Search - 水晶光电 行业地位 发展趋势
Results 41 - 50 of 2996 for 水晶光电 行业地位 发展趋势
News of Note post
10 November 2020- 10:55pm MDA Systems – Court of Quebec finds payments made by the federal government under a contract where it mostly had the risks and benefits were SR&ED “contract payments” Email this Content MDA contracted with the Government of Canada to provide computer systems engineering work on a satellite system to perform radar imaging from space. The ARQ denied tax credits for the wages cost of work performed on the contracts by MDA on the basis that the consideration received by MDA from the Government was “contract payments” – whose definition (similarly to the federal definition in ITA s. 127(9)) relevantly referred to “an amount in respect of an expenditure of a current nature … of a taxpayer … payable by the Government of Canada … or other public authority … for scientific research and experimental development to be performed for the authority.” Before agreeing with the ARQ position, Bourgeois JCQ found that: “the SR&ED work was carried out because of the requirements in the contracts between the Government of Canada and MDA” “the Government of Canada bore the major risks of the … Program” “the intellectual property developed by MDA in the space component of this project was transferred from MDA to the Government of Canada” it was a contract for services rather than for the sale of goods (although Bourgeois JCQ agreed with a CRA Policy Statement that “a contract for the sale of a good does not necessarily mean that the SR&ED work was not being performed on behalf of the payer”) More generally, “[a]lthough the contracts were not drafted specifically for doing SR&ED work, analysis of the contract terms tends to show that ultimately the SR&ED work was undertaken on behalf of the Government of Canada.” ...
News of Note post
20 June 2022- 11:30pm Marino – Federal Court of Appeal confirms the Oceanspan principle that a non-resident who does not compute income from any source for ITA purposes does not have a taxation year Email this Content An individual with no connection to Canada paid significant tuition fees while in attendance at U.S. universities prior to 2012 then, on immigrating to Canada, claimed his “unused” tuition tax credits as a deduction from Canadian tax. ... In the Court of Appeal, Stratas JA stated (at para. 3) that “ Oceanspan is … directly on point … [and] binds us, just as it bound the Tax Court,” and further rejected the taxpayer’s argument- that s. 250.1 supersedes Oceanspan and has the effect of deeming every non-resident person to have a taxation year in Canada – and expressed agreement here as well with the Tax Court’s reasons. ... Canada, 2022 FCA 115 under s. 248(1) – taxation year, and s. 250.1(a). ...
News of Note post
10 September 2025- 12:42am Angus – Tax Court finds that the taxpayer’s move was made for personal reasons, so that his moving expenses were non-deductible Email this Content Spiro, J. admitted into evidence an email sent by the taxpayer which effectively indicated that his primary reason for moving his residence from Vancouver to Salt Spring Island was personal (i.e., upset of his partner regarding arson attempts next to their Vancouver home), rather than to be closer to work on Vancouver Island. ... The King, 2025 TCC 121 under s. 248(1) – eligible relocation – (a)(i), and General Concepts – Evidence. ...
News of Note post
Gagné JCA stated: First, the ordinary meaning of the words "rights of the secured creditor …" refers to all the economic rights of the secured creditor securing the obligation. There is nothing in the text of [Reg.] 2201(2)(a) … to limit these rights to the real property rights of the secured creditor [as argued by the Caissse]. … Second, the legislator was careful to add "including guarantees …” … The word "guarantees" must be taken in its broad sense, which includes suretyship. … Third, the [Finance] Explanatory Notes to the Regulations support this interpretation. … In rejecting a further argument of the Caisse that the Reg. was contrary to “the rule prohibiting the granting of pure discretion by Regulation,” she stated that the Reg. was not purely discretionary and, in fact, its meaning “can easily be determined by applying the modern method of interpretation.” ... Caisse Desjardins de Limoilou, 2020 QCCA 1612 under Reg. 2201(2)(a) and Statutory Interpretation – Regulations/Statutory Delegation. ...
News of Note post
10 June 2024- 11:50pm Burlington Loan Management – Upper Tribunal finds that Irishco’s purchasing a UK interest claim from Caymansco at a tax arbitrage price did not have Treaty-reduction as a main purpose Email this Content BLM was a substantial Irish-resident investment company, which had been acquiring proved claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE" – a UK resident) since 2011. ... HMRC denied BLM’s refund claim on the basis of Art. 12(5) of that Treaty, which excluded the application of Art. 12 “if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the … assignment … to take advantage of … Article [12].” ... Summary of Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC [2024] UKUT 152 under Treaties – Income Tax Conventions – Art. 12. ...
News of Note post
The facts are somewhat analogous to those in Global Cash Access, where Global was charged for something analogous to cheque-cashing services by the casino in fee amounts ranging from 12.5% down to 2.5%, depending on the size of the individual amounts – with Sharlow JA finding that these were for exempt encashment services. One distinction might be that it would have been less consonant with the “economic realities” (to use a phrase of Richards LJ) to characterize these amount as being paid by Global for access to the casino – and another, that the amounts were high, but not outrageous, when viewed as consideration only for encashing. ... Summary of Wiltonpark Ltd & Ors v Revenue & Customs Commissioners, [2016] EWCA Civ 1294 under ETA s. 123(1) – financial service – para. ...
News of Note post
12 February 2025- 11:39pm RBC – UK Supreme Court finds that an oil and gas royalty was too remote from a land interest in the oil field to be immovable property under the Canada-U.K. ... Sulpetro has the latter but not the former. … Lady Rose went on to find that even If the rights of the royalty payer (now, BP) had amounted to a right to work the field, nonetheless RBC's right to royalty payments from BP did not amount to a right to "consideration for" such right to work. ... Summaries of Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2025] UKSC 2 under Treaties – Income Tax Conventions – Art. 6, Art. 12, General Concepts – Separate Existence, and ETA s. 217 – imported taxable supply- (c). ...
News of Note post
2 December 2019- 9:55am Zong – Tax Court of Canada finds that mandatory contributions by a dual resident to the UK’s national insurance scheme did not qualify for FTC purposes Email this Content A resident of both Canada and the UK who was employed full-time in the UK for several years was not entitled to claim a foreign tax credit under s. 126(1) for mandatory contributions that he made in 2016 to the UK’s national insurance scheme, on the basis that such contributions were not foreign income “taxes”. ... The Queen, 2019 TCC 270 under s. 126(7) – non-business-income tax and Treaties – Income Tax Conventions – Art. 24. ...
News of Note post
13 November 2018- 12:31am Iberville Developments – Quebec Court of Appeal finds that it is abusive to use rollover provisions to avoid rather than defer tax Email this Content Three affiliated Quebec corporations avoided (or so they thought) most of the Quebec tax on the sale of Quebec real estate at a gain of around $800M (including some recapture) by using a “Quebec year-end shuffle.” ... Agence du Revenu du Québec, Quebec Court of Appeal No. 500-09-026184-168 (November 12, 2018) under s. 245(4), s. 9 – capital gain v. profit – real estate and s. 18(1)(b) – capital expenditure v. expense – improvements v. running expenses. ...
News of Note post
21 September 2021- 11:51pm Paletta International – Federal Court of Appeal finds that there is no requirement for the Crown to explicitly plead “sham” Email this Content Hogan J had found that a tax shelter partnership, which had funded the prints and advertising expenses for films that it had purchased from Twentieth Century Fox, had not incurred such expenses for an income-producing purpose because there was no real prospect that Fox would not exercise its “options” to repurchase the films – and thus no real prospect that the films would generate revenue to the partnership. ... Canada, 2021 FCA 182 under General Concepts – Sham and s. 9 – capital gain v. profit – real estate. ...