Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

., 2007 TCC 670                                                                                                                                                         Citation:  2007TCC670   Docket: 2006-1034(EI)   BETWEEN:   OLIVER BAJOR,   Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,   Respondent.     ... Citation: 2007TCC670   Court File No. 2006-1034(EI)                                                      TAX COURT OF CANADA   IN RE:   the Employment Insurance Act     BETWEEN:                                                             OLIVER BAJOR                                                                                                                                   Appellant                                                                        - and-                                         THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE                                                                                                                               Respondent         * * * * * REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT BY THE HONOURABLE MR. ... I thank you both.--- Whereupon proceedings adjourned at 4:14 p.m.                   ...

Hogan" Hogan J.     Translation certified true on this 10th day of June 2014 Margarita Gorbounova, Translator             Docket: 2013-21(IT)I BETWEEN: DENISE L. ...   [5]              The appeals were heard on common evidence.   II.      ... Hogan” Hogan J.     Translation certified true on this 10th day of June 2014 Margarita Gorbounova, Translator APPENDIX A            L’immobilière d’Oka          Reorganization          The disposition of 3,178 shares on the death of Lionel Leroux   Proceeds of disposition             3,178 shares at $158.21   $502,791 Adjusted cost base           3,178 shares at $131.25 $417,113   CDC dividend   $33,766     SCEM dividend   $33,766     SCEM dividend   $113,729-$181,261-$235,852         $266,940 Rollover      -$200,000 Capital gain on death       $66,940   Step 1: Capital reorganization of L’immobilière d’Oka (with 85(1) option at FMV)   Exchanged shares         Proceeds of disposition       $617,466           Adjusted cost base 3,178 shares Note 1 $336,558     820 shares   25,000     2 shares   $100 $361,658-           Capital gain       $255,808 Loss on subsequent redemption of Nouco shares    -$258,658 Capital gain (loss)      -$2,850 Tax (24.1%)      - $           Shares received in consideration       B preferred shares Number of shares received 269,618     Fair market value $269,618     Adjusted cost base $269,618     Paid-up capital $10,960   C preferred shares Number of shares received 347,848     Fair market value $347,848     Adjusted cost base $347,848     Paid-up capital $14,140   Note 1 Adjusted cost base of 3,178 shares in accordance with subs. 26(3) and 26(5) ITAR   Cost under 26(3) ITAR: median value of       (a) actual cost    -$   (b) FMV- VD     $417,113   (c) Proceeds of disposition   $617,466     Amounts deducted from 83(1) ACB   $147,495 $764,961             Costs under 26(5)(c) ITAR         Median value   $417.113     Previous capital gains   $66,940     Amounts deducted from 83(1) ACB  -$147,495 $336,558   Steps 2 and 3: Creation of Nouco and transfer of shares to Nouco (84.1 and 84.1(2)(c)) Preferred shares Adjusted cost base   $269,618     84.1(2)(c) adjustment       FMV-VD $417,113       Actual cost-$       83(1) dividends-$147,495 $269,618     Amended adjusted cost base-$     Paid-up capital   $10,960             Common shares Adjusted cost base   $347,848     Paid-up capital   $347,848             Steps 3 and 4: Winding up of the corporation in Nouco and redemption of shares by Nouco     common shares Preferred shares Total Proceeds of redemption   $347,848 $196,506 $544,354 Paid-up capital  -$347,848-$7,988-$355,836 Deemed dividend  -$ $188,518 $188,518 Tax (32.8%)  -$-$61,834-$61,834           Proceeds of disposition   $347,848 $196,506 $544,354 Deemed dividend  -$-$188,518-$188,518 Adjusted proceeds of disposition   $347,848 $7,988 $355,836 Adjusted cost base  -$347,848-$196,506-$544,354 Capital gain (loss)  -$-$188,518-$188,518           Step 6: Disposition of remaining lots and redemption of shares Disposition of lots         Proceeds of disposition $80,000       Adjusted cost base-$48,692       Business income $31,308       Tax (22%)-$6,888                 Funds available after sale $73,112                     Preferred shares Redemption summary Deemed dividend at time of redemption   $73,112 $617,466 Paid-up capital  -$2,972-$358,808 Deemed dividend   $70,140 $258,658 Tax (32.8%)  -$23,006-$84,840         Proceeds of disposition   $73,112 $617,466 Deemed dividend  -$70,140-$258,658 Adjusted proceeds of disposition   $2,972 $358,808 Adjusted cost base  -$73,112-$617,466 Capital gain (loss)  -$70,140-$258,658         Funds received     $617,466 Total tax    -$84,840 Liquid assets available after tax     $532,626 APPENDIX B       Section 84.1 without internal rollover benefit Fair market value Paid-up capital Adjusted cost base $102,910 $15,340 $60,276 Amount received Paid-up capital Deemed dividend $102,910- $15,340 $87,570 Capital loss Proceeds of disposition 84(3) Adjusted cost base Capital loss   $102,910- $87,570- $60,276- $44,936 CITATION:                                         2014 TCC 75   COURT FILE NOs:                             2013-12(IT)I                                                             2013-13(IT)I                                                             2013-16(IT)I                                                             2013-18(IT)I                                                             2013-20(IT)I                                                             2013‑21(IT)I   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           LUCIE DESCARRIES,                                                             RENÉ LEROUX,                                                             SUZANNE GAUTHIER,                                                             NICOLE BEAUREGARD,                                                             JEAN LEROUX,                                                           DENISE BISSONNETTE v. ...

The Queen, 2007 TCC 761 (Informal Procedure)       Docket: 2006-715(IT)I BETWEEN:   ROBERT PRESTON, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.         ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 20 th day of December 2007.       “D.G.H. ...   [3]      Mr. Preston submitted bill of costs as follows:   Cost for this matter by the Appellant.   ...

The accountant for the appellants, who also acted as their agent in the appeals, adjusted the loss as follows:   Net Loss from Operations        2001                                                                            $(55,860.00)   Distribution Jeff Almen Elizabeth Almen Jim Mazurkewich Diane Mazurkewich Total__________             Partnership Wages $ (7,840.00) $(21,280.00) $       - $ (29,120.00)  (58,240.00)   Net Distribution_(28,525.00)  (28,525.00)   (28,525.00)   (28,525.00) (114,100.00)   Net Loss from    Operations   $(20,685.00)    (7,245.00) $ (28,525.00) $      595.00 $(55,860.00) Partner Adjustments $   (6,720.00) $   6,720.00 $ (14,560.00) $  14,560.00 $     -_____     Net Loss from Operations        2002                                                                            $ (44,613.84)   Distribution Jeff Almen Elizabeth Almen Jim Mazurkewich Diane Mazurkewich Total__________             Partnership Work    Credit   $       - $(29,120.00) $       - $ (29,120.00) $(58,240.00)   Net Distribution_(25,713.46)  (25,713.46)   (25,713.46)   (25,713.46) (102,853.84)   Net Loss from    Operations   $(25,713.46) $  3,406.54) $ (25,713.46) $    3,406.54 $(44,613.84) Partner Adjustments $ (14,560.00) $ 14,560.00 $ (14,560.00) $ 14,560.00 $     -_____   [9]      If one takes 2001 as an example and looks at the bottom line (net loss from operations), it will be apparent that the net loss that is being distributed is correct ($55,860.00) but it is not allocated in accordance with the 25% interest of each partner. ... Bowman, Chief Justice     DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 4, 2007   APPEARANCES:   Agent for the Appellants: Bruce Grandfield     Counsel for the Respondent: Brooke Sittler   COUNSEL OF RECORD:   For the Appellant:     Name: Bruce Grandfield & Co.     Firm:       For the Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada     ...

  [36]          As a result the following is a summary of the adjustments to be made to the income of the Appellant for each of these years:   2004   Item Amount included in the Reassessment Revised Amount Adjustment Food from restaurants $1,970 $250 $1,720 Shelter – other quarters – traveller accommodation   $228   $0   $228 Telephone $914 $0 $914 Child care $852 $360 $492 Cleaning supplies $    340 $   340 $     0 Paper, plastic & foil supplies $    366 $   366 $     0 Clothing – women’s wear $ 1,347 $1,347 $     0 Men’s wear $    897 $   568 $  329 Clothing material, notions, laundry   $    234   $   234   $     0 Automotive fuels $ 1,738 $   960 $  778 Maintenance & repair $    580 $   120 $  460 Medical & pharmaceutical $    267 $   267 $     0 Eye care goods & services $    162 $      0 $  162 Dental care $    218 $      0 $  218 Private & public health insurance   $    329   $      0   $  329 Personal care supplies & equipment   $    811   $   455   $  356 Hair cutting, washing, styling $    379 $   240 $  139 Sporting & athletic equipment $    180 $      0 $  180 Toys, games, computer, hobby equipment, etc ... )       $ 1,044       $      0       $1,044 Reading material $    307 $  150 $  157 Education $    586 $      0 $  586 Money gifts & contributions $    812 $  406 $  406 Other (flowers, toys etc.) $    537 $  268 $  269 Religious organizations $    172 $  120 $    52 Other charitable organizations $    132 $     0 $  132 Government pool & lottery tickets $    194 $     0 $  194   $16,479 $7,334 $9,145   2005   Item Amount included in the Reassessment Revised Amount Adjustment Food from restaurants $ 1,970 $250 $1,720 Shelter – other quarters – traveller accommodation   $    228   $0   $   228 Telephone $    914 $0 $   914 Child care $    852 $480 $   372 Cleaning supplies $    340 $340 $      0 Paper, plastic & foil supplies $    366 $366 $      0 Clothing – women’s wear $ 1,347 $1,347 $      0 Men’s wear $    897 $568 $   329 Clothing material, notions, laundry   $    234   $234   $      0 Automotive fuels $ 1,738 $1,260 $   478 Maintenance & repair $    580 $   120 $   460 Medical & pharmaceutical $    267 $   267 $      0 Eye care goods & services $    162 $      0 $   162 Dental care $    218 $      0 $   218 Private & public health insurance   $    329   $      0   $   329 Personal care supplies & equipment   $    811   $   455   $   356 Hair cutting washing styling $    379 $   240 $   139 Sporting & athletic equipment $    180 $      0 $   180 Toys, games, computer, hobby equipment, etc ... )       $ 1,044       $      0       $1,044 Reading material $    307 $   150 $   157 Education $    586 $      0 $   586 Money gifts & contributions $    812 $   406 $   406 Other (flowers, toys etc.) $    537 $   268 $   269 Religious organizations $    172 $   172 $      0 Other charitable organizations $    132 $      0 $   132 Government pool & lottery tickets   $    194   $      0   $   194   $16,479 $7,806 $8,673   [37]          In addition to these adjustments, the adjustments that had been agreed upon by the parties must also be taken into account. ...

The Queen, 2007 TCC 694 Court File No. 2002‑3761 (IT)G                                                      TAX COURT OF CANADA         BETWEEN:                                                                            JOAN M. ... JUSTICE PARIS in Courts Administration Service, Courtroom No. 6A, 180 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario, on Thursday, October 20, 2005 * * * * *                                                                              APPEARANCES:     Ms. ... The appeal is allowed in part and there will be no order as to costs             I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I have, to the best of my skill and ability, accurately transcribed              the foregoing interview.                                   ...

Translation certified true on this 26th day of October 2009.   Elizabeth Tan, Translator         Citation: 2009 TCC 411 Date: 20090821 Docket: 2008-2581(EI)   BETWEEN:   QUINCAILLERIE LE FAUBOURG (1990) INC., Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent, and   ANDRÉE ROY, Intervenor.   ... The capital stock in Quincaillerie Le Faubourg (1990) Inc. was held as follows:   Number and Category of Shares Held During the Period in Question     Holder January 4, 2007, to May 2, 2007 May 2, 2007, to July 17, 2007 July 17, 2007, to January 4, 2008   Andrée Roy   25      "A"   50        "AA"   10        "B"   10      "B" 10        "B" 4,800    "C"   4,800  "C" 4,800    "C" 52,000  "F"     52,000  "F" 1,000    "G"     1,000    "G"           Jean-Yves Côté 25       "A" 50        "AA" 10          "B"   10       "B" 10        "B" 4,800     "C"   4,800   "C" 4,800    "C" 52,000   "F"     52,000  "F" 1,000     "G"     1,000    "G"           Rémy Côté 50       "A" 100      "AA" 100       "AA"   200     "C" 200      "C" 200       "C"     1,000   "H" 1,000    "H"         Marie-Claude Côté 200     "C" 200      "C" 100      "AA"       200      "C"   5.       ...   [50]          For all these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.   Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 21st day of August 2009.       ...

., 2009 TCC 203 Citation:  2009 TCC 203   Dockets: 2006-2196(EI) 2006-2197(CPP)   BETWEEN:   1478399 ONTARIO INC. c/o LARRY KRAUSS,   Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,   Respondent.       ... Court File Nos. 2006-2196(EI) 2006-2197(CPP)     TAX COURT OF CANADA       BETWEEN:   1478399 ONTARIO INC. c/o LARRY KRAUSS Appellant    - and-       THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE Respondent     * * * * * ORAL REASONS HEARD BEFORE JUSTICE WEISMAN in the Courts Administration Service, Federal Judicial Centre, 180 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario on Monday, November 24th, 2008   * * * * *     APPEARANCES:   Mr. ... I will close court now until 9:30 tomorrow morning.--- Whereupon the Decision with Reasons concluded.                   ...

The appeals before me deal with the appellant's 2000 and 2001 taxation years, and thus warrants an independent review of the facts and issues. [4]      During the taxation years in question, the appellant's world income was as follows:                                                                              2000                  2001 Superannuation payments                              $            9,241.08            $           9,472.00 Canada Pension Plan ("CPP") payments                    6,929.26                        6,313.00 Old Age Security ("OAS") payments                        5,079.51                      5,232.00 Total                                                            $        21,249.85            $           21,017.00 [5]      As the appellant is a non-resident, the above sources of income are subject to withholding taxes under Part XIII of the Income Tax Act. [2] However, in each of the taxation years in question the appellant made a section 217 election to have his tax liability on these amounts determined instead under Part I of the Act. [6]      Two broad issues arise:            1)      How should the appellant's tax be assessed in the absence of a section 217 election? ... Subsection 217(6) reads as follows: 217(6) In computing the tax payable under Part I for a taxation year by a non-resident who elects under paragraph (2)(b) for the year, there may be deducted the amount determined by the formula A × [(B- C) / B] where A is the amount of tax under Part I that would, but for this subsection, be payable by the person for the year; B is the amount determined under subparagraph (3)(b)(ii) in respect of the person for the year; and C is the amount determined under subparagraph (3)(b)(i) in respect of the person for the year. [30]     In accordance with section 217, the Minister reassessed [9] the appellant for taxes under Part I as follows: [10]                                                                           2000                 2001     Superannuation benefits                                 $           9,241.08            $           9,472.00 CPP payments                                                           6,929.26                        6,313.00 OAS payments                                                        5,079.51                      5,232.00 Net world income per s. 217(3)(b)(ii)             $          21,249.85           $           21,017.00 Part I tax rate                                                         17%                 16% Part I tax                                                       $            3,612.33            $           3,362.72 Non-refundable tax credits per s. 118 [11]                   (1,829.00)                     (1,764.00) Part I tax before s. 217(6) adjustment                         1,783.33                        1,598.72 S. 217(6) adjustment                                              (1,357.00)                     (1,200.00) Sub-total                                                                426.33               398.72 Non-resident surtax (48% of sub-total) [12]               204.67             191.38 Net tax                                                          $        631.00      $        590.10 The subsection 217(6) tax adjustments were calculated as follows:                                                                           2000                  2001 [1] Net world income per s. 217(3)(b)(ii)       $          21,249.85           $           21,017.00 [2] Taxable income per s. 217(3)(b)(i)                    (5,079.51)                     (5,232.00) [3] Sub-total                                                 $          16,170.34            $           15,785.00 Part I tax before s. 217(6) adjustment             $           1,783.33           $           1,598.72 Line [3] divided by line [1]                                       76%                 75% S. 217(6) adjustment (tax attributable                to line [3])                                                 $            1,357.00           $           1,200.00 [31]     For the 2000 and 2001 taxation years the appellant's net tax liability under Part I was $631.00 and $590.10 respectively. ... The following are the appellant's calculations:                                                                           2000                  2001 Superannuation benefits                                 $          9,241.08          $           9,472.00 CPP payments                                                         6,929.26                      6,313.00 Treaty exempt income                                   $          16,170.34            $           15,785.00 Part I tax rate                                                         17%                 16% Part I tax on treaty exempt income [13]               $            2,748.90            $           2,525.60 S. 217(6) adjustment                                              (1,546.21)                     (1,200.00) Net tax on treaty exempt income                    $            1,202.69            $           1,325.60 [33]     According to the appellant, the special credit under subsection 217(6) compensates for only about one-half of the tax levied on his treaty-exempt income. ...

Citation: 2013 TCC 207 Date: 20130621 Docket: 2011-3598(IT)APP     BETWEEN:   JOSEPHINE SICOLI, Applicant,   and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.       ... Chronology of Events   Date of Assessment Year Federal Tax Provincial Tax Penalty and Interest Only February 26, 2009 2009     $3,388.82 April 10, 2009 2003     $3,388.82 April 25, 2009 2004     $698.36 May 26, 2009 2002 $5,446.93 $3,431.56 $6,229.84 May 26, 2009 2003 $17,427.18 $9,200.27 $15,795.74 May 26, 2009 2004 $77,741.31 $23,592.79 $50,367.41 May 26, 2009 2005 $55,744.90 $16,956.81 $9,432.17 May 26, 2009 2006 $98,862.41 $39,721.79 $41,789.42 May 26, 2009 2007 $7,778.28 $5,055.89 $2,501.41 May 26, 2009 2008 $7,624.94 $5,108.76 $1,481.37 May 26, 2009       $207.51 May 26, 2009       $75.61 May 26, 2009       $156.99 May 26, 2009       $302.12 May 26, 2009       $160.40 May 26, 2009       $268.79 May 26, 2009 2008     $576.66     TOTAL       $270,625.95     $103,067.87     $136,821.44   [7]      I note that of these 17 Assessments, copies of which are attached as exhibits to an affidavit (“affidavit”) of a Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) collection officer (“affiant”), there are ten that I have underlined. ... APPENDIX                                                                 CITATION:                                      2013 TCC 207   COURT FILE NO.:                           2011-3598(IT)APP   STYLE OF CAUSE:                         JOSEPHINE SICOLI AND THE QUEEN   PLACE OF HEARING:                    Edmonton, Alberta                                                                        DATE OF HEARING:                      August 22, 2012   REASONS FOR ORDER BY:          The Honourable Justice J.E. ...