Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 331 - 340 of 883 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Did you mean?2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
FCTD
Underwood v. Canada (Attorney General), 2007 FC 71
The Applicant was advised that an affidavit which he swore on June 24, 2005 and which contained information which was not before the Minister could not be filed. b. ... Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 D.T.C. 5245 (FCA). That case involved the application of the fairness package under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5 th Supp.). ... Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 F.C.J. No. 798, 2005 FCA 166 at paragraph 5, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the pragmatic and functional analysis in Lanno also applied to fairness decisions under the Excise Act. ...
FCTD
Lépine v. Scotiabank, 2006 FC 1455
Scotiabank, 2006 FC 1455 Date: 20061130 Docket: T-2126-05 Citation: 2006 FC 1455 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] BETWEEN: JOHANNE LÉPINE Applicant and BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU [1] This is a motion by the applicant to essentially seek a ruling in his favour regarding several objections raised by the respondent, the Bank of Nova Scotia (the Bank), during examinations on affidavit of the two affiants produced by the Bank in its response on the merits to an application for judicial review filed by the applicant in December 2005. [2] That application for judicial review requires that this Court essentially examine all issues for which a complaint was filed by the applicant in September 2004 with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the Commissioner). [3] The wording of the applicant’s complaint with the Commissioner makes it hard to understand. ... “Richard Morneau” Prothonotary FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2126-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: JOHANNE LÉPINE Applicant and BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondents WRITTEN MOTION EXAMINED AT MONTRÉAL WITHOUT APPEARANCES BY THE PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER: PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU DATED: NOVEMBER 30, 2006 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS: Daniel Ovidia FOR THE APPLICANT David E. Platts FOR THE RESPONDENT BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Nathalie Daigle FOR THE RESPONDENT THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Daniel Ovidia Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT McCarthy Tétrault LLP Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA Nathalie Daigle Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA ...
FCTD
Canada (National Revenue) v. Cornfield, 2007 FC 436
BRUCE CORNFIELD Respondent and THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Intervener REASONS FOR ORDER SNIDER J ... Wirick, 2005 BCSC 1821, 51 B.C.L.R. (4th) 193, [2005] B.C.J. No. 2878 (B.C. ... Singh Lyn Ragonetti Bindal LLP, 2005 FC 1538, [2006] 1 C.T.C. 113, [2005] F.C.J. ...
FCTD
Canada v. Carapec No. 1 (Navire), 2007 FC 757
Bélanger indicates, inter alia, that on November 3, 2005, he ordered Mr. ... Gaston Langlais dated November 5, 2005, which is enclosed with my affidavit as Exhibit “D”; 15. ... “ Richard Morneau ” Prothonotary FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2033-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Plaintiff and CARAPEC NO. 1 Defendant PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: July 19, 2007 REASONS FOR ORDER: PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU DATED: July 19, 2007 APPEARANCES: Jean-Robert Noiseux FOR THE PLAINTIFF Sylvain Chouinard FOR THE DEFENDANT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. ...
FCTD
Mugu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 384
[3] In September 2005, the Applicant filed a sponsorship application for permanent residence as the conjugal partner of Mr. ... Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2005 FC 1586 at paragraph 13 and Aguebor v. ... Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] F.C.J. No. 1431 and Sharief v. ...
FCTD
Koffi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 970
It deals with the human rights situation in Côte d’Ivoire for the period between August and December 2005. ... This one deals with the human rights situation in Côte d’Ivoire, this time for the period between May and July 2005. ... DATED: JULY 23, 2019 APPEARANCES: Ange Stéphane Dakouri For the applicant Daniel Latulippe For the respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ange Stéphane Dakouri Counsel Montréal, Quebec For the applicant Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec For the respondent ...
FCTD
Insch v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2009 FC 869
By letter dated March 16, 2005, Ms. Turner noted that the Applicant’s complaint listed specific incidents between November 9, 2000 to December 5, 2001, with “vague references to additional incidents in the spring of 2002” ... [8] The Applicant filed a grievance on April 2, 2005, relative to the March 16, 2005 decision of Ms. ... [16] This means that the AC was required to consider the May 16, 2005 decision of Ms. ...
FCTD
Humby v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 FC 1238
Canada (2003), 237 F.T.R. 169, at para. 24; appeal dismissed (2004), 256 F.T.R. 8; appeal on other grounds dismissed (2005), 339 N.R. 244 (FCA) 6. ... The Queen, 2005 FCA 29; Walsh v. Canada(M.N.R.), 2006 FC 56; Henckendorn v. ... Canada, [2005] 1 R.C.S. 146 at paragraph 11, and applied by this Court in Prentice v. ...
FCTD
Avard (Re), 2009 FC 315
Rochon, namely delivery services to twelve (12) pharmacies that were added one after the other over the years (the November 8, 2003 clientele sale). [14] Between 2005 and 2007, Mr. ... YEAR AMOUNT 2005 $129,176.55 2006 $101,234.86 2007 (March 2007 to September 2007) $45,428.54 Analysis [15] Contrary to Mr. ... Rochon did not gain ownership of the clientele sold until the end of December 2007. [31] Thus, as previously mentioned, between 2005 and 2007, the payment method for the sale price enabled Mr. ...
FCTD
Torrance v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 1269
Justice Phelan BETWEEN: RODNEY TORRANCE Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT I. ... [36] In Scheuneman v Canada (Human Resources Development), 2005 FCA 254, 2005 CarswellNat 1879, the Court of Appeal, in upholding the dismissal in a tort claim for administrative error, referred at paragraph 40 to the department’s own report on administrative error: From a policy perspective, reviewing a case where Administrative Error is alleged is not a question of assigning fault, it is a question of paying a client benefits to which they are entitled. ... DATED: October 31, 2012 APPEARANCES: Mr. ...