Search - 消费者权益保护法di

Further, as stated by Rothstein JA (as he then was) in Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ... R., 2023 FCA 94 at paragraphs 5 and 6. [7] Lau at paragraph 5, Landry at paragraph s 22 and 54, Guibord at paragraph 10 and Bowker at paragraph 27. [8] Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ...

Further, as stated by Rothstein JA (as he then was) in Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ... R., 2023 FCA 94 at paragraphs 5 and 6. [7] Lau at paragraph 5, Landry at paragraph s 22 and 54, Guibord at paragraph 10 and Bowker at paragraph 27. [8] Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ...

The Federal Court of Appeal in Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v Maple Leaf Meats, 2002 FCA 417, [2002] FCJ No. 1504, at paragraph 10, states that an award of costs is not a mere accounting exercise but a matter of judgment as to what is appropriate in the circumstances. ...

It has also been considered in intellectual property litigation: Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma v Maple Leaf Meats Inc., 2002 FCA 417 (Maple Leaf Meats) ...

Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma (2000), 9 C.P.R. (4th) 485 (F.C.T.D.), O'Keefe J. reviewed the jurisprudence on this issue and stated: [...] ...

As Justice Rothstein succinctly put it as long ago as 2002 in the Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v Maple Leaf Meats Inc. decision: An award of party-party costs is not an exercise in exact science. ...

Further, as stated by Rothstein JA (as he then was) in Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ... R., 2023 FCA 94 at paragraphs 5 and 6. [4] Lau at paragraph 5, Landry at paragraph s 22 and 54, Guibord at paragraph 10 and Bowker at paragraph 27. [5] Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. ...

See, for example, Di Modica v. The Queen, 2002 DTC 1290. At other times, this Court has ruled that, in such circumstances, the application was not made as soon as circumstances permitted. ...

[Informal Procedure]); and Di Modica v. R., 2001 CarswellNat 2005 (T.C.C. ...

That principle was explained in Di Modica v. Canada, [2001] T.C.J. No. 620 (Q.L.) at paragraph 16: [16] It is my view that an error by counsel can be a just and equitable reason for granting an extension of time if counsel otherwise exercised the reasonable diligence required of a lawyer. ...