Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

As early as May 2002, meetings were held concerning the Applicant’s indebtedness. Subsequent meetings were held on July 12, 2002, September 10, 2002, April 8, 2003, August 20, 2003, December 9, 2003, February 16, 2004, July 12, 2004, December 14, 2004, and April 20, 2005. ... The Applicant filed a Notice of Objection dated March 27, 2002, and by decision of an Appeals officer dated July 28, 2003, the objection was dismissed and the assessment was confirmed. ...

Justice Southcott Docket: T-877-22   BETWEEN:   SEA TOW SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ... Defendant/ Plaintiff by Counterclaim Docket: T-901-22   AND BETWEEN:   C-TOW MARINE ASSISTANCE LTD. ... Bereskin & Parr LLP Barristers & Solicitor Toronto, Ontario For The RESPONDENT/Plaintiff/Defendant by counterclaim (Sea two Services international, inc.)     ...

Woods, [2002] F.C.J. No. 1267; 2002 FCT 928, where she held at paragraphs 10 to 12 as follows: 10     Relying upon the decision of Justice Tremblay-Lamer in Air Nunavut v. ... Arnold, [2002] O.J. No. 3835 (C.J.) where it was held that, before ruling on a motion to declare an information to be a nullity, it is preferable to “wait until the evidence has been heard and to then decide whether an amendment can cure any technical problems” ...       “ R. L. Barnes ” Judge   FEDERAL COURT                         NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                        T-1708-05     STYLE OF CAUSE:                        Attorney General of Canada v. ...

The relief sought by the Applicant also includes a declaration “that the Reassessments are invalid to the extent they relate to the Transfer Pricing Transactions for 1996 – 1998 taxation years”; and, a declaration that “by issuing the Reassessments with adjustments for the Transfer Pricing Transactions that are substantially inconsistent with the 2002 and 2004 letters, the Minister exercised his discretion unfairly, for an improper purpose, and based upon irrelevant considerations inconsistent with established policies”. [6]           The 2002 and 2004 letters are a key element of the judicial review sought by the Applicant in this Application and are letters upon which the Applicant relied in asserting rights under the Treaty. ... In 2002 and 2004 CRA issued letters to the Applicant regarding proposed Transfer Pricing Adjustments to the income it earned from the Transfer Pricing Transactions for its 1996 – 1998 taxation years (the “Prior Letters”).  ... AND ORDER   DATED:                                              June 10, 2008     APPEARANCES:     Michael Barrack FOR THE APPLICANT Naomi Goldstein FOR THE RESPONDENTS     SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   McCarthy Tetrault Barrister and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario   FOR THE APPLICANT John H., Sims, Q.C. ...

THE APPLICANT’S INCOME TAX RETURNS   [11]            The Applicant did not file income tax returns for the 1997 to 2002 taxation years until November 17, 2003. ...   [13]            On November 17, 2003, in response to arbitrary assessments for taxation years 1999 and 2000, the Applicant filed income tax returns for the 1997 to 2002 taxation years. ... Canada (Attorney General), 2002 FCA 356, 299 N.R. 211 applies. In that case, Justice Robert Décary of the Federal Court of Appeal said (at paragraph 10) that “the interests of justice cry out for directions putting an end to the process.” ...

(QL), 2002 FCT 1293 at para 35).   [37]            It is clear that even if the applicants also sought leave to file an additional affidavit, the facts already in the record, which the Court must take as proved, must be sufficient to decide the issue. ... R., 2002 FCA 72, at para 21).   [85]            The applicants acknowledge that the Act as it reads does not violate the principles set out in sections 1(a) and 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights since it is clear that Parliament has provided a right to a fair hearing. ... MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE ET AL.     PLACE OF HEARING:                     MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC   DATE OF HEARING:                       NOVEMBER 14, 2005   REASONS FOR ORDER:                GAUTHIER J. ...

Canada, [2002] 2 C.T.C. 130; and Case v. Canada, [2004] F.C.J. No. 1026. ... ORDER               THIS COURT ORDERS that:   1.                   The motion to strike the application is dismissed.   2.                   ... There shall be no costs of this motion.     “Kevin R. Aalto” Prothonotary     FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD     DOCKETS:                                                     T-465-09   STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      MARC CARTER   v. ...

Canada, 2002 FCT 1171, Heeg v. Canada (Attorney-General), 2003 FCT 337, Brickenden v. ... Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2002 FCT 618). [50]            However, the fairness provisions exist to allow the taxpayer to be treated with common sense. ... Corinne Boivin dated April 9, 2002, (the basis for the impugned decision), Ms. ...

By letter dated April 2, 2002, Mr. Jones wrote to the Chief of Appeals of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency ("CCRA") requesting that the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") exercise his discretion under subsection 165(6) of the Income Tax Act, R.S., 1952, c. 148, s. 1. ... Background [4]         By letter dated April 2, 2002, the Applicant's solicitor wrote to the Chief of Appeals, C.C.R.A. ... Canada, [2001] 3 C.T.C. 2090, aff'd [2002] F.C.J. No. 345 (F.C.A.) ...

Between October 2002 and June 2003, the Applicant imported woven plastic bags from China and India. 2.       ... Vieyra's investigation and undoubtedly would have an influence on the issuing Justice of the Peace in making sense of the allegations of criminality.   57     The reference to January 21, 2002 not being the date of the Sipchenko letter, but being significant in that it was the date of the response from Fritz Marketing and likely would have been in the same file from the company, satisfies me on the balance of probabilities that Mr. ... Having discussed the level of costs with Counsel for the parties at the end of the hearing, I will award the Applicant costs at the usual level, the middle of Column III.                                 ...