Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 471 - 480 of 661 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Did you mean?2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
FCA
Jentel Manufacturing Ltd. v. Canada, 2012 DTC 5031 [at at 6682], 2011 FCA 355
Canada, 2012 DTC 5031 [at at 6682], 2011 FCA 355 Federal Court of Appeal Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20111215 Docket: A-222-11 Citation: 2011 FCA 355 CORAM: EVANS J.A. ... (Jentel), is entitled to scientific research and experimental development tax credits (SRED credits) under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), as amended (the Act) in relation to its 2005 fiscal year. ... During its 2005 fiscal year, Jentel set out to overhaul its Multi-Bins concept. ...
FCA
Canada v. Stantec Inc., 2009 FCA 285
LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and STANTEC INC. ... [3] In 2005, Stantec incurred costs in Canada to obtain a listing of its shares on the New York Stock Exchange. ... [18] The appeal will be dismissed with costs. J.A. ...
FCA
Coast Capital Savings Credit Union v. Canada, 2016 FCA 181
The Queen, 2005 TCC 806, [2006] 2 C.T.C. 2045. While Coast Capital acknowledges that the Nunn decision was reversed on appeal (2006 FCA 403, 367 N.R. 108 [Nunn FCA]), it says that this Court did not do so on the basis that only the Minister can rely on the sham doctrine. ... HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: April 19, 2016 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: GLEASON J.A. ... RENNIE J.A. DATED: June 15, 2016 APPEARANCES: Robert Kopstein Alexandra Brown For The Appellant Perry Derksen For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Barristers and Solicitors Vancouver, British Columbia For The Appellant William F. ...
FCA
Canada v. Csak, 2025 FCA 60
Canada, 2005 SCC 54 at para. 10 and Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 SCC 20 at para. 22). ... MARIA CSAK PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: January 21, 2025 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: BIRINGER J.A. ... PAMEL J.A. DATED: MARCH 14, 2025 APPEARANCES: Meaghan Mahadeo Grace Jothiraj For The Appellant John Buote For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Shalene Curtis-Micallef Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Appellant BRS Tax Lawyers LLP Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent ...
FCA
Sher-E Punjab Radio Broadcasting Inc. v. Canada, 2020 FCA 206
LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: SHER-E PUNJAB RADIO BROADCASTING INC. Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard by online video conference hosted by the registry on October 6, 2020. ... I. Background [3] Sher-E-Punjab Radio failed to file its corporate tax returns for its 2005 to 2012 taxation years. ... He was the officer and director of Sher-E-Punjab Radio who would have been responsible for filing its corporate tax returns for its taxation years from 2005 to 2012. ...
FCA
Canada (National Revenue) v. Cameco Corporation, 2019 FCA 67
LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE Appellant and CAMECO CORPORATION Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 28, 2018. ... R., 2005 SCC 54 at para. 44, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601). The standard of review applicable to the applications judge’s interpretation of paragraph 231.1(1)(a) is therefore correctness: Housen v. ... Canada (Customs & Revenue Agency), 2005 FCA 218 at para. 11 (Saipem), leave to appeal refused, 349 N.R. 200 (S.C.C.). ...
FCA
CIBC World Markets Inc. v. Canada, 2019 FCA 147
On occasion, words that, at first glance, seem clear, can admit of ambiguity after broader examination: Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc., 2005 SCC 62 (CanLII), [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141 at para. 10; [I have omitted the reference to Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. v. Canada, 2005 SCC 54, at para. 47 as the paragraph cited addresses the distinct and particularized application of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule under section 245 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c.1 (5 th Supp.).] [28] Adopting this approach, an ambiguity does arise from a broader examination of the ETA as to how subsections 132(3) and 150(1) interact. ... HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: March 21, 2019 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NOËL C.J. ...
FCA
President's Choice Bank v. Canada (the King), 2024 FCA 135
GOYETTE J.A. BETWEEN: PRESIDENT ’ S CHOICE BANK Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 6, 2024. ... GOYETTE J.A. BETWEEN: PRESIDENT’S CHOICE BANK Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT GOYETTE J.A. ... Canada, 2005 SCC 54, at para. 10). The interpretation issue is focused on the following phrase in subsection 181(5) of the ETA: … a particular person at any time pays, in the course of a commercial activity of the particular person, an amount to the supplier for the redemption of the coupon … [92] This text, which focuses on the payment of an amount in the course of a commercial activity, is unique to subsection 181(5) of the ETA. ...
FCA
Canada v. Spruce Credit Union, 2014 DTC 5079 [at at 7044], 2014 FCA 143
(the ITA) with regard to a dividend (Dividend B) that it had received from a deposit insurance corporation during its 2005 taxation year. ... However, from 1989 until 2005, CUDIC and STAB jointly levied and maintained this fund, with the FI Commission’s knowledge and consent. ... Canada, 2005 SCC 54, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601 at paragraph 10 [Canada Trustco]). ...