Search - 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话

., Volume 37, London: Butterworth & Co. Ltd., 1982 at page 318 states that, On the other hand, it is not permissible, on an application to strike out the statement of claim, to try the action on affidavits when the facts and issues are in dispute in order to see whether the plaintiff really has a cause of action. ...

Subsection 56(12) reads: 56(12) Subject to subsections 56.1(2) and 60.1(2), for the purposes of paragraphs (1)(b), (c) and (c.1) (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the “former paragraphs”) and 60(b), (c) and (c.1) (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the "latter paragraphs"), “ allowance” does not include any amount that is received by a person, referred to in the former paragraphs as “the taxpayer" and in the latter paragraphs as“ "the recipient", unless that person has discretion as to the use of the amount. ...

.: — It was agreed at the commencement of the hearing that these cases would proceed on common evidence. ...

Ouellette & Brett (supra). Later, he concluded as follows at page 2054 (D.T.C. 354): Accordingly, I find that the point at issue, as in In re Spiral et al. v. ...

The difference was explained in the following terms: [TRANSLATION] Q. [...] ...

., in conformity with Stubart, was careful to qualify the importance of a bona fide business purpose by stating that, although it "... is not determinative of the artificiality of the deduction”, it “is certainly relevant”. ...

. … The words “prevent” and “prévenir” mean the same: to stop an event from happening before it happens. ...

Robertson J.A. categorized the reported cases into two categories: those that deal with “inside directors” and those that deal with “outside directors” At page 263 (5416-17), he states: [...] it is difficult to deny that inside directors, meaning those involved in the day-to-day management of the company and who influence the conduct of its business affairs, will have the most difficulty in establishing the due diligence defence. ...

The appellant produced cases, uncontested by the respondent, which have held interest expense to be deductible where the interest expense exceeds the income from property (Alberta & Southern Gas Co. v. ...

("Allarco '); and (c) 840 owned all of the issued shares of 348841 Alberta Ltd. ...