Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Results 321 - 330 of 844 for 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
FCTD

Harold v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2003 FCT 688

Maeda submitted a report dated May 1, 2002, to Ms. Ralla, recommending the denial of the Applicant 's third fairness request. [14]            By letter dated May 27, 2002, Ms. ... ANALYSIS Standard of Review [22]            In Edwards v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), (2002) FCT 618, [2002] F.C.J. ... Maeda submitted a report dated May 1, 2002, to Ms. Ralla. The latter reviewed the following documents in regards to the Applicant 's third fairness request: (1)         The report prepared by Ms. ...
FCTD

Canada (National Revenue) v. Currie, 2008 FC 237

Justice Blanchard   BETWEEN:   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Applicant   and     JAY CURRIE also known as JAY FERGUSON ELLIOTT CURRIE and JAY F.E. ... Prothonotary Lafrenière issued directions on April 22, 2002, in Court file T-643-02, Minister of National Revenue v. ... CURRIE)       PLACE OF HEARING:                     Vancouver, BC   DATE OF HEARING:                       February 18, 2008       REASONS FOR ORDER                  BLANCHARD J. ...
FCTD

Meleca v. Canada, 2020 FC 1159

He asked the Court to order a “complete review” by CRA of amounts owing for the taxation years 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010 and 2012. ... At the relevant time, Mr Meleca’s T1 tax debt was about $17,600 and pertained to outstanding liabilities for the taxation years 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010 and 2012. ... CRA audited his T1 account in 2005 (for the 2001 and 2002 taxation years) and in 2013 (for the 2009 and 2010 taxation years). ...
FCTD

Guerra v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2009 FC 459

In reviewing your personal income tax account […], it was discovered that you have not filed your personal income tax returns for 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 taxation years.  ... Canada, [2002] F.C.J. No. 841 as follows: [14] A discretionary power of this nature must be exercised in good faith, in accordance with the principles of natural justice, taking into account all relevant considerations and without regard to irrelevant or extraneous ones ... As a result, her decision is set aside and the matter is remitted for reconsideration.             ...
FCTD

Zolotow v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 FC 265

In or about March 2002, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police gave Mr. Zolotow’s diamonds to Canada Customs and Revenue Agency.   12.       ... THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA     PLACE OF HEARING:                     Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING:                       February 2, 2009   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT:        HENEGHAN J.   ... Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, ON   FOR THE DEFENDANT       ...
FCTD

Kumar Verma v. Canada, 2006 FC 1353

  [4]                The plaintiffs are not represented by counsel.   ... The solicitor attaches two earlier letters she wrote to the Federal Court in November 2002 and November 2004 with respect to other proceedings taken in the name of Dr. ... DATED:                                              November 9, 2006     WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY:   Carole Ann Brown (self-represented)   FOR THE PLAINTIFFS Sarah Frost   FOR THE DEFENDANTS Catharine Herb-Kelly, Q.C.     ...
FCTD

Vitol Refining S.A. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FC 446

(as he then was) wrote at paragraphs 19 to 22:   19     During the summer and fall of 2001, the Minister held consultations and, as a result, adopted a definition for newspapers in January 2002. ... No matter how broad the discretion of the Minister is, elementary procedural fairness demands that where the Minister publishes program rules for a given cycle she apply the same.   22     The decisions of Marie France Gosselin, made in the name of the Minister of Canadian Heritage on March 18th, 2002 in respect of the applications of Brunico for funding in respect of Strategy and Playback are, therefore, set aside. The matter is referred back to Canadian Heritage to be determined in accordance with the rules set out in the Applicant's Guide for 2001-2002 so that Brunico, in respect of Strategy and Playback (if they otherwise qualify), can receive the amounts that they would otherwise would have been awarded without the adoption of the new rules on January 25th, 2002. ...
FCTD

Canada (National Revenue) v. Zen, 2009 FC 531

Zen, 2009 FC 531                   20090526   Docket:  T-1360-06   Citation:  2009 FC 531   Ottawa, Ontario, May 26, 2009   PRESENT:  The Honourable Mr. Justice Blanchard     BETWEEN:   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Applicant   and   GIOVANNI ZEN   Respondent     T-1024-08   AND BETWEEN:   GIOVANNI ZEN   Applicant   and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Respondent       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT     I.          ...     [9]                On August 23, 2005, the Minister served Mr. Zen with five (5) RFIs pursuant to subsection 231.2(1)(a) of the Act (2005 RFIs) seeking his Net Worth Statements as at August 15, 2005, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, complete with supporting schedules, showing full details of all his assets and liabilities ...
FCTD

Robert Julien Family Delaware Dynasty Trust v. Canada (National Revenue), 2007 FC 1071

If and when the Proposed Rules come into force, they will retroactively apply to trust taxation years that begin after 2002.  ...                                                                   ANNEX B (paragraph [3])     We are writing in response to you letter of February 23, 2005, in which you requested competent authority assistance with respect to the determination of the residency of the Trust under Article IV(4) of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention, 1980 (the “Convention”).  ... If proposed paragraph 94(3)(a) is enacted, the Trust is deemed to be a resident of Canada for the purposes of certain provisions of the Act for taxation years of the Trust beginning after 2002.   ...
FCTD

McFadyen v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 FC 78

Justice Zinn                                                                                                                                     T-77-04 BETWEEN: NEIL MCFADYEN Applicant   and     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   Respondent   AND BETWEEN: T-123-04     NEIL MCFADYEN Applicant   and     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   Respondent   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT     [1]                Mr. ... Canada, [2002] F.C.J. No. 1756, 2002 FCA 496.  An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed:  McFadyen v. ... THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA     PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING:                       December 16, 2008   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:                           Zinn J   DATED:                                              February 13, 2009     APPEARANCES:   Alan Riddell       Neil McFadyen   FOR THE APPLICANT (T-77-04 / Motion Doc. ...

Pages