Search - 德国民法典第1993条
Results 351 - 360 of 738 for 德国民法典第1993条
Did you mean?德国民法典第1990条
FCTD
Seitz v. Canada, 2002 FCT 456
Aqua-Gem Investments Ltd. [1993] 2 F.C. 425 at 459 and 469. Nichols v. ... Ltd., [1993] P.I.Q.R. P54. [Loc. cit.] The Court of Appeal was clearly of the view that such an abuse of process was a separate ground for striking out an action, a ground which did not require the defendant to demonstrate prejudice. ...
FCTD
Range Grain Company Limited v. Canada, docket T-411-88
., [1993] 2 C.T.C. 2447 (T.C.C.); Harvey C. Smith Drugs Ltd. v. The Queen, [1995] 1 C.T.C. 143 (F.C.A.); Federal Farms Limited v. ... The Queen (1993), 93 D.T.C. 5031. In the case at bar, the respondent does not dispute that some manufacturing or processing may have occurred at the grain elevator. ...
FCTD
Emmanuel Solis v. Minister of Citizenship, docket IMM-9-97
In 1993, he was convicted of robbery and possession of a weapon. In 1993, he was convicted of robbery and assault. ...
FCTD
Uashaunnuat v. Canada (Fisheries and Oceans), 2010 FC 1295
Canada (Director General, Corporate Administrative Services, Agriculture Canada), 1993 CanLII 2973 (F.C.), [1993] 3 F.C. 557 (T.D.) applies. ...
FCTD
Verdicchio v. Canada, 2010 FC 117
., [1993] 2 F.C. 425 (FCA), [1993 F.C.J. No. 103 (QL) and Merck & Co. v. ...
FCTD
C.B. Powell Ltd. v. Canada (Border Services Agency), 2009 FC 528
On the other hand, there is a 1993 decision of this Court directly on point – Mueller Canada Inc. v. ... Justice Rouleau’s decision was completely in line with the law as it was in 1993, and I am not certain that the subsequent decisions which I have cited have affected its validity. ...
FCTD
Cooke v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 FC 1161
Facts [2] The CRA is claiming amounts from the applicant for the 1989, 1993 and 1996 to 2002 taxation years. ... According to the affidavit of Timothéos Coshiantis, a relief program officer at the CRA who was in charge of the taxpayer’s request, he took account of the following in his analysis: (a) the applicant’s tax liability resulting from the reassessments for the 1989, 1993 and 1996 to 2002 taxation years, the accrued interest on the liability and the penalties for negligence assessed for the 1996 and 1997 taxation years; (b) the real estate slump of the 1990s; (c) financial hardship, namely the various balance sheets submitted by the applicant, the legal proceedings brought against him or against companies in which he held shares, his personal income from his activities, the financial capacity of the applicant and his spouse as a couple, the retained earnings of the businesses of which he was the sole shareholder and the amounts he received in reimbursement of advances he had made to some of those businesses; (d) the fact that the CRA had informed the applicant regularly of the balance of his liability and had suspended collection against him several times, either because of his promise to make a settlement offer (which he had still not done) or because the CRA was unable to take collection action anyway. ...
FCTD
Astrazeneca Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2011 FC 598
Canada (Minister of National Revenue) (1993), 69 F.T.R. 310, [1994] 1 C.T.C. 215, aff’d [1994] 2 C.T.C. 185, 172 N.R. 313 (FCA) (“ Scannar ”): the timeliness of the motion to amend, the extent to which the amendment would delay an expeditious trial, the extent to which the original position caused another party to follow a course which is not easily altered, and whether the amendment facilitates the court's consideration of the merits of the action ... (C.A.), [1993] 2 F.C. 425 and endorsed with approval by the Supreme Court of Canada in Z.I.Pompey Industrie v.ECU-Line N.V., 2003 SCC 27, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 450 at paragraph 18: Discretionary orders of prothonotaries ought to be disturbed by a motions judge only where (a) they are clearly wrong, in the sense that the exercise of discretion was based upon a wrong principle or a misapprehension of the facts, or (b) in making them, the prothonotary improperly exercised his or her discretion on a question vital to the final issue of the case ...
FCTD
Dobson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2007 FC 565
By 1993, his tax debt had reached $51,148.00. The debt appears to consist mostly of interest, although it has never been possible to determine the precise proportion ... [5] Accrued interest on Wayne Dobson’s unpaid tax account for the period of 1993 to 2002 amounted to $56,294.14, so the estate’s debt as of January 2002 was $101,477.46. ...
FCTD
Canada v. Carapec No. 1, 2007 FC 897
., [1993] 2 F.C. 425 (C.A.), [1993] F.C.J. No. 103 (QL), the Court defined the standard of review applicable to discretionary orders by prothonotaries as follows: [94] [...] ...