Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Results 5111 - 5120 of 5349 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC

Adboss, Ltd. v. The King, 2022 TCC 125, aff'd 2023 FCA 201

“Dominique Lafleur” Lafleur J.       Citation: 2022 TCC 125 Date: 20221101 Docket: 2021-586(GST)G BETWEEN: ADBOSS, LTD., Appellant, and HIS MAJESTY THE KING, Respondent. ... The Queen, 2005 TCC 556 at para 23). [35] Furthermore, according to the Respondent, there is no prejudice to the Appellant in having subparagraph 13.dd) in the Reply. ... Cheung COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the: Name: Mark Tonkovich Alexe Corbeil-Courchesne Firm: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Toronto, Ontario For the Respondent: François Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada   ...
TCC

Liberty Street Management Inc. v. The King, 2022 TCC 127

“Dominique Lafleur” Lafleur J.       Citation: 2022 TCC 127 Date: 20221101 Docket: 2021-588(GST)G BETWEEN: LIBERTY STREET MANAGEMENT INC., Appellant, and HIS MAJESTY THE KING, Respondent. ... The Queen, 2005 TCC 556 at para 23). [35] Furthermore, according to the Respondent, there is no prejudice to the Appellant in having subparagraphs 12.w) and x) in the Reply. ... Cheung COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the: Name: Mark Tonkovich Alexe Corbeil-Courchesne Firm: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Toronto, Ontario For the Respondent: François Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada   ...
TCC

Bluecove Management Ltd. v. The King, 2022 TCC 126

“Dominique Lafleur” Lafleur J.     Citation: 2022 TCC 126 Date: 20221101 Docket: 2021-587(GST)G BETWEEN: BLUECOVE MANAGEMENT LTD., Appellant, and HIS MAJESTY THE KING, Respondent. ... The Queen, 2005 TCC 556 at para 23). [35] Furthermore, according to the Respondent, there is no prejudice to the Appellant in having subparagraph 12.u) in the Reply. ... Cheung COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the: Name: Mark Tonkovich Alexe Corbeil-Courchesne Firm: Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Toronto, Ontario For the Respondent: François Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada   ...
FCTD

Konlambigue v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1781

Subsection 3(1) of the Act sets out the eligibility criteria for receiving the CRB: Eligibility Admissibilité 3(1) A person is eligible for a Canada recovery benefit for any two-week period falling within the period beginning on September 27, 2020 and ending on October 23, 2021 if 3(1) Est admissible à la prestation canadienne de relance économique, à l’égard de toute période de deux semaines comprise dans la période commençant le 27 septembre 2020 et se terminant le 23 octobre 2021, la personne qui remplit les conditions suivantes: (a) they have a valid social insurance number; a) elle détient un numéro d’assurance sociale valide; (b) they were at least 15 years of age on the first day of the two-week period; b) elle était âgée d’au moins quinze ans le premier jour de la période de deux semaines; (c) they were resident and present in Canada during the two-week period; c) elle résidait et était présente au Canada au cours de la période de deux semaines; (d) in the case of an application made under section 4 in respect of a two-week period beginning in 2020, they had, for 2019 or in the 12-month period preceding the day on which they make the application, a total income of at least $5,000 from the following sources: d) dans le cas d’une demande présentée en vertu de l’article 4 à l’égard d’une période de deux semaines qui débute en 2020, ses revenus provenant des sources ci-après, pour l’année 2019 ou au cours des douze mois précédant la date à laquelle elle présente sa demande, s’élevaient à au moins cinq mille dollars: (i) employment, (i) un emploi, (ii) self-employment, (ii) un travail qu’elle exécute pour son compte, (iii) benefits paid to the person under any of subsections 22(1), 23(1), 152.04(1) and 152.05(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, (iii) des prestations qui lui sont payées au titre de l’un des paragraphes 22(1), 23(1), 152.04(1) et 152.05(1) de la Loi sur l’assurance-emploi, (iv) allowances, money or other benefits paid to the person under a provincial plan because of pregnancy or in respect of the care by the person of one or more of their new-born children or one or more children placed with them for the purpose of adoption, and (iv) des allocations, prestations ou autres sommes qui lui sont payées, en vertu d’un régime provincial, en cas de grossesse ou de soins à donner par elle à son ou ses nouveau-nés ou à un ou plusieurs enfants placés chez elle en vue de leur adoption, (v) any other source of income that is prescribed by regulation; (v) une autre source de revenu prévue par règlement; (e) in the case of an application made under section 4 by a person other than a person referred to in paragraph (e.1) in respect of a two-week period beginning in 2021, they had, for 2019 or for 2020 or in the 12-month period preceding the day on which they make the application, a total income of at least $5,000 from the sources referred to in subparagraphs (d)(i) to (v); e) dans le cas d’une demande présentée en vertu de l’article 4, par une personne qui n’est pas visée à l’alinéa e.1), à l’égard d’une période de deux semaines qui débute en 2021, ses revenus provenant des sources mentionnées aux sous-alinéas d)(i) à (v) pour l’année 2019 ou 2020 ou au cours des douze mois précédant la date à laquelle elle présente sa demande s’élevaient à au moins cinq mille dollars; B. ... (Katherine Barber, ed, The Canadian Oxford Dictionary (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2005) sub verbo “income”). [24] As Justice Stratas stated in Alexander College Corp v Canada, 2016 FCA 269 at para 11, the appropriate methodology for statutory interpretation is well-known; courts must read the words of an Act “in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament” (Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. ... Pamel” Judge Certified true translation Vincent Mar FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1291-21   STYLE OF CAUSE: LMAN KONLAMBIGUE v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   PLACE OF HEARING: MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC   DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 7, 2022   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: PAMEL J   DATED: DECEMBER 21, 2022   APPEARANCES: Lman Konlambigue FOR THE APPLICANT (on her own behalf) Alice Zhao Jiang FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT   ...
TCC

McLarty v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 141

The Queen, 2010 TCC 141     Docket: 97-3628(IT)G BETWEEN: ALLAN MCLARTY, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.   ... Signed at Toronto, Ontario, this 8th day of March 2010.       “B.G. Tanasychuk” Taxing Officer   Citation: 2010 TCC 141 Date: 20100308 Docket: 97-3628(IT)G BETWEEN: ALLAN MCLARTY, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,   Respondent.   ... Little dated January 26, 2005, wherein appeals from assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the 1992 and 1994 taxation years were allowed, with costs. ...
FCTD

Canada (National Revenue) v. 2276230 Ontario Inc., 2021 FC 242

Rather, the provision states that a compliance order may be granted if the Court “is satisfied that (a) the person was required under section 288 or 289 to provide the… information or document and did not do so …” (emphasis added). The French version confirms this interpretation: “s’il est convaincu de ce qui suit: (a) la personne n’a pas fourni […] les renseignements ou les documents bien qu’elle en soit tenue par les articles 288 ou 289 […]” (emphasis added). [19] Second, although the Respondents have provided some of the information requested, they do not dispute that several of the requested elements remain outstanding. ... Pentney” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD   Dockets: T-389-21, T-392-21 AND T-393-21   DOCKET: T-389-21 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v 2276230 ONTARIO INC. ...
TCC

Chiasson v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 95 (Informal Procedure)

(Barbados) March 21, 2001 $    191,999.99 Bank transfer to Omnicorp $    191,514.75 June 5, 2001 $ 1,000,000.00 Cheque 0067 to Brodie Morris Barrister Solicitor $ 1,000,000.00 June 27, 2001 $    137,500.00 Yorkton Securities $    137,500.00 July 4, 2001 $    137,500.00 Yorkton Securities Account 5A 3519A $    137,500.00 July 16, 2001 $    500,000.00 Cheque 0096 to Brodie Morris $    500,000.00 Sept. 27, 2001 $    500,000.00 Bank draft to Brodie Morris $    500,000.00 October 3, 2001 $    200,000.00 Yorkton Securities, Special Warrants KT 5A3527-A   200,000.00 October 3, 2001 $    300,000.00 Charismatic Industries Inc. $    300,000.00 November 26, 2001 $    375,042.00 Funds transferred to “Landmark Capital” $    375,000.00 December 14, 2001 $    300,000.00 Gary Moore, Lawyer, In trust “SITSA” Agreement $    300,000.00 Totals $3,642,041.99   $3,641,514.75       Agreed to balance sheet [19]         In 2001 and 2002, Landmark did not have a payroll account with CRA and did not claim an expense for salaries or wages. ... The application for the licence provides the following information:         the business the company proposes to carry on: “to engage in equity investments in venture capital opportunities in the energy industry”. [23]         The documentation, dated August 9, 2001, provided to the Royal Bank of Canada for the purpose of setting up a bank account in Barbados for Landmark Barbados indicates the following:         the shareholders of the Company are Landmark Capital Partners Ltd., Rob Keenan & Bill Adams (51%) and Swiss Imperial Trust & Nelson Bayford (49%);         the nature of business: venture capital energy firm. [24]         The affidavits provided by Robert Keenan, William Adams and Nelson Bayford to the Royal Bank of Canada to open the bank account for Landmark Barbados indicates that:         Robert Keenan and William Adams were directors of the company; and         Nelson Bayford was not a director of the company. [25]         The company’s list of officers and directors, addressed to the Royal Bank of Canada, indicates that Nelson Bayford, William Adams and Robert Keenan were directors and officers of the company. [26]         The corporate tax returns submitted for Landmark Barbados on February 4, 2005 for the years ending December 31, 2001 and 2002, reported that the company was a resident of Barbados and that there was no income nor claim for expenses in either year. [27]         The balance sheet of Landmark Barbados for the period ending December 31, 2001 reported $360,000 in cash, $15,000 in incorporation costs and $375,000 in share capital. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada     ...
FCTD

Gloglo v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 1923

The fact that the Agreement states that Canada and Ireland have “[r]esolved to co-operate in the field of social security,” or the fact that deductions for Pay Related Social Insurance the Irish equivalent of EI contributions were withheld from source for the duration of Mr. ... In the same vein, subsection 64(3) of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act, SC 2005, c 34 [DESDA] provides that questions of employment insurability arising in an application or appeal before the SST must be resolved by an authorized CRA officer. [31] Insurability rulings made by authorized CRA officers may be appealed to the MNR, and subsequently to the TCC (sections 91 and 103(1) of the EIA). [32] Parties dissatisfied with their request for reconsideration of a Commission decision may appeal the reconsideration decision to the General Division (section 113 of the EIA and paragraph 52(1)(a) of the DESDA). ... DATED: NOVEMBER 29, 2024 APPEARANCES: Midjohodo Franck Gloglo For The Applicant (ON HIS OWN BEHALF) Sandra Doucette For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD:     Attorney General of Canada Gatineau (Québec) For The Respondent   ...
TCC

University of New Brunswick v. M.N.R., 2023 TCC 72

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 25 th day of May, 2023.   “R.S. Bocock” Bocock J. ... HMQ, 2012 TCC 212 (“ Caropreso ”). At paragraph 20 in that appeal, specifically involving PDFs, Justice Woods states: The root of the difficulty is that payments to postdoctoral research fellows often have dual elements. ... MNR, 2005 TCC 443 (“Bekhor”); or, b) in the nature of income for work and services provided to the educational institution, as was determined in Chabaud v. ...
FCTD

Rashidian v. Canada (Attorney general), 2024 FC 327

The following four exhibits are the subject of the respondent’s dispute: DOC-01: Document entitled “PFCO 2019-2021- Courtier immobilier résidentiel et commercial au sein d’une agence /Residential and commercial real estate broker acting agency 1 mai 2019 au 30 avril 2021”. ... Ngo” Judge Certified true translation Sebastian Desbarats   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD   DOCKET: T-1473-22 STYLE OF CAUSE: MOHAMMAD REZA RASHIDIAN v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: MONTREAL, QUEBEC DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 10, 2024 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: NGO J. DATED: FEBRUARY 28, 2024 APPEARANCES: Mohammad Reza Rashidian FOR THE APPLICANT Yasaman Targhibi FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Montreal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT   ...

Pages