Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Justice Zinn     BETWEEN:     THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE       Applicant   and       JOSEPH R. ...   [11]            This definition is in keeping with the law of solicitor-client privilege which has held that the protection applies to communications involving the seeking and providing of legal advice and does not apply to documents that are “evidence of an act or transaction rather than a communication:” Canada (Minister of National Revenue – MNR) v Singh Lyn Ragonetti Bindal LLP, 2005 FC 1538, para 18 ...   [12]            This Court has ordered the production of information and documents relating to financial transactions directed through a solicitor’s trust account, such as cheques, statements of adjustment, and account ledgers, on numerous occasions:  See for example: Canada (Minister of National Revenue – MNR) v Reddy, 2006 FC 277; Canada (Minister of National Revenue – MNR) v Singh Lyn Ragonetti Bindal LLP, 2005 FC 1538; Canada (Minister of National Revenue – MNR) v Cornfield, 2007 FC 436; Canada (Minister of National Revenue – MNR) v Currie, 2008 FC 237 ...

It is not available as of right (see Lanno v Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FCA 153, [2005] FCJ No 714 at paragraph 6).   ...   [15]            As of October 3, 2005, the applicants had not filed tax returns in Canada ...   [26]            On November 30, 2005, DioGuardi informed the CRA that the principal applicant was the individual behind the no-name disclosure made on October 5, 2005. ...

Canada, [2005] F.C.J. No. 1952, 2005 FCA 393; Sokolowska v. The Queen, [2005] F.C.J. ... Canada, [2005] F.C.J. No. 1006, 2005 FC 802; Angell v. Canada (M.N.R.), [2005] F.C.J. ... Canada, [2005] T.C.J. No. 614, 2005 TCC 761; Hardtke v. Canada, [2005] T.C.J. ...

  [1]                            On May 20, 2005, on his return to Canada from Venezuela, the applicant failed to declare the importation of currency equivalent to US$17,271.00, thereby contravening section 12 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, S.C. 2000, c. 17 (hereinafter the Act) ... Minister of National Revenue, 2005 FC 1437, [2005] F.C.J. No. 1783 (QL), Tourki v. ... You mentioned in your letter of June 27, 2005 that you reported $27,000 in currency when you entered Mexico; however, you failed to report the currency to the Canada Border Services Agency at the time of export from Canada and you then tried to prevent the detection of currency on your return to Canada by asking your companion to carry part of it.   ...

A complete list of money, shares, securities, interest, dividends and any other asset held directly, indirectly or beneficially for Cory Stanchfield for the period January 1 st 2005 to April 1 st 2007   d. A complete list of all nominees, including complete names and addresses, who operated trading and/or investment accounts on behalf of Cory Stanchfield for the period January 1 st 2005 to April 1 st 2007   e. ... It reads as follows: a)       There are no bank accounts, credit union accounts or similar financial institution accounts that Cory Stanchfield has signing authority over, including accounts held in countries other than Canada for the period January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2007   b)       There are no trading accounts, investment portfolio, or any other accounts pertaining to the sale of stock, securities, bonds and commodities held directly, indirectly or beneficially for Cory Stanchfield, and therefore there are not list(s) or listing of transactions for the period January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2007   c)       There is no money shares, securities, interest, dividends, or any other asset held directly, indirectly or beneficially for Cory Stanchfield, and therefore there are no list(s) for the period January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2007   d)       There is no nominees who operated trading and/or investment accounts on behalf of Cory Stanchfield and therefore there are no list(s) for the period January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2007   e)       There are no names and address of companies, including companies in countries other than Canada that Cory Stanchfield was a director, shareholder, officer, agent, or nominee and therefore there are no list(s) for the period January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2007 ...

PROHIBIT the Minister of Environment Canada from making any decision that his failure to act is due to the fact that he was not put in possession of the document entitled Rapport d’intervention détaillé du service de sécurité incendie de Salaberry-de-Valleyfield until April 1, 2005, since such a premise is vitiated by fraud under paragraph 18.1(3)(b) of the Federal Courts Act;   2.       ORDER the Minister of Environment Canada, under section 39 of the CEPA, to disclose to the Court why he concealed the Rapport d’intervention détaillé du service de sécurité incendie de Salaberry-de-Valleyfield completed by the Valleyfield fire department on August 10, 2005;   3.       ... Monty, [2005] J.Q. No. 8289   [33]            For these reaons, it is therefore clear to me that the second part of the third remedy, as well as the fourth and fifth remedies sought by the applicant, are unfounded in law and certain to fail ...

Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146, 2005 SCC 11 at paragraphs 1-2; Okwuobi v. ... Pearson School Board, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 257, 2005 SCC 16 at paragraphs 38-55; Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667, 2005 SCC 30 at paragraph 96. [31]      Administrative law judgments and textbooks describe this rule in many ways: the doctrine of exhaustion, the doctrine of adequate alternative remedies, the doctrine against fragmentation or bifurcation of administrative proceedings, the rule against interlocutory judicial reviews and the objection against premature judicial reviews. ...

On May 12, 2005, pursuant to a written motion by the applicant, Prothonotary Morneau made an order that a single record be filed by the applicant in each application.  ... It appears from the affidavit dated March 10, 2005, of Michael McGlynn, director of the Technical Publications Unit of the CRA’s Excise and GST/HST Rulings Directorate (Excise Directorate – CRA), that the applications were denied on July 23, 2002 ... THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montréal, Quebec   DATE OF HEARING:                       December 13, 2005   REASONS FOR ORDER BY:         The Honourable Mr. ...

  [6]                Twelve years later, by letter dated June 27, 2005, the applicant renewed his request for a refund of the premiums, with interest, paid for 1988, 1989 and 1990 under the Fairness provision of the Income Tax Act.  The applicant was advised on July 22, 2005, that his request was denied on the grounds that the Employment Insurance Act limits refunds to three years from the date on which a request is made ...   [7]                On September 16, 2005, the applicant sought a second level Fairness review, claiming damages for un-refunded insurance premiums, as well as for taxes and interest collected by the Canada Revenue Agency, with interest, for his 1988, 1989 and 1990 taxation years ...

Because the Yukon Government did not mount a substantive defence to the Minister’s case against it, the contraventions were confirmed by the Tribunal in a decision rendered on April 6, 2005. ... Toronto Transit Commission (2005), 74 O.R. (3 rd) 278, [2005] O.J. No. 224 (C.A ...       “ R. L. Barnes ” Judge   FEDERAL COURT                         NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                        T-1708-05     STYLE OF CAUSE:                        Attorney General of Canada v. ...