Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

The lease apparently signed with his brother (the judgment debtor) on August 11, 2001, was also filed as Exhibit O-4. [7] The seizing creditor examined the opposing party on this first affidavit on October 18, 2002. [8] In spite of this situation and with the consent of the seizing creditor and of this Court, as a complement to the motion record filed on March 17, 2003, the opposing party filed an affidavit dated March 10, 2003, to which was annexed a series of exhibits, O-5 to O-17. [9] By this affidavit dated March 10, 2003, the opposing party tried to explain in a manner that is sometimes laborious to follow that he acted as a real owner would have acted in connection with the building. [10] However, some of the affirmations in this affidavit either contradict what the opposing party stated in his examination on affidavit in October 2002 or are not really or clearly supported by the exhibits to which the opposing party refers us. [11] For example, at his examination in October 2002, the opposing party stated that, when the building was purchased in March 2001, there was no lessee present in the building. ... [translation] “ 507 – Evidence of a counter-letter – A distinction must be made on the basis of whether it is the parties or third parties who seek to adduce this evidence. ... An order will be issued accordingly.     “Richard Morneau” Prothnotary   Montréal, Quebec May 24, 2006   Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:   IT A-872-01   STYLE OF CAUSE:   INCOME TAX against: GUY GAUTHIER and MARCEL GAUTHIER       PLACE OF HEARING:   Montréal, Quebec   DATE OF HEARING:   May 15, 2006   REASONS FOR ORDER BY:   PROTHNOTARY MORNEAU   DATED:   May 24, 2006       APPEARANCES:   Claude Bernard   FOR THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR     Robert Jodoin   FOR THE OPPOSING PARTY   SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   Claude Bernard Department of Justice FOR THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR     Jodoin Huppé Granby, Quebec FOR THE OPPOSING PARTY         ...

Mac, 2002 SCC 24, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 856, at para. 5). The shared meaning is generally preferred unless other indicators of legislative intent suggest that the shared meaning is inappropriate (Doré v. ... One legal dictionary defines “identification” as the “ action de reconnaître quelqu’un ou quelque chose,” and “ vérification ” as the “opération par laquelle une personne examine une chose en vue d’en contrôler l’exactitude ou la véracité” (Hubert Reid & Simon Reid, eds, Dictionnaire de droit québécois et canadien, 6 th ed (Chambly: Wilson & Lafleur, 2023) sub verbo “identification,” “vérification”). ... The “named persons requirement” regime is rather permissive, enabling the Minister to require “ any information” or “ any document” from “ any person” for “ any purpose related to the administration or enforcement of this Act [or] a listed international agreement” (emphasis added). ...

., 2010 FC 596 Date: 20100601 Docket: T-2087-09 Citation: 2010 FC 596   [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Ottawa, Ontario, June 1, 2010 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Johanne Gauthier   BETWEEN: ROBERT GRAVEL   Applicant and   TELUS COMMUNICATIONS INC.   ... Canada (Industrial Relations Board), 2002 FCA 295, 292 N.R. 187 at paragraph 5; Atlantic Engraving Ltd. v. ... Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2002 FCA 149, 113 A.C.W.S. (3d) 927, at para 2. [3] Armstrong, at para 40. ...

., Re, 2003 FC 1105                                                                                                                                   Date: 20030925                                                                                                                              Docket: T-1417-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1105 In the matter of the Income Tax Act and In the matter of an assessment or assessments determined by the Minister of National Revenue under one or more of the following statutes: the Income Tax Act, the Canada Pension Plan and the Employment Insurance Act AGAINST: FABRICATION GMCA INC. 291 rue du Carmel Danville, Quebec J0A 1A0 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS- REASONS SUZANNE DAVID, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1]         On August 29, 2002, an ex parte motion for authorization to proceed forthwith was filed by the Minister of National Revenue under subsection 225.2(2) of the Income Tax Act. ... On the following October 4, Fabrication GMCA Inc. filed a motion for review of the Court's order, and this motion was dismissed by the Court on December 6, 2002, with costs. [2]         Mr. ... Absent any written representations within the times specified by the Registry, we will proceed with the assessment of that bill. [3]         The fees claimed are as follows: Item Services Units/ Column III Amount 5 Preparation and filing of a reply to the motion for review of an order 5 $550.00 6 Appearance on a motion, for each hour- December 3, 2002 2 X 3 hrs $660.00 8 Preparation for an examination 2 $220.00 9 Attending on examinations, for each hour 1 X 4 hrs $440.00 13 Counsel fees: (a) preparation for hearing 4 $440.00 25 Services after judgment not otherwise specified 1 $110.00 26 Assessment of costs 4 $440.00 [4]         The assessable services under items 5, 6, 8, 9 and 25 are allowed as claimed in the amount of $1,980.00, considering that this is reasonable compensation in view of the criteria listed in subsection 400(3) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998. ...

It contains numerous references to FESCI and acts of political violence attributed to it since at least 2002. [36]   The methodology used in the writing of this report is described as follows: This report is based on field research conducted during August, September, and October 2007 in Abidjan and Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire. ... I recall that the applicant’s counsel, at the hearing of this matter, conceded that he could not resort to such a process to support his impugning of the ID’s decision. [50]   Lastly, Exhibit C-23 is a Freedom House report on serious crimes that have been committed in Côte d’Ivoire between 2002 and 2011 which have gone unpunished. ... DATED: JULY 23, 2019   APPEARANCES: Ange Stéphane Dakouri   For the applicant   Daniel Latulippe   For the respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ange Stéphane Dakouri Counsel Montréal, Quebec   For the applicant   Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec   For the respondent     ...

That decision led to the ITPR adjudication which took place between November, 2001 and March, 2002. ... The ITPR process also involved the following judicial characteristics: ·         Oral and documentary evidence was presented and witnesses were cross-examined; ·         Oaths were administered; ·         Both parties were represented by counsel; ·         Objections were made and ruled upon; ·         Expert witnesses were called and qualified; ·         The hearing was recorded by a court reporter; ·         Affidavits were accepted; ·         Written arguments, of more than 200 pages, were submitted; and ·         The final decision was detailed and canvassed the relevant evidence and jurisprudence. [6]                The ITPR reviewer found in favour of the Respondent and he was sharply critical of the CCRA treatment of the Respondent. ... " R. L. Barnes "                                                                                                     J udge FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:                                           T-1743-04 STYLE OF CAUSE:                         CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY                                                             and                                                             PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC                                                                             SERVICE OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING:                     Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                       February 6, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER:                                    THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BARNES DATED:                                              February 13, 2006 APPEARANCES: Mr. ...

DATED:                                              January 26, 2010       APPEARANCES:   Mr. ... Stone, “Canada’s Admiralty Court in the Twentieth Century” (2002) 47 McGill L.J. 511 at 522 [“Canada’s Admiralty Court”]. ... Canada 2002 SCC 28 at para. 13; Flota Cubana De Pesca v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [1997] F.C.J. ...

Flinn occupied an acting position at the PM-5 level for about five years, from 1997 to 2002. ... ·            will deciding the issues have some practical effect that would merit the expenditure of judicial resources? ... O'Reilly"                                                                                                                                                                  F.C.J.                                                                                      ...

Indeed, the Supreme Court of Canada in a decision cited by the applicants, Mackin v New Brunswick, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 405, a case that did involve judicial independence, reversed the award of solicitor-client costs made by the Court of Appeal and substituted an award of party and party costs only.  ... Evraire / Andrew Law For The RespondentS   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Rocco Galati Law Firm Professional Corporation Toronto, Ontario For The Applicant ROCCO GALATI   Slansky Law Professional Corporation Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INC. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondents     ...

  [8] Ms. Tazaki became a permanent resident on May 9, 2002.   [9] Ms. ... [15] To the first question, the Citizenship Judge, relying on the respondent’s income tax returns for 2000, 2001, and 2002, responds in the affirmative ... Xia, 2002 FCT 453, [2002] F.C.J. No. 613 (QL), at para. 25).  When it comes to establishing a connection, there must be some evidence that would demonstrate a reaching out to the Canadian community or a rational explanation for the lack such evidence, not merely passive indicia ...