Search - 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策

REASONS FOR ORDER BY: HECKMAN J.A.   Date: 20231013 Docket: A-140-23 Citation: 2023 FCA 207 Present: HECKMAN J.A. ... It appealed to this Court from the Minister’s failure to confirm or vacate the NIR pursuant to paragraph 172(3)(a.1) of the Act (the 172(3)(a.1) appeal): 172 (3) Where the Minister 172 (3) Lorsque le ministre: […] […] (a.1) confirms a proposal, decision or designation in respect of which a notice was issued by the Minister to a person that is or was registered as a registered charity, or is an applicant for registration as a registered charity, under any of subsections 149.1(2) to (4.1), (6.3), (22) and (23) and 168(1), or does not confirm or vacate that proposal, decision or designation within 90 days after service of a notice of objection by the person under subsection 168(4) in respect of that proposal, decision or designation, a.1) soit confirme toute intention, décision ou désignation à l’égard de laquelle le ministre a délivré, en vertu de l’un des paragraphes 149.1(2) à (4.1), (6.3), (22) et (23) et 168(1), un avis à une personne qui est ou était enregistrée à titre d’organisme de bienfaisance enregistré ou qui a demandé l’enregistrement à ce titre, soit omet de confirmer ou d’annuler cette intention, décision ou désignation dans les 90 jours suivant la signification, par la personne en vertu du paragraphe 168(4), d’un avis d’opposition concernant cette intention, décision ou désignation; […] […] the person described in paragraph (a), (a.1) or (a.2), […] may appeal from the Minister’s decision, or from the giving of the notice by the Minister, to the Federal Court of Appeal. la personne, dans le cas visé aux alinéas a), a.1) ou a.2), [… peut] interjeter appel à la Cour d’appel fédérale de cette décision ou de la signification de cet avis. [10] The appellant claims in its grounds of appeal that the Minister’s decision to issue an NIR and to publish a copy of the NIR in the Canada Gazette when she did was unlawful. ... DATED: October 13, 2023 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Gib van Ert Dahlia Shuhaibar For The Appellant Selena Sit Loretta Chun Yianni Pappas-Acreman For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Olthuis van Ert Vancouver, British Columbia For The Appellant Shalene Curtis-Micallef Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent   ...

Les créanciers du saisi ne peuvent s'opposer à la saisie ni à la vente.           ... Gauthier, C Tr, LLL                           FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL                               SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:                                                                   A-529-02 STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                   Newcourt Financial Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada PLACE OF HEARING:                                             Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING:                                               February 4, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                          Noël J.A. ...

RENNIE J.A.     BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and OXFORD PROPERTIES GROUP INC. ... Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada   For The APPELLANT   Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent     ...

II.                 The Tax Court decision [5]                The appellant advanced two arguments before the Tax Court. [6]                The first was predicated on what the appellant contended was the correct interpretation of paragraph 18(1)(a) of the ITA. ... III.              Denial of the request to re-open [17]            I will, at this point, open a parenthesis in respect of a matter of evidence. ... IV.              Analysis A.                 The statutory interpretation argument- does paragraph 18(1)(a) of the ITA allow deduction of a payor’s legal fees? ...

DE MONTIGNY J.A.     BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant and JAMES S.A. ... Roth   For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada   For The APPELLANT   Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent     ...

REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL C.J.   Date: 20191119 Docket: A-116-19 Citation: 2019 FCA 285 Present:   NOËL C.J. ... ROOKE et al.   MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL C.J.   DATED: November 19, 2019   WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Kara L. Smyth Cassidy Thomson   For The Respondents, john d. rooke, glennys l. mcveigh and mary t. moreau   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: McCarthy Tétrault LLP Clagary, Alberta   For The Respondents, john d. rooke, glennys l. mcveigh and mary t. moreau     ...

LEBLANC J.A.     BETWEEN: CRAIG LEVETT and NATHALIE BENSMIHAN OFER BAAZOV and CATHY BENSMIHAN 9179-3786 QUÉBEC INC. ... THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and THE CANADA REVENUE AGENCY   PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec   DATE OF HEARING: May 3, 2022   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LEBLANC J.A.   ... DE MONTIGNY J.A.   DATED: JUNE 17, 2022   APPEARANCES: François Barette Nicolas Simard   For The Appellants   Ian Demers Dominique Castagne Justine Allaire-Rondeau   For The Respondents   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN S.E.N.C.R.L. ...

LASKIN J.A.     Date: 20210723 Dockets: A-158-21 A-160-21 A-161-21 Citation: 2021 FCA 150 CORAM: STRATAS J.A. ... AND DOCKET: A-161-21   STYLE OF CAUSE: CLAUFIELD COOTE v. CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE   MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: LEBLANC J.A.   ... LASKIN J.A.   DATED: July 23, 2021   WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Claufield Coote   The Appellant IN EACH OF THE APPEALS   Jennifer L. ...

RENNIE J.A.   BETWEEN: CONNIE O'BYRNE Appellant And HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Calgary, Alberta, on November 2, 2015. ... REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RYER J.A.   Date: 20151102 Docket: A-472-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 239 CORAM: RYER J.A. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For The Respondent   ...

Phénix, 2001 DTC 5367 (FCA)                                                                                                                                    Date: 20001213                                                                                                                                 Docket: A-667-97 BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant- and- ROBERT PHÉNIX Respondent ASSESSMENT- REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON Assessment Officer [1]         This is an assessment of the respondent's bill of costs pursuant to the judgment rendered on September 12, 2000 dismissing the appeal with costs. [2]         On October 31, 2000, Mr. ... Four units would seem quite reasonable to me in the circumstances. [9]         Finally, Ms. ... Halifax, Nova Scotia December 13, 2000                          François Pilon                       Assessment Officer Certified true translation Suzanne M. ...