Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

II.   Decision under review [21]   The Decision is dated September 25, 2018. ... Additionally many posts appear as recruitment initiatives for the Islamic State […] […] [170] […] There is no doubt that Mr. ... R. v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS   PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: April 24, 2019   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: WALKER J.   ...

Baksa, 2002 FCA 230, aff’d 2005 FCA 62).  The fact that a decision-maker may occasionally be willing to reconsider a decision in light of new information does not extend the 30-day limit for seeking judicial review of a decision (Didone v. ... HMQ ET AL                PLACE OF HEARING:                     Vancouver, BC   DATE OF HEARING:                       August 21, 2007   REASONS FOR ORDER:                TREMBLAY-LAMER J.   DATED:                                              August 29, 2007     APPEARANCES:   Ronnie Louis Bozzer   THE APPLICANT on own behalf     Karen Truscott   FOR THE RESPONDENT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   Vancouver, B.C.       ...

BACKGROUND [4]                In February 2002, Ms. Babin went overseas for six (6) months, returning at the end of July 2002. ... In early April 2002, a friend of Ms. Babin's forwarded all of her income tax documents to Mr. ... As CCRA personnel responsible for reviewing the first and second Fairness Requests point out, approximately four months elapsed between her return from abroad in July 2002 and the date upon which the CCRA first began reassessing her 2001 income tax return in December 2002.    ...

On May 2, 2001, the respondent issued a first-level decision refusing the request on the basis that the applicant had renounced his right to ask for a waiver of interests in the November 10, 2000 settlement. [5]                On May 17, 2001, the applicant asked that the respondent review this decision. [6]                On May 31, 2002, Ms. Diane Pouliot of the Collection Division, issued a report in which she analyses the arguments of the applicant and in which she recommends that the request for a cancellation of the applicant's interests be denied. [7]                On October 1, 2002, Ms. ... Bertrand on August 16, 2002. Hence, his submission that he was not able to correct the alleged factual errors is unfounded. [18]            Thirdly, the burden rested on the applicant to convince the Minister that his request under subsection 220(3.1) of the ITA should be granted (Young v. ...

  [17]            The applicant adds that she has reasons to believe that the CRA conducted disguised tax audits of BT Céramiques inc., Francesco Bruno, Alfredo Magalhaes, Rodolfo Palmerino and herself, in violation of the principles set out by the Supreme Court in R v Jarvis, 2002 SCC 73. ... [30]            In Lavigne   v Canada (Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages), 2002 SCC 53 [Lavigne], the Supreme Court addressed the quality of the reasons that could justify non-disclosure of personal information: 58        Th e non-disclosure of personal information provided in s. 22(1)(b) is authorized only where disclosure “could reasonably be expected” to be injurious to investigations.  ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec   FOR THE respondent         ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2003 FCT 654 Date: 20030526 Docket: T-1628-01 Citation: 2003 FCT 654 Ottawa, Ontario, this 26 th day of May, 2003 Present:           THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE SNIDER                                   BETWEEN:                                                        NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INC.                                                                                                                                                        Applicant                                                                              - and-                                        THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and MUNICIPALITYOF IQALUIT                                                                                                                                                                         Respondents                                                REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1]                 This is an application for judicial review of the decision of Robert D. ... This legislation, the Nunavut Waters Act, came into force on April 30, 2002. ...

J’ai alloué 2 unités pour la présence à chacun des interrogatoires réclamés ce qui m’apparaît  raisonnable compte tenu du type de dossier. [15]            Les demandeurs réclament les honoraires suivants pour l’article 10 – demande de conférence préparatoire avec mémoire relatif à la conférence préparatoire produit le 1 er février 2002 (6 unités) ainsi que l’article 10- le mémoire de règlement produit le 12 décembre 2003 (conformément à l’ordonnance du protonotaire du 24 novembre 2003) (6 unités). ... Par contre en ce qui a trait au mémoire de règlement, je l’allouerai plutôt selon l’article 27 à 3 unités puisque c’est selon l’ordonnance du protonotaire que cette demande a été faite et comme il n’y a rien de prévu dans le tarif  B pour le mémoire de règlement, il y a lieu de l’allouer selon l’article 27. [16]            La partie demanderesse réclame les honoraires suivants pour l’article 11 – la conférence préparatoire du 16 mai 2002 (3 unités x 27 minutes) et la séance de médiation du 16 décembre 2003 (3 unités x 3h55). À mon avis, je ne puis allouer que la présence à la conférence préparatoire du 16 mai 2002. ...

Aalto, Esquire, Case Management Judge   BETWEEN:   CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY       Plaintiff   and       HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN       Defendant                      REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER   The Canadian Pacific Railway, and all stations and station grounds, workshops, buildings, yards and other property, rolling stock and a pertinence as required and used for the construction and working thereof in the capital stock of Canadian Pacific Railway Company, shall be forever free from taxation by the Dominion, or by any Province hereafter to be established, or by any Municipal, Corporation, therein … [1]       Introduction [1]                This motion is brought by the Defendant (the Crown) to strike this action.  ... CPR has received refunds in respect of LCT for its 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 taxation years.  ... ORDER               THIS COURT ORDERS that:   1.                   The motion is dismissed.   2.                   ...

Justice Campbell     BETWEEN: ROCHELLE MOSS Plaintiff and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT     [1]                For many years, Ms. ...   [2]                Ms. Moss’ entire Statement of Claim dated November 1, 2002, reads as follows:   The Plaintiff is a taxpayer who lives in the city of Winnipeg in the province of Manitoba and is employed by the Federal Government:   1.                   ... Campbell” Judge       FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-2059-01   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           ROCHELLE MOSS v. ...

Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 511 Date: 20050415   Docket: IMM-8297-04   Citation: 2005 FC 511   [ENGLISH TRANSLATION]   Ottawa, Ontario, April 15, 2005   PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. ...   [4]                He alleges being threatened by the representative, detained and tortured by the police from December 17 to 19, 2002, on false charges. ... DATED:                                             APRIL 15, 2005       APPEARANCES:   Geneviève Clermont                            FOR THE APPLICANTS   Ian Demers                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT     SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   Geneviève Clermont                            FOR THE APPLICANTS Montréal, Quebec   John H. ...