Search - 江苏苏美达轻纺国际贸易有限公司 关税政策 最新动态

& Sons Co. Ltd., [1970] S.C.R. 220 Supreme Court of Canada R. v. J.B. ... & Sons Co. Ltd. (by suggestion) formerly The John Bertram and Sons Co. ... Solicitors for the respondent: Rosenfeld, Schwartz & Brown, Toronto ...

Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1955] S.C.R. 745 Supreme Court of Canada Eli Lilly & Co. ... Ford & Co. Ltd. v. Commssr. of Inland Revenue, 12 T.C., 997 at 1004, applied. ... CR. 269. 2   [1953] Ex. CR. 269. 3   (1932) 16 T.C. 570. 4   (1926) 12 T.C. 997. 5   12 T.C. 768. 6   12 T.C. 927. 7   (1951) 32 T.C. 133 at 155. 8   (1939) 63 C.L.R. 382. 9   (1930) 16 T.C. 570. 1 0  (1932) 16 T.C. 570. ...

Attorney General of Canada / Re Claim, under s. 1036 of the Criminal Code, to certain fines, [1937] S.C.R. 403 Supreme Court of Canada Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. ... The matter is now referred to us under section 43 of the Supreme Court Act, in view of the fact that, by section 6 of chapter 226 of the Revised Statutes of Nova Scotia, 1923, the opinion of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia upon the reference, although advisory only, is, for all purposes of appeal to this Court, to “ be treated as a final judgment of the court between parties.” ... It is contended by the Attorney-General of Canada that they were “ imposed in respect of the breach of any of the revenue laws of Canada,” and that they were “imposed * * * in a proceeding instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada or of a department thereof in which that Government bore the cost of prosecution.” ...

Spruce Falls Power & Paper Co., [1953] 2 S.C.R. 407 Date: 1953-10-06 The Minister of National Revenue (Respondent) Appellant; and Spruce Falls Power & Paper Company Limited (Appellant) Respondent. ... Roderick Johnston, Q.C. and Terence Sheard, Q.C. for Spruce Falls Power & Paper Co. ... Solicitors for Spruce Falls Power & Paper Co. Ltd., respondent: Johnston, Sheard & Johnston. ...

It was held that the assessment in question was on Sifton ‘s income for 1924 and that by various enactments referred to, the municipality was prohibited from attempting to exercise jurisdiction outside the municipality and was exceeding its powers to " " levy on the whole rateable property within the municipality.’’ ... It is, I think, incontrovertible that neither plant nor equipment is, in such sense, " " paid for ‘ ‘ by the Crown. ... It is for determining " " all matters brought before the Commission’’ that the jurisdiction is declared, but those matters are such as come by way of appeal, and I see nothing in the section which introduces a new and original authority to deal with those matters in other than. the administrative manner in which they have already been dealt with: I see nothing intended to confer a purely judicial function dealing with civil rights. ...

Cohen and $. J. Cohen were brothers and Leshgold their brother-in-law and that J. ... In support of this contention, the cases on the construction of the words 4 relatives ” or relations ’ ’ in matters involving the interpretation of wills such as Ross v. ... :—There are here two appeals, one by Army & Navy Department Store Limited, an Alberta company (hereinafter referred to as the Alberta Corporation) and the Army & Navy Dept. ...

Richard, for the responend MacMillan & Bloedel (Alberni) Ltd. J. B. ... Solicitors for the respondent, MacMillan & Bloedel (Alberni) Ltd.: Gowling, MacTavish, Osborne & Henderson, Ottawa. Solicitors for the respondent, Ontario-Minnesota Pulp & Paper Ltd.: Fraser, Beatty, Tucker, Mclntosh & Stewart, Toronto. ...

Canadian Industrial Gas & Oil Ltd. v. Government of Saskatchewan et al., 80 DLR (3d) 449, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 545 Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Industrial Gas & Oil Ltd. v. ... The concept originated with Holmes J. in Swift & Co. v. United States [40]. It was applied in Stafford & Wallace [41] and in Chicago Board of Trade v. ...

James Richardson & Sons v. M.N.R., 84 DTC 6325, [1984] CTC 345, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 614 Supreme Court of Canada James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. ... Is Section 231(3) of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72 C. 63 as amended, intra vires the Parliament of Canada under the provisions of Section 91(3)   of the Constitution Act, 1867  ? ...   [1] The Chief Justice took no part in the judgment. ...

Minister of Customs & Excise, [1928] S.C.R. 54 Supreme Court of Canada Bradshaw v. Minister of Customs & Excise, [1928] S.C.R. 54 Date: 1927-12-10 Arthur Bradshaw (Defendant) Appellant; and Minister Of Customs And Excise (Plaintiff) Respondent. 1927: October 12 Present: Duff, Newcombe, Rinfret, Lamont and Smith JJ. ... Solicitors for the appellant: Dickie & De Beck. Solicitors for the respondent: Congdon, Campbell & Meredith. [1] (1927) 38 B.C. ...