Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 531 - 540 of 844 for 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
FCTD
Syncrude Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 776
As the Chief Justice stated in Ward v Canada (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 17, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 569 [Ward] at para 19: “The question is not whether the Regulations prohibit the sale so much as why it is prohibited.” ... The Court may consider both its legal effect and its practical effect: Kitkatla Band v British Columbia (Minister of Small Business, Tourism and Culture), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 146 at para 54. [41] Syncrude submits that, at best, the effect of the law from an environmental perspective was unknown at the time the RFR was introduced. ... DATED: August 6, 2014 APPEARANCES: Bernard J. Roth and Joshua A. Jantzi For The Applicant Kerry E.S. ...
FCTD
Waycobah First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 FC 1188
[5] Rod’s One Stop was selected for audit in October 2002 with respect to the period from April 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001. ... [8] In September 2003, the Applicant was audited with respect to its operation of Rod’s One Stop for the period January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002. ... [40] The Assistant Commissioner noted that the Applicant’s history of non-compliance existed despite the continual communications with CRA officials on the issue of its HST obligations dating back to January 2002. ...
FCTD
M.S. v Canada, 2020 FC 982
Yet, no Canadian court has ever accepted such a proposition. [88] In Gosselin v Quebec (Attorney General), 2002 CSC 84, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429 [Gosselin], the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that some components of the Quebec social assistance regime did not breach section 7 of the Canadian Charter. ... [blank] Saskatchewan Income Tax Act, 2000, SS 2000 c I-2.01 38 3(14)(g), 97, 98 Yukon Income Tax Act, RSY 2002, c 118 9 1(7), 34, 35 FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1914-19 STYLE OF CAUSE: M.S. v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: held by VIDEOCONFERENCE BETWEEN OTTAWA, ONTARIO, AND Montreal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: September 15, 2020 ORDER AND REASONS: GRAMMOND J. DATED: OCTOBEr 21, 2020 APPEARANCES: David Assor Joanie Lévesque For the applicant Ian Demers Vlad Zolia For the defendant SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Lex Group Attorneys Montreal, Quebec For the applicant Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the defendant ...
FCTD
Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 DTC 5113 [at 7275], 2014 FC 839
In addition, prior to 2003, Imperial Oil had even applied for judicial review in respect of the interest issue in 2002 in Imperial Oil, and this, on the basis of a Notice of Reassessment. ... DATED: SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 APPEARANCES: Al Meghji Peter Macdonald For The ApplicantS William Softley Rosemary Fincham For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Barristers and Solicitors Ottawa, Ontario For The ApplicantS William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Calgary, Alberta For The Respondent ...
FCTD
Cozak v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1351
As I informed the Attorney General of Canada at the hearing, I therefore intend to issue my decision on the basis of the parties’ written submissions (Nault v Canada (Public Service Commission), 2002 FCT 1297 at para 2). ... Conclusion [30] The application for judicial review will be dismissed. ... Pamel” Judge Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-569-21 STYLE OF CAUSE: DANIEL COZAK v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: HEARD VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE DATE OF HEARING: SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: PAMEL J. ...
FCTD
Armstrong v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2004 FC 1353
On April 9, 2002, the Applicant filed an objection with the CCRA in relation to his 1993 taxation year, the objection relating to the amended return filed by him on December 30, 1997; 8. On December 21, 2002, the Applicant once again appealed to the Tax Court in respect of his 1993 taxation year, seeking to have the amended return filed by him on December 30, 1997 taken into account. ... DATED: October 1, 2004 APPEARANCES: Mr. Douglas Marion FOR APPLICANT Mr. ...
FCTD
Ugro v. Canada (National Revenue), 2009 FC 826
[9] In 2002, the Applicant re-filed his 2000 income statement himself using CRA’s T2124. ... The Applicant met with the Appeals Officer on two occasions to discuss his request but it was denied on July 23, 2002. ... Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2002 SCC 1. The standard of review for errors of law is correctness. ...
FCTD
Rémillard v. Canada (National Revenue), 2021 FC 644
In particular, regarding the test in Sierra Club of Canada v Canada (Minister of Finance), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522 [Sierra Club], his counsel emphasized tax secrecy as the important public interest to be protected, rather than privacy. ... Pamel” Judge Certified true translation Michael Palles, Reviser FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1244-19 STYLE OF CAUSE: LUCIEN RÉMILLARD v MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE PLACE OF HEARING: MATTER HEARD BY VIDEOCONFERENCE DATE OF HEARING: jUNE 8 AND 17, 2021 PUBLIC ORDER AND REASONS: PAMEL J. DATED: JUNE 21, 2021 APPEARANCES: Élisabeth Robichaud Léon Moubayed FOR THE APPLICANT Louis Sébastien Jonathan Bachir-Legault FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Davis Ward Phillips & Vineberg, LLP Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT ...
FCTD
Sweet v. Canada, 2022 FC 1228
The plaintiff must also show proximity — that the defendant was in a close and direct relationship to him or her such that it is just to impose a duty of care in the circumstances. ... Div.)), at para. 10; Eizenga et al., at § 3.31). Dutton states that “[i]t is necessary... that any particular person’s claim to membership in the class be determinable by stated, objective criteria” (para. 38). ... As the Defendant submits, punitive damages are awarded only in exceptional circumstances for high-handed, malicious, arbitrary or highly reprehensible misconduct that departs to a marked degree from ordinary standards of decent behaviour (see Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co, 2002 SCC 18 at para 94). [180] The Plaintiff has provided little in the way of submissions in support of this proposed question. ...
FCTD
Nexen Marketing, Re v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2005 FC 1019
In the particular circumstances, this failure convinces me that no extension should be granted._ 25_ The motion is dismissed. "Johanne Gauthier" Judge FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: 05-T-47 STYLE OF CAUSE: NEXEN INC. and WASCANA ENERGY 2001 LTD., carrying in partnership as Nexen Marketing (hereinafter "Nexen Marketing") and NEXEN INC. ... Sims, Q.C. FOR RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario [1] The Request for redetermination did not cover the portion of the decisions which dealt with a three months period ending September 30, 2002. [2] Tenaska Marketing Canada would also have filed a similar application. ...