Search - 屯门 安南都护府

The contact information is available at Contact Information – Excise Duty, Excise Taxes, Fuel Charge and Air Travellers Security Charge. ... A list of the offices is available at Contact Information – Excise Duty, Excise Taxes, Fuel Charge and Air Travellers Security Charge. ... Closing inventory (column F) The closing inventory is the sum of columns A and B, minus columns C and D, plus or minus any adjustments in column E, and the results for each respective jurisdiction are entered in this column F: A + B – C – D ± E This closing inventory of vaping excise stamps will become the opening inventory for the following reporting period, for each respective jurisdiction. ...

You calculate your adjustment as follows: Adjustment for expenses: $100 × 20% = $20 Include the $20 adjustment in your line 105 calculation if you are filing electronically or on line 104 if you are filing a paper GST/HST return. ... Example- Both methods to calculate ITCs for reimbursements Example- Exact amount of tax paid vs using a factor method Situation Amount Expenses incurred by employee in British Columbia in June 2016 $350.00 + GST at 5% $17.50 + PST at 7% $24.50 Total after tax $392.00 The percentage for which the property or services is for consumption or use in relation to the commercial activities 80% An employer (who is a GST/HST registrant) reimburses employee $300.00 Result Situation This means Using the actual GST the employer incurred on reimbursed expenses The employer is deemed to have paid tax equal to $17.50 × the lesser of: $300/$392 = 77% 80% This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $17.50 × 77% = $13.48 Using the factor to calculate the reimbursement This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $300 × 4/104 = $11.54 In this example, the employer may prefer to claim an ITC equal to the actual GST they incurred on reimbursed expenses. Example – Both methods to calculate ITCs for reimbursements Example – Exact amount of tax paid vs using a factor method Situation Amount Expenses incurred by employee in British Columbia in June 2016 $350.00 + GST at 5% $17.50 + PST at 7% $24.50 Total after tax $392.00 The percentage for which the property or services is for consumption or use in relation to the commercial activities 80% An employer (who is a GST/HST registrant) reimburses employee $300.00 Result for both methods Situation This means Using the actual GST the employer incurred on reimbursed expenses The employer is deemed to have paid tax equal to $17.50 × the lesser of: $300/$392 = 77% 80% This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $17.50 × 77% = $13.48 Using the factor to calculate the reimbursement This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $300 × 4/104 = $11.54 In this example, the employer may prefer to claim an ITC equal to the actual GST they incurred on reimbursed expenses. ...

You calculate your adjustment as follows: Adjustment for expenses: $100 × 20% = $20 Include the $20 adjustment in your line 105 calculation if you are filing electronically or on line 104 if you are filing a paper GST/HST return. ... Example- Both methods to calculate ITCs for reimbursements Example- Exact amount of tax paid vs using a factor method Situation Amount Expenses incurred by employee in British Columbia in June 2016 $350.00 + GST at 5% $17.50 + PST at 7% $24.50 Total after tax $392.00 The percentage for which the property or services is for consumption or use in relation to the commercial activities 80% An employer (who is a GST/HST registrant) reimburses employee $300.00 Result Situation This means Using the actual GST the employer incurred on reimbursed expenses The employer is deemed to have paid tax equal to $17.50 × the lesser of: $300/$392 = 77% 80% This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $17.50 × 77% = $13.48 Using the factor to calculate the reimbursement This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $300 × 4/104 = $11.54 In this example, the employer may prefer to claim an ITC equal to the actual GST they incurred on reimbursed expenses. Example – Both methods to calculate ITCs for reimbursements Example – Exact amount of tax paid vs using a factor method Situation Amount Expenses incurred by employee in British Columbia in June 2016 $350.00 + GST at 5% $17.50 + PST at 7% $24.50 Total after tax $392.00 The percentage for which the property or services is for consumption or use in relation to the commercial activities 80% An employer (who is a GST/HST registrant) reimburses employee $300.00 Result Situation This means Using the actual GST the employer incurred on reimbursed expenses The employer is deemed to have paid tax equal to $17.50 × the lesser of: $300/$392 = 77% 80% This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $17.50 × 77% = $13.48 Using the factor to calculate the reimbursement This means that the employer could claim an ITC of the following amount: $300 × 4/104 = $11.54 In this example, the employer may prefer to claim an ITC equal to the actual GST they incurred on reimbursed expenses. ...

Code 78 – Fishers – Gross income See Code 78 – Fishers- Gross income. Code 79 – Fishers – Net partnership amount See Code 79 – Fishers – Net partnership amount. Code 80 – Fishers – Shareperson amount See Code 80 – Fishers – Shareperson amount. ...

Box 195: Portion subject to an interest-free period – ITC – Enter this amount in Area I on Form T1229. Box 196: Portion subject to an interest-free period – CEE – Enter this amount in Area I on Form T1229. ... Box 197: Expenses qualifying for a provincial tax credit – BC – You need this information to calculate provincial tax credits. ...

FMV of the building when you disposed of it $ Blank space for dollar value Line 1 2. ... Line 1 plus line 2 $ Blank space for dollar value Line 3 4. Seller's adjusted cost base of the land $ Blank space for dollar value Line 4 5. ... Line 3 minus line 4 $ Blank space for dollar value Line 5 6. Line 5 $ Blank space for dollar value × 1/2 $ Blank space for dollar value Line 6 7. ...