginning in 2020, they had, for 2019 or in the 12-month period preceding the day on which they make the application, a total income of at least $5,000 from the following sources: d) dans le cas d’une demande présentée en vertu de l’article 4 à l’égard d’une période de deux semaines qui débute en 2020, ses revenus provenant des sources ci-après, pour l’année 2019 ou au cours des douze mois précédant la date à laquelle elle présente sa demande, s’élevaient à au moins cinq mille dollars: (i) employment, (i) un emploi, (ii) self-employment, (ii) un travail qu’elle exécute pour son compte, (iii) benefits paid to the person under any of subsections 22(1), 23(1), 152.04(1) and 152.05(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, (iii) des prestations qui lui sont payées au titre de l’un des paragraphes 22(1), 23(1), 152.04(1) et 152.05(1) de la Loi sur l’assurance-emploi, (iv) allowances, money or other benefits paid to the person under a provincial plan because of pregnancy or in respect of the care by the person of one or more of their new-born children or one or more children placed with them for the purpose of adoption, and (iv) des allocations, prestations ou autres sommes qui lui sont payées, en vertu d’un régime provincial, en cas de grossesse ou de soins à donner par elle à son ou ses nouveau-nés ou à un ou plusieurs enfants placés chez elle en vue de leur adoption, (v) any other source of income that is prescribed by regulation; (v) une autre source de revenu prévue par règlement; (e) in the case of an application made under section 4 by a person other than a person referred to in paragraph (e.1) in respect of a two-week period beginning in 2021, they had, for 2019 or for 2020 or in the 12-month period preceding the day on which they make the application, a total income of at least $5,000 from the sources referred to in subparagraphs (d)(i) to (v); e) dans le cas d’une demande présentée en vertu de l’article 4, par une personne qui n’est pas visée à l’alinéa e.1), à l’égard d’une période de deux semaines qui débute en 2021, ses revenus provenant des sources mentionnées aux sous-alinéas d)(i) à (v) pour l’année 2019 ou 2020 ou au cours des douze mois précédant la date à laquelle elle présente sa demande s’élevaient à au moins cinq mille dollars; … … B. ... (Katherine Barber, ed, The Canadian Oxford Dictionary (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2005) sub verbo “income”). [24] As Justice Stratas stated in Alexander College Corp v Canada, 2016 FCA 269 at para 11, the appropriate methodology for statutory interpretation is well-known; courts must read the words of an Act “in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament” (Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. ... Pamel” Judge Certified true translation Vincent Mar FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1291-21   STYLE OF CAUSE: LMAN KONLAMBIGUE v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   PLACE OF HEARING: MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC   DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 7, 2022   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: PAMEL J   DATED: DECEMBER 21, 2022   APPEARANCES: Lman Konlambigue FOR THE APPLICANT (on her own behalf) Alice Zhao Jiang FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT   ...