Search - 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策

LOCKE J.A.     BETWEEN: CHENG XIA Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 3, 2020. ... HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   PLACE OF HEARING: VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA   DATE OF HEARING: February 3, 2020   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RENNIE J.A. ... Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario   For The Respondent   ...

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                  SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20060614 Docket: A-478-04 Citation: 2006 FCA 220 Present:           SHARLOW J.A. ... FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:                                                                               A-478-04 STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                               DENIS LANNO v.                                                                                                 ...

HECKMAN J.A.     BETWEEN: EL AD ONTARIO TRUST Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 27, 2023. ... HECKMAN J.A.     BETWEEN: EL AD ONTARIO TRUST Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 27, 2023). ... Siobhan Monaghan" J.A.   FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-166-22   STYLE OF CAUSE: EL AD ONTARIO TRUST v. ...

Paragraph 4 of the Reply to Notice of Appeal in the Norman Leon matter is: “With respect to paragraph 3 and 4 of the Notice of Appeal, the Respondent says that he, as an employee of Nor-Mar Projects Limited devoted time to the management, supervision, overseeing and superintending of the operations of certain stores of Ablan Leon Distributors and Nor-Mar Projects Limited was paid for those services the sum of 1968 — $ 8,000 1969 — $39,000” Of course the Nor-Mar Projects Limited agreement did not provide for supply of services for “the management, supervision, overseeing and superintending of the operations of certain stores”. ...

LASKIN J.A.     Date: 20230818 Dockets: A-327-21 A-328-21 A-329-21 Citation: 2023 FCA 178 CORAM: WOODS J.A. ... JOHN PRESTON, MONIKA PRESTON AND THE PRESTON FAMILY TRUST II     PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: January 18, 2023   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MONAGHAN J.A.   ... DATED: August 18, 2023   APPEARANCES: Elizabeth Chasson Isida Ranxi   For The Appellant   Yves St-Cyr Jacob Yau Caroline Harrell For The Respondents SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Shalene Curtis-Micallef Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Appellant HIS MAJESTY THE KING   Dentons Canada LLP Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondents JOHN PRESTON, MONIKA PRESTON AND THE PRESTON FAMILY TRUST II   ...

Gratl’s accountant filed notices of objection and that the reassessments were subsequently confirmed. [3]   Ms. ... FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD   Docket: A-185-17   STYLE OF CAUSE: BRIGITTE GRATL v. ... Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent   ...

RIVOALEN J.A.     BETWEEN: PETER BONDE Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. ... HIS MAJESTY THE KING     DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES: REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: RENNIE J.A. ... François Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent     ...

GAUTHIER J.A.   Date: 20191127 Docket: A-115-19 Citation: 2019 FCA 293 CORAM: PELLETIER J.A. ... FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD   Docket: A-115-19   STYLE OF CAUSE: DAVID BROOKS v. ... Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent   ...

GOYETTE J.A.     BETWEEN: FLAUBERT TSHIDIMU KUBIANGANA Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 8, 2023. ... REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: BOIVIN J.A.   Date: 20230208 Docket: A-338-21 Citation: 2023 FCA 30 CORAM: BOIVIN J.A. ... François Daigle Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the respondent   ...

(emphasis added) * The parties agreed in the instant case that the amount under clause 123(1)(tz)(iv)(B) would be lower than the amount under clause 123(!) ... Reasons for judgment, appeal book, p. 22. 123(1) L’impôt payable par une corporation en vertu de la présente partie sur son revenu imposable ou sur son revenu imposable gagné au Canada, selon le cas (appelé dans le présent article le « montant imposable ») pour l’année est, sauf disposition contraire, le total [...] a) de l’excédent éventuel du total: [... ... (B) du montant déterminé à la division 129(3)a)(i)(B) en ce qui concerne la corporation pour l’année, par le rapport entre le nombre de jours de l’année postérieurs à juin 1987 et antérieurs à 1988 et le nombre total de jours de l’année, [...] sur, dans le cas d’une corporation qui est tout au long de l’année une corporation privée dont le contrôle est canadien, le produit de 7% du moins élevé des montants déterminés aux divisions (iv)(A) et B * en ce qui concerne la corporation pour l’année par le rapport entre le nombre de jours de l’année postérieurs a 1987 et antérieurs à juillet 1988 et le nombre total de jours de l’année; [...] ...