Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

., 2005 TCC 537       Docket: 2004-574(CPP) BETWEEN: DONALD BERGER o/a BUSY 'B' CONSTRUCTION & CONCRETE,   Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.     ... Signed at Regina, Saskatchewan, this 26 th day of August, 2005.         ...

The Queen, 2008 TCC 121 (Informal Procedure)       Docket: 2007-2584(IT)I BETWEEN: LANDMARK AUTO SALES LTD., Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.     ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 28th day of February, 2008.         "G. ...   [21]     For these reasons, the appeal must be dismissed.            ...

The Queen, 2008 TCC 366 (Informal Procedure)         Docket: 2007-4615(GST)I BETWEEN: CLAUDE RICARD, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 26th day of June 2008.     "Alain Tardif" Tardif J.   ... Susan Deichert, Reviser         Citation: 2008 TCC 366 Date: 20080626 Docket: 2007-4615(GST)I BETWEEN:   CLAUDE RICARD, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.   ...

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 14th day of December, 2009.     “E.A. Bowie” Bowie J.           ... Papp had no professional income or expenses in either year, and that his income was:     2003 2004   Employment income from Fan $32,000 $6,600 Employment income from Incentive Depot Inc.     1,307 Income from RRSP and dividends 371 4,153   Total $32,371 $12,060   [4]      Exhibit A-3 is a summary prepared by Mr. ... Bowie     DATE OF JUDGMENT:                    December 14, 2009   APPEARANCES:   For the Appellant: The Appellant himself Counsel for the Respondent: Natasha Reid   COUNSEL OF RECORD:          For the Appellant:                             Name:                      N/A                               Firm:                     N/A          For the Respondent:                    John H. ...

This paragraph reads as follows:                    [TRANSLATION] 5.          ... DEC. 643.50 637.00 539.50 578.50 526.50 * 731.50 520.00 520.00 650.00 520.00 520.00 598.00 572.00 565.50 598.00 731.50 √ 572.00 585.00 572.00 520.00 √ √ 434.72 + 114.66 3533-3947 3954 3963 3979 3992 4008 4053-4064-4037 4077 4088 4121 4147 4161 4175 4192 4207 4227 4242 4261 02-04-95 02-18-95 02-19-95 03-04-95 03-18-95 04-01-95 04-15-95 05-13-95 05-27-95 05-01-95 06-10-95 06-24-95 08-05-95 09-02-95 09-16-95 09-30-95 10-14-95 10-28-95 11-11-95 11-25-95 12-09-95 TOTAL 1,676.22 1,209.00 1,105.00 1,291.16 1,258.00 731.50 1,092.00 1,105.00 1,222.00 1,040.00 520.00 $12,977.88 *         LOST STUB                                                    GROSS TOTAL                        $12,977.88 +        BONUS                                                           TOTAL IN DEC ...                     $15,317.38 √           NOT WORKED                                          DIFF ...

The Queen, 2007 TCC 468 Court File No. 2005-2022 (GST)G                                                    TAX COURT OF CANADA                                                      IN RE:   Income Tax Act                                          BETWEEN:                                  B.E.S.T. ... Appellant                                                                     - and-                                                   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                                                               Respondent   [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION]     Decision and Reasons given by Paris J. Courts Administration Service, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario Wednesday, April 4, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.                                                          ...

MARTIN, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT   Angers J ... The breakdown is as follows:   Taxation Year Federal Taxes   $ Provincial Taxes   $ CPP     $ EI     $ Penalties & Interest $ Total     $   2001   66,287.95   34,255.89   26,617.16   20,756.90   136,679.21   284.597.11   [19]         The details of the assessment issued to Codiac with regard to its failure to remit an amount of net tax, for which the appellant was assessed, is detailed as follows in the respondent's Reply to the Notice of Appeal (2009‑3419(GST)G):   Period End Date [Unremitted Net] Tax Interest Penalty Total   2001-03-31   —   $  5,501.75   $ 6,784.90   $ 12,286.65 2001-06-30 $ 81,940.30 $ 42,846.00 $36,157.63 $160,943.93 2001-09-30 $ 26,173.48 $ 11,142.19 $ 8,317.95 $ 45,633.62 2001-12-31 $105,623.89 $ 61,512.06 $13,858.90 $180,994.85 TOTAL: $213,737.67 $121,002.00 $65,119.38 $399,859.05   [20]         Codiac had been assessed for GST/HST for the period from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003. ... Each party will bear its own costs.     Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 27th day of August 2012.         ...

Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 30 th day of November 2009.       ... Little” Little J.         Citation:  2009 TCC 10 Date: 2009 1130 Docket: 2006-215(IT)G   BETWEEN: CHRISTINE RABY, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.   AMENDED REASONS FOR JUDGMENT   Little J.     A.                FACTS   [1]      Aapex Driving Academy Ltd. ...

MACDONALD, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT     Hershfield J.   ... R., [37] as follows:             1.       Was there a tax benefit?   2.       ... SCHEDULE 1                       CITATION:                                       2012 TCC 123   COURT FILE NO.:                            2009-1(IT)G   STYLE OF CAUSE:                          DR. ...

Signed at Calgary, Alberta, this 21st day of October 2002.           "Michael H. ... Porter" D.J.T.C.C.         2000-3667(EI)   BETWEEN:   BETH MCMORRAN O/A MCMORRAN & ASSOCIATES,   Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,   Respondent, and   PAULINE BAKKEN, Intervenor.   ... SCOTT, ANNE SEVERSEN, ANN SHAW, THEREZA SLOAN, MICHELLE SMITH, E.             ...