Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

  [4]                During the month of September 2005, Mr. Beaulieu received a reassessment from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for the 2001 taxation year. ...   [6]                On July 10, 2006, Mr. Beaulieu sent to the CRA a notice of objection in accordance with subsection 165(1) of the ITA in regard to the reassessment dated September 15, 2005. ... Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FCA 271, 361 N.R. 141 at paragraph 17). ...

The T5s showed a total income of $89,325.55, of which $24,425.65 was allegedly paid in 2004 and $64,926.90 in 2005. ...   [7]                In 2008, CRA audited the Applicant’s taxes for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. ...   [9]                The Applicant has always filed her income tax returns on time and the only years in which her taxes were not paid in full were 2005 and 2006 ...

  [17]              The respondent submits today that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the collection of all or any part of the amounts set out in the assessments for the 2000 to 2005 taxation years would be jeopardized by a delay in the collection of the amounts. ...   [18]              The respondent also takes issue with the fact that reference was made to his previous charges and convictions because he served his sentence in 2005 for an offence dating back to 1995. ... Of course, the fact that the respondent was in prison in 2005 could have delayed the audit. ...

The plaintiff’s intention to reproduce the appearance of the defendants’ products, or to imitate them, is also apparent from the repeated actions taken in Canada by or on behalf of the plaintiff:  -                      On July 7, 2005, the defendant, Compagnie Gervais Danone S.A., filed an application in Canada to register the L. ... Ritvik Holdings Inc. [2005] 3 S.C.R. 302 (Ritvik) and Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. ... ET AL.       PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montréal, Quebec   DATE OF HEARING:                       June 30, 2008   REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER:                                    PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU   DATED:                                              July 3, 2008       APPEARANCES:   François Guay   FOR THE APPLICANT/ DEFENDANT TO THE COUNTERCLAIM   Barry Gamache   FOR THE DEFENDANTS/PLAINTIFFS BY COUNTERCLAIM   SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   Smart & Biggar Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT/ DEFENDANT TO THE COUNTERCLAIM   Léger Robic Richard Montréal, Quebec   FOR THE DEFENDANTS/PLAINTIFFS BY COUNTERCLAIM         ...

  [3]                The respondent claims the following fees: item 2 – defence preparation (7 units), item 7 – disclosure – affidavit of documents (5 units), item 8 – examination preparations (5 units), item 9 – attendance at the examination, for each hour (2:15 hours, February 1, 2005) (3 units), item 10 – preparation for the pre-trial conference, including the factum (6 units), item 11 – attendance at the examination, for each hour (40 minutes, May 18, 2005) (3 units), item 12 – notices to admit (3 units), item 13 a) – hearing preparation (5 units), item 13 b) – hearing preparation, for each day in Court after the first day (1 day) (3 units), item 14 a) counsel fees, hearing on December 12, 2005 (5:11) and on December 3, 2005 (6:45) (3 units), item 15 – preparation and filing of a written argument requested by the Court (7 units), item 25 – services rendered after the judgment not otherwise specified (1 unit), and item 26 – assessment of fees (6 units) ...       [5]                All disbursements claimed in the amount of $1,817.83 are allowed for the photocopying fees, bailiff fees, and court reporter fees on February 1, 2005, since they seem reasonable to me, are not contested, and the evidence was done by affidavit ... Kirvan Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec   FOR THE RESPONDENT         ...

  [3]                On October 28, 2005, the applicant filed his Portfolio of Competencies with the names of three references, naming Roger Doucet as a validator. ...     [5]                Faced with this refusal to confirm, Mr. Lamy wrote in his report dated November 14, 2005, that the TAC competency was [translation] “not demonstrated”. ... Boucher, 2005 FCA 77; Sketchley v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 FCA 404, paragraphs 90 and 91. ...

    [61]            In a meeting with Mr. Taylor in early September 2005, Mr.  ... Okay.   A.        So Mr. Hennessey would end up paying.   [Also see page 235, Volume 5 of the trial transcript]     [65]            On October 21, 2005, Mr.  ... You say that you only have records for 2004 and 2005.  Can you explain why you only have records for 2004 and 2005?   ...

He cancelled accruing penalties and interest from February 17, 2004 to March 30, 2005, the date of his decision. ... It was, as noted, conducted by the Burnaby-Fraser TSO in Surrey, British Columbia. [32]       The Minister's delegate who made the March 30, 2005 decision was Raminder Pooni, at the time, the acting Chief of Appeals at the TSO. ... Yunker's March 15, 2005 document (see pages 60 to 64, R. R., volume 1). ...

  [3]   On January 6, 2005, Telefilm Canada served in Superior Court a motion for declinatory exception on the grounds that that Court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the lawfulness of the call for proposals ...   [4]   On January 14, 2005, FFM filed in Federal Court a notice of application for judicial review against the decisions of Telefilm Canada dated September 7, 2004, and December 17, 2004 ... As it is possible that the outcome of the first decision could influence the outcome of the second, it would be best to let the entire debate follow its course. [16]            Thus, in accordance with the final approach adopted by the Federal Court of Appeal on October 27, 2005, in The Queen v. ...

Zen, 2009 FC 531                   20090526   Docket:  T-1360-06   Citation:  2009 FC 531   Ottawa, Ontario, May 26, 2009   PRESENT:  The Honourable Mr. Justice Blanchard     BETWEEN:   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Applicant   and   GIOVANNI ZEN   Respondent     T-1024-08   AND BETWEEN:   GIOVANNI ZEN   Applicant   and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Respondent       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT     I.          ...     [9]                On August 23, 2005, the Minister served Mr. Zen with five (5) RFIs pursuant to subsection 231.2(1)(a) of the Act (2005 RFIs) seeking his Net Worth Statements as at August 15, 2005, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, complete with supporting schedules, showing full details of all his assets and liabilities ...