Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

In accordance with [Reg.] 4901(1) … a prescribed investment for a registered investment … is a qualified investment for … a registered retirement savings plan ("RRSP"), registered retirement income fund ("RRIF") and deferred profit sharing plan ("DPSP"), respectively. The kinds of property that are qualified investments for an RRSP, RRIF or a DPSP are described in … [ss.] 146(1), 146.3(1) and section 204 … [and Reg.] 4900 …. ... In addition [see] paragraph 21 of … IT-320R3 …. ...

In accordance with [Reg.] 4901(1) … a prescribed investment for a registered investment … is a qualified investment for … a registered retirement savings plan ("RRSP"), registered retirement income fund ("RRIF") and deferred profit sharing plan ("DPSP"), respectively. The kinds of property that are qualified investments for an RRSP, RRIF or a DPSP are described in … [ss.] 146(1), 146.3(1) and section 204 … [and Reg.] 4900 …. ... In addition [see] paragraph 21 of … IT-320R3 …. ...

. … Finally … Ahmad … held that pre-judgment interest was not taxable because no amount was owed to the taxpayer before the judgment was rendered. ...

29 August 2023 CPAC Roundtable Q. 8, 2023-0983051C6- Automobile Expenses-- summary under Paragraph 8(1)(h.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 8- Subsection 8(1)- Paragraph 8(1)(h.1) Gardner (re deducting a sales person’s expenses of occasional travel between her home office and her employer) will be followed only on similar facts Regarding the deductibility of automobile expense incurred by an employee, with a fully remote work arrangement, in connection with an occasional visit to the office from the home office, CRA stated: [T]raveling between an employee’s home, including a home office, and a regular place of employment (RPE) is generally considered personal travel …. … In this case, “regular” means there is some degree of frequency or repetition in the employee’s reporting to that particular location in a given pay period, month, or year. … For example, a work location may be considered to be a RPE of an employee even though the employee may only report to work at that particular location on a periodic basis (e.g., once or twice a month) during the year. Depending on the circumstances, an employee may have more than one RPE. … … [Although] Gardner … held that motor vehicle expenses related to an employee’s travel between their home office and the employer’s principal place of business were deductible employment expenses under paragraph 8(1)(h.1) … the CRA’s general position on travel between an employee’s home or home office and a location that is a RPE for that employee remains unchanged. ...

The Directorate stated: [B]ased on the terms of the Payment Agreements … Canco agrees to make advanced payments to NR that are set off or deducted from the amount due by Canco to NR required under the Initial Contract. ... As such, the nature of the payments is different from [those] … in … 2008-29716 …. ... Accordingly … the advance payments made by Canco to NR under the Payment Agreements are subject to the withholding requirements of section 105 …. ...

Furthermore, where the corporation is the beneficiary of a policy acquired to finance a share purchase/redemption under a shareholders' agreement … the premiums are not made or incurred for the purpose of earning business income as required by paragraph 18(1)(a) or paragraph 18(1)(h). ... If a critical illness policy were used as collateral for a corporate loan, the premiums would also be non-deductible …. Antoine Guertin …. … Premiums paid by the corporation for the rider to the policy allowing it to obtain a premium refund amount if the shareholder does not have one of the covered illnesses or medical conditions after 10 years are not deductible on the basis of the application of paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(h). ...

Consequently, in a situation where a corporation can demonstrate that life insurance proceeds that were paid directly to a financial institution have reduced its debt to the financial institution, the life insurance proceeds will be considered as "received" by that corporation for the purpose of applying subparagraph (d)(ii) of the definition of CDA …. In addition, comments in paragraph 6 of … IT-430R3 … will be modified …. ...

Can the minor child be considered, in these Scenarios, to have sole beneficial interest in the amounts payable under the annuity as required by s. 60(l)(ii)(B) as it was proposed to be amended [which stipulated that the annuity be one "under which the taxpayer, or a trust under which the taxpayer is the sole person beneficially interested in amounts payable under the annuity, is the annuitant …"]? CRA responded: February 27, 2004 … Legislative Proposals … indicate … that the child will be able to benefit from the provisions of paragraph 60(l) as long as the child is the only beneficiary of the trust, before the child’s death, who has an interest in the amounts payable under the annuity. Nowhere in the Act is the expression "amounts payable under the annuity" defined. … Pratte J.A. in Bensol Customs Brokers … explain[ed] the scope of the word “under”: "A claim is made under a statute, in my view, when that statute is the law which, assuming the claim to be well founded, would be the source of the plaintiff's right". … Under this analysis, therefore, the annuity must be the source of the beneficiary's right to collect. … [I]t is our view that the annuities described in these Scenarios would be annuities described in clause 60(l)(ii)(B) to the extent that the Legislative Proposals are adopted. ...

Repairs or Running Expense expenditure on Canadian film production can be current expense if it is only of short-term use Is whether an expenditure on a "Canadian film or video production” ("CFVP") is a current expense, or a capital expenditure on depreciable property, determined in accordance with the criteria set out in 9722707, which states: Generally, the cost of preparing a tape will normally be considered a current expenditure where the tape is only of short-term use, either because it is merely of current topical interest or because it is intended to be shown only once (…) In these latter situations, the material is normally retained on the tape for record purposes only. ... CRA responded: The criteria set out in that paragraph may still be used …. … In addition … a likelihood of a particular production generating revenues other than those provided for in the original broadcast contract, for example, from the sale of DVDs, the awarding of contracts for broadcasting on the Internet, on specialty channels or in territories not covered by the original broadcast contract, can also be taken into consideration in determining whether the costs related to a production should be considered as capital expenditures in respect of depreciable property. … [W]here the broadcast contract covers a period of several years, under which the broadcaster has the right to broadcast the production several times during that period, this would be an argument to support that the costs associated with the production provide a lasting benefit to the producer. ...

" While IT-283R2 has been archived … the above statement … is still valid. … In regard to the CCA class, paragraph 8 of IT-472 [states]: " … The Department considers the following property to be so included in Class 8:... ...