Search - 德国民法典第1993条

.), [1993] R.J.Q. 625, at page 633, Delisle J., writing for the majority of the Court of Appeal of Quebec, after noting the now famous words of De Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. ...

(March 22, 1993), IMM-1008-93; Boda v. M.E.I. (1992), 56 F.T.R. 106; Mobley c. ...

Canada (Solicitor General) (1992), 53 F.T.R. 147 aff. by (1993), 154 N.R. 319 (FCA), Barry Strayer J. explained the decision-making process as follows:  […] these exemptions require two decisions by the head of an institution: first, a factual determination as to whether the material comes within the description of material potentially subject to being withheld from disclosure; and second, a discretionary decision as to whether that material should nevertheless be disclosed ...

The applicant’s first request was dated June 30, 2003 and therefore the Minister’s delegate could not have refunded taxes paid before taxation year 1993. ...

-L.C. (1993), 101 D.L.R. (4th) 345 (Que. C.A.) a husband brought a motion for recusal of the presiding judge on the grounds of reasonable apprehension of bias. ...

., [1993] F.C.J. No. 986; Kaiser v. The Minister of National Revenue, [1995] F.C.J. ...

The Appellant would determine the amount of money he advanced to the Company in its 12-month fiscal period ending in a particular year, for example 1992, and when he filed his income tax return for 1992 in the spring of 1993, he would claim 75% of that amount as an allowable business investment loss. ...

She stated in the hearing that she is a housewife and plays piano as a volunteer, which is consistent with the submitted income tax returns. [12]             The citizenship judge stated that he applied the residency test set out in Pourghasemi (Re), [1993] FCJ No 232 (TD). ...

The neighbouring population is also of the Dida ethnic group, and the applicant lived and traded there for many months. [40]            In Figueroa, above, resuming the principles established by the Federal Appeal Court in Rasaratnam v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 FC 706, 140 NR 138, [1991] FCJ No. 1256 (QL), 31 ACWS (3d) 139, and Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1994] 1 FCR 589, 1993 CanLII 3011 (FCA), Strickland J. recalls the burden of proof that lies on refugee protection claimants: [52]      The burden is on the Applicants to establish on objective evidence that relocation to the IFA is unreasonable (Argote v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 128 [Argote]. ...

However, amendments will be denied, and pleadings will be struck, when it is plain and obvious that the underlying claim discloses no reasonable cause of action (Varco Canada, at para 26; Cardinal v R (1993), 72 FTR 309, 46 ACWS (3d) 377).   ...