Search - 德国民法典第1993条

Canada [1994] 1 F.C. 102, [1993] F.C.J. No. 601 in the following passage at paragraphs 23-24: Often the considerations affecting the exercise of discretion will require an appreciation of the circumstances in which the motion arises and of the relief sought. ...

Canada (Labor Relations Board), [1993] F.C.J. No.  616 (C.A.) at paragraph 5; Chen v. ...

Canada, [1993] F.C.J. No 515 at p. 4.   [26]       I reject the Respondent’s argument that the Court could only have intended “with interest” to mean pre-and postjudgment interest.  ...

For example, between 1975 and 1993, the applicant worked as a consultant, administrative assistant and project manager. ...

Heeg's family physician, which noted that in 1993 the functioning of the applicant was entirely appropriate in light of his condition and subsequent follow up appointments only revealed ulcer problems and high blood pressure. ...

CONCLUSION [19]            The difficulties faced by Dr O'Neil are first that he is unable to come within the Hennelly case in order to obtain time extension within which to appeal the 1993 and 2000 Orders; second, that there is no evidence to suggest that there will be any Federal Court proceeding which will touch on the property in question; and third, Dr O'Neil has not, either in his material or in his presentation, met any of the requirements of the RJR-MacDonald test which might assist in a preservation order. [20]            The motion is denied with costs. ...

(the "Company") which failed to remit to the Respondent Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (the CCRA) some of the amounts deducted from its employees' payroll for income tax during the years 1993 to 1996. ...

., [1993] 2 F.C. 425 (C.A.), the Federal Court of Appeal held that the judge responsible for hearing an appeal from a prothonotary's order may vary that decision, inter alia when it has to do with questions vital to the final issue of the case, in which event the judge will exercise his own discretion, reviewing the case from the outset. ...

Canada (Minister of National Revenue- M.N.R.) [1993] F.C.J. No. 768 (F.C.T.D.) upheld on appeal [1997] F.C.J. ...

Canada [1993] 1 C.T.C. 2 (T.D.) I infer from the decisions of the Trial Division and the Federal Court of Appeal that those Courts were satisfied that the relief sought by the Plaintiff is available to him since they found that he had a reasonable cause of action. [20]            The relief granted to the Plaintiff will be determined in relation to the findings of fact which must be ascertained by the trial judge. ...