Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Results 13181 - 13190 of 13525 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC

Stanley Drug Products Ltd. v. MNR, 90 DTC 1664, [1990] 2 CTC 2646 (TCC)

This reasoning was followed by the House of Lords in the case of FA & AB Ltd. v. ...
TCC

ELB Productions Ltd. v. MNR, 91 DTC 1466, [1991] 2 CTC 2661 (TCC)

The Dun & Bradstreet report on WGL indicated that it was incorporated in September 1984, and commenced business in October 1984. ...
TCC

Gordon v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1554, [1996] 3 CTC 2229 (TCC)

.: This is an appeal from a Notice of Reassessment wherein the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) reassessed the Appellant’s tax payable for the 1990 taxation year. ...
TCC

Beutler v. MNR, 88 DTC 1286, [1988] 1 CTC 2414 (TCC)

The facts in this case, it was said, are different from the reported cases of Lloyd Youngman & Company Inc., Trustee of the Estate of Harold Fraser in Bankruptcy v. ...
TCC

Ingram v. MNR, 91 DTC 939, [1991] 2 CTC 2259 (TCC)

However, the Robert & Collins French-English Dictionary, 2d edition, 1988 interprets "interdit" as "forbidden" or "prohibited" and does not interpret that word to mean "capacity". ...
TCC

163410 Canada Inc. v. The Queen, docket 97-1752-GST-G

Second, and this point is even more important, the firm agreed to establish its fees [TRANSLATION] "in the same way as if 163410 were a regular client... and as if they had to be paid... by MIDLAND ". [9] The appellant's funds were thus used by Midland to pay Heenan Blaikie's fees, as is evidenced by the document entitled [TRANSLATION] "Statement of Account" in Exhibit A-10. [10] I consider that the agreement of May 12, 1992 between Midland and the appellant, to which Heenan Blaikie was also implicitly a party by reason of its undertakings (as clearly set out in paragraph 4 of the agreement), concerns the supply of legal services and alters the initial agreement between Midland and Heenan Blaikie in this regard. [11] In my opinion paragraph 4 of this agreement of May 12, 1992 is thus an agreement for a supply of legal services under which the appellant, not Midland, is designated as the person who is liable to pay the consideration for the supply. ...
TCC

Mirza v. The Queen, docket 96-3385-IT-G

The appellant said Atlantic was purchased “... to build a portfolio of rental properties so that we could keep them for long and then some day we can sell”. ...
TCC

Gray v. The Queen, docket 96-1888-IT-G

Gray has repaid all the loans and associated interest to me on the following basis: 1986 CAD 2’000.00 1987 CAD 15’000.00 + USD 10’000.00 1988 CAD 354’500.00 1989 CAD 157’500.00 1991 CAD 22’500.00 1992 CAD 468’750.00 6. ...
TCC

McRae v. The Queen, docket 97-891-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

Bonner" J.T.C.C. [1]               R.S. 1985 c. I-5 ...
TCC

Olson Realty Corp. v. The Queen, docket 96-4661-GST-I (Informal Procedure)

The Appellant cannot succeed on this primary issue subject to what is stated in the following paragraph. [14] The Appellant reviewed Exhibit A-4 in oral testimony and identified the following agents from whom part or all of the 7% amounts had been recovered and remitted to Revenue Canada: Agent Amount Remitted Richard Arneson $ 34.13 Pat Berner 1,675.54 Thomas Jordens 46.69 Joan Demyen 140.63 Alma Lessard 1,406.85 Lynn Scott 532.46 Jim Griffith 150.00 Marla Lewis 332.02 Deiter Westphal 577.71 The amounts in the above table may not have been verified by Revenue Canada but I understand that Revenue Canada acknowledges that a portion of the $12,767.62 total has been remitted. ...

Pages