Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Results 571 - 580 of 13528 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC
1010034 Ontario Limited v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 123
In all other respects the motion is dismissed. There will be no costs on the motion. ... Margeson” Margeson J. Citation: 2009TCC123 Date: 20090303 Docket: 2006-3768(GST)G BETWEEN: 1010034 ONTARIO LIMITED, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent, Docket: 2006-3769(GST)G AND BETWEEN: 4059654 CANADA LIMITED, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... [8] The motion in that regard is dismissed. [9] Both parties have been somewhat successful so there will be no costs on the motions. ...
TCC
Manoli v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 136
The Queen, 2010 TCC 136 Docket: 2008-1554(GST)G BETWEEN: SOHEIL MANOLI, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on January 18, 2010, at Montréal, Québec. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 5th day of March 2010. "Robert J. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 5th day of March 2010. "Robert J. ...
TCC
MacAdam v. The Queen, 2006 TCC 254
The total unreported income as assessed by the Minister is detailed as follows: Description 1989 1990 1991 GCI Inc.- s.15(1) appropriation $46,667 $79,999 $ 79,999 Ottawa Sun- s.15(1) appropriation $ 0 $ 2,500 $ 22,000 Pierre Bourque & Sons Ltd.- s.15(1) appropriation $ 0 $ 0 $250,000 Less: Balance in Birkenhead Account on Dec. 31 st $ 0 ($6,444) ($183,330) Less: Travel Expenses ($7,164) $ 0 $ 0 Total s.15(1) Shareholder Appropriations $39,503 $76,056 $168,670 T4 and T4A Income $ 92,319 $ 0 $ 0 T5 Income $ 1,684 $ 1,905 $ 781 Total Unreported Income $133,506 $ 77,961 $169,451 [3] By Notices of Objection filed effective November 17, 1994, the Appellant objected to the assessment of his tax liability for the 1989, 1990 and 1991 taxation years and reassigned for review on February 17, 2003. ... CITATION: 2006TCC254 COURT FILE NO.: 2004-257(IT)G STYLE OF CAUSE: PATRICK MACADAM AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 19, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The Honourable Keith Flanigan, Deputy Judge DATE OF JUDGMENT: May 5, 2006 APPEARANCES: For the Appellant: The Appellant himself Counsel for the Respondent: Ifeanyichukwu Nwachukwu COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: Firm: For the Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada ...
TCC
Emond v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 142 (Informal Procedure)
The Queen, 2011 TCC 142 (Informal Procedure) Docket: 2010-285(IT)I BETWEEN: JEAN-MICHEL EMOND, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... The table below shows the amounts claimed by the appellant and the amounts the deduction of which was disallowed by the Minister: 2004 2005 Claimed Disallowed Claimed Disallowed Motor vehicle expenses 12,249 6,853 Legal and accounting fees 100 Meal and drink expenses 1,205 1,402 Parking expenses 235 Loan payment 4,516 4,516 Hotel 437 Flight 757 Vehicle rental 285 Cell phone 1,410 Telephone 631 Passport, visa and insurance 1,800 1,800 Interest fees 1,407 1,406 Miscellaneous 273 Office expenses 2,000 Travel expenses 7,830 Home office expenses 934 Non-taxable allowances received 5,370 4,260 TOTAL 26,242 19,445 11,232 4,260 [4] The Minister disallowed the deduction of $6,853 in motor vehicle expenses for 2004 on the basis that the appellant used his vehicle for business purposes only 45% of the total time he used his vehicle, not 90% of the time as the appellant claimed. ... "B.Paris" Paris J. Translation certified true on this 31st day of October 2012 Margarita Gorbounova, Translator CITATION: 2011 TCC 142 COURT FILE NO.: 2010-285(IT)I STYLE OF CAUSE: JEAN-MICHEL EMOND and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: November 26, 2010 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The Honourable Justice Brent Paris DATE OF JUDGMENT: March 10, 2011 APPEARANCES: For the appellant: The appellant himself Counsel for the respondent: Gregoire Cadieux COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the appellant: Name: N/A. ...
TCC
Bousquet v. The Queen, docket 96-4187(IT)I (Informal Procedure)
Appeal heard on May 5, 1998, at Montréal, Quebec, by The Honourable Judge Guy Tremblay Appearances For the Appellant: The Appellant herself Counsel for the Respondent: Mounes Ayadi JUDGMENT The appeal from the assessment made under the Income Tax Act with respect to the 1993 taxation year is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment. ... They read as follows: [translation] 3. In drawing up the July 20, 1995 Notice of Child Tax Benefit, the Minister of National Revenue (''the Minister'') assumed in particular the following facts: (a) the children for whom the appellant received the child tax benefit for the months from July 1994 to June 1995 were Marylee and Kelly; [admitted] (b) for the 1993 taxation year, the Minister revised the net income of Guy Plante, the appellant's spouse, from $3,754 to $42,512; [admitted] (c) for the 1993 taxation year, the appellant's net income was $25,671; [admitted] (d) for the months from July 1994 to June 1995, with 1993 as the base year, the appellant received a total of $2,491.58 in child tax benefits for her children Marylee and Kelly, paid monthly as follows: 1994/1995 July 1994 $ 203.19 August 203.01 September 203.01 October 264.05 November 217.38 December 217.38 January 1995 217.38 February 217.38 March 217.38 April 217.38 May 217.38 June 96.66 Total $ 2,491.58 [admitted] (e) the Minister adjusted the child tax benefit for the 1993 base year, as in his view the appellant was entitled to $185.50 for the months from July 1994 to June 1995 (approximately $15.15 per month); [admitted] (f) the balance owing to the Minister on July 20, 1995 was therefore as follows: Amount received $2,491.58 Less: Revised amount of child tax benefit (base year 1993) 185.50 Subtotal 2,306,08 Less: Amount transferred from 1994 child tax benefit 24.76 Balance owing, July 20, 1995 $ 2,281.32 [admitted] 4. ... In drawing up the July 14, 1995 Notice of Redetermination of the GST credit, the Minister assumed in particular the following facts: (a) for the 1993 taxation year, the appellant received a total of $608 in GST credits ($152 in each of July 1994, October 1994, January 1995, and April 1995); [admitted] (b) for the 1993 taxation year, the appellant's net income was $25,671; [admitted] (c) for the 1993 taxation year, the Minister revised the net income of Guy Plante, the appellant's spouse, from $3,754 to $42,512; [admitted] (d) because the net family income exceeded $38,080, the Minister therefore revised the GST credits for the 1993 taxation year to zero; [admitted] (e) the balance owing to the Minister on July 14, 1995 was accordingly as follows: 1994/1995 Amount received $608.00 Less: Revised amount 0 Balance owing to the Minister $ 608.00 [admitted] [6] In her testimony, the appellant maintained that, during a telephone conversation with one Ms. ...
TCC
Cantore v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 367
The Queen, 2010 TCC 367 Docket: 2007-3451(IT)G BETWEEN: VICTOR CANTORE, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Hogan" Hogan J. Citation: 2010 TCC 367 Date: 20100714 Docket: 2007-3451(IT)G BETWEEN: VICTOR CANTORE, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Chouinard ($6,000.00) Loan — N. Brenhouse ($15,000.00) Loan — C. ...
TCC
Allan v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1072 [at at 390], 2013 TCC 65
The Queen, 2013 DTC 1072 [at at 390], 2013 TCC 65 Citation: 2013 TCC 65 Date: 2013 0614 Docket: 2009-3477(IT)G BETWEEN: RICHARD ALLAN, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... The Respondent shall be entitled to costs. This Amended Reasons for Judgment is issued in substitution of the Reasons for Judgment dated February 22, 2013. ... Farant Firm: For the Respondent: William F. ...
TCC
Bouchard v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1203 [at at 1083], 2013 TCC 247 (Informal Procedure)
Masse" Masse D.J. Citation: 2013 TCC 247 Date: 20130807 Docket: 2011-538(IT)I BETWEEN: MICHEL BOUCHARD, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... [23] For all of the foregoing reasons, this appeal is dismissed. ... Masse, Deputy Judge DATE OF JUDGMENT: August 7, 2013 APPEARANCES: For the Appellant: The Appellant himself Counsel for the Respondent: Valerie Messore COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: Firm: For the Respondent: William F. ...
TCC
Waugh v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 494
Little Appearances: Counsel for the Appellant: J. Herbert Rosner Counsel for the Respondent: Karen A. ... Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 24th day of August 2007. ... Little” Little J. Citation: 2007TCC494 Date: 20070824 Docket: 2005-438(IT)G BETWEEN: JENNIFER WAUGH, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ...
TCC
Lizotte v. M.N.R., 2003 TCC 539
., 2003 TCC 539 [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Docket: 2001-2354(EI) BETWEEN: BENOÎT LIZOTTE, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 12th day of August 2003. "J.F. Somers" D.J.T.C.C. [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] Citation: 2003TCC539 Date: 20030812 Docket: 2001-2354(EI) BETWEEN: BENOÎT LIZOTTE, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent. ...